Connect with us

Travel

Why Trump’s tariff threats are bringing more American travellers to Europe this year

Published

on

A stronger dollar and Canadians boycotting the US are leading many to change their travel plans.

Trump’s tariff threats and economic uncertainty are causing Canadians to ditch the US and travel to Europe instead. Americans are planning to join them on the old continent, thanks to the US dollar stretching further in travel money. While Americans living in Europe say they’re definitely staying put, seeking to avoid their “toxic and expensive” homeland.

As the new US President’s many policy changes are revealed, Euronews Travel looks at what impact they might have on travel.

Will the US dollar be strong in 2025?

If economists are right, the US dollar will strengthen further against foreign currencies. Even the threat of a new tariff policy means that major world currencies – like the euro – get weakened by moving interest rates.

This then grants Americans who wish to travel outside the states better buying power, potentially enjoying longer or more luxurious trips if they book guided tours, accommodations and restaurants in the local currency.

US expats in Europe plan to stay away from ‘toxic’ America

Craig Sauers, an American based in Tbilisi, Georgia, was already living abroad when Trump won in 2016, which he says came as “a shock.”

As an American abroad, he feels “ashamed, embarrassed and angry” and was “appalled that so many Americans bought into his messaging” eight years later.

“I certainly don’t plan to move back to the US anytime soon. MAGA regime change is one thing, but inflationary pressures also haven’t eased at all. The US is both toxic and expensive right now, and that’s a bad mix,” says Sauers.

“I do hope to visit, though. I’m not getting any younger, and I can’t let my pride get in the way of relationships with my parents, siblings, and nieces and nephews.”

Jared Batzel currently lives in Madrid and is studying for his MBA. He previously served in the US military and other public-sector roles, including USAID which has been all but closed down under Trump.

“I’ve always periodically boomeranged back to the United States for one reason or another… but the returns have been increasingly jarring,” he says.

Batzel is keeping his existing plans to visit the US in May, “mostly for personal or professional requirements”, but says there’s nothing he misses in America, despite being born and raised in a very pro-Trump region of America.

While he understands some complaints and frustrations that Trump voters have, he says he “doesn’t recognise much of America anymore.”

“I have many English-speaking colleagues in Spain who are from a few dozen countries. Many have worked in the United States before or were looking to in the future. Virtually all of them have reconsidered and are seeking more long-term opportunities in Europe or in their home countries,” adds Batzel.

“This goes beyond the politics of the day and includes things like inflation and cost of living, crime and mass shootings, and many other reasons that have made the American brand toxic on the world stage.”

Why are Canadians cancelling travel to the US?

After the Trump administration threatened Canada with hefty tariffs in its first few days in office, prime minister Justin Trudeau told citizens to “choose Canada”.

“It might mean changing your summer vacation plans to stay here in Canada and explore the many national and provincial parks, historical sites and tourist destinations our great country has to offer,” Trudeau said.

Canada listened, too, according to the latest data.

“Already, Flight Centre experts have helped several Canadians pivot away from their US vacations and rebook elsewhere,” Flight Centre Travel Group in Canada told Open Jaw, a daily news site for Canadian travel agents.

“One of our long-time customers cancelled a trip to Arizona over the weekend and now plans to bring her family to Portugal instead,” the travel company confirmed.

Some of these trips are “bucket-list and milestone experiences,” costing between €6,700 and €13,480. Planned cruises are also being cancelled because many stop off at US ports.

It’s not just leisure travellers who are cancelling: A recent Corporate Traveller/YouGov survey reveals that 40 per cent of Canadian small and medium-sized businesses have already cut anticipated US-bound business travel. US customs lines in major Canadian airports are reportedly already much quieter.

According to the US Travel Association (USTA), Canadians are the top source of international visitors to the United States. They enjoy the warmer climes of Florida, California, Nevada, New York, and Texas. In 2024, 20.4 million Canadians visited the US, spending $20.5 billion (€19.60 bn).

Tariffs – when goods imported from other countries are charged a tax, typically a percentage of a product’s value – are a significant part of Trump’s economic plans.

In the first few days of office, the new US administration introduced a 10 per cent tax on all products from China and has also proposed introducing tariffs on products from Canada and Mexico.

Whether the tariffs come or not, Canadians are saying they will continue to cancel. Air Canada will cut several routes to Florida, Las Vegas, and Arizona starting in March, citing the tariff dispute and the weakened Canadian dollar, reports Travel and Tour World.

Hawaii fear fewer holidaygoers in 2025

Although Hawaii is a popular holiday destination with a distinct cultural identity from mainland America, the archipelago relies on the US dollar and so is also seeing fewer visitors due to tariff threats imposed on foreign imports.

Demand for WestJet, a local airline that flies from the US to all the major Hawaiian islands, has dropped by 25 per cent in recent weeks, according to local media, Khon2.

Locals who rely on tourism on the island are now pleading with international visitors not to cancel their trips. Whether the islanders’ requests to support Hawaii’s vital tourism industry are heard, time is yet to tell.

Author

  • Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Travel

Chinese warship drill prompts civilian flight diversions over Tasman Sea

Published

on

Beijing had given notice that the warships could potentially fire live weapons during an exercise on Friday, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said.

Commercial flights were warned to avoid airspace over the Tasman Sea between Australia and New Zealand on Friday after Chinese warships took part in an apparent live-fire drill.

It’s understood at least three commercial flights diverted their course after China had given notice that three of its warships could potentially fire live weapons in a military exercise.

Domestic regulator Airservices Australia pre-warned commercial pilots of a potential air space hazard, while Air New Zealand, the neighbouring country’s national carrier, said it had “modified flight paths as needed to avoid the area, with no impact on our operations.”

After the warning, Australian defence officials said they were uncertain whether any live fire of weapons took place. Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced that any risk had since passed.

“There was no imminent risk of danger to any Australian assets or New Zealand assets,” Albanese told reporters, citing information from his Defence Ministry.

Australian and New Zealand military ships and P-8 Poseidon surveillance planes have been monitoring the three Chinese warships — frigate Hengyang, cruiser Zunyi and replenishment vessel Weishanhu — for days.

The deployment of Chinese ships in the Tasman Sea is regarded as a demonstration of the Chinese navy’s growing size and capability. However, the ships rarely venture so far south.

“Pilots often have to contend with obstacles to safe navigation, whether that be from military exercises such as this or other events like rocket launches, space debris or volcanic eruptions,” Steve Cornell of the Australian and International Pilots Association said.

“That being said, it’s a big bit of ocean and you would think that they could have parked somewhere less inconvenient whilst they flexed their muscles,” he added.

Albanese said the Chinese exercise was legal and took place in international waters outside Australia’s exclusive economic zone.

The country’s foreign minister, Penny Wong, told ABC television that the presence of Chinese ships in waters off Australia was an evolving situation and that she would be “discussing this with the Chinese.”

“We already have at official level, in relation to the notice given and the transparency provided in relation to these exercises, particularly the live fire exercises,” Wong added.

The incident follows another in the South China Sea last week when a Chinese fighter jet released flares in front of an Australian military plane.

Author

  • Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Travel

Travel chaos in Belgium as nine days of national train strikes begin: Will any lines be running?

Published

on

Travellers in Belgium are advised to re-think travel plans as the next six weeks hold several planned strikes.

Widespread travel disruption is already hitting Belgium this morning as a 9-day train strike begins.

A nationwide railway strike officially starts today (Friday 21 February) at 10pm, running until 10pm on 2 March.

To add to travellers’ woes, airport workers will continue striking on the 13th of every month until further notice, and travel across Belgium is expected to be impacted by more strikes and mass protests that could last well into springtime.

Read on for Euronews Travel’s advice on how to navigate the travel disruption in Belgium.

Belgium: Nationwide rail strike from 21 February to 2 March

Travellers can expect significant travel disruption in Brussels, Antwerp, Bruges, and other major cities from 10pm on 21 February until 10pm on 2 March, not just with trains but also to other public transport, including buses, trams, and metro services.

In a statement, Belgian National Railway Company SNCB say: “We understand and regret that this strike may interfere with your travels”, adding that “in order to deal with the limited number of trains running, we will put in place an alternative service in accordance with staff availability.”

Most SNCB personnel and those working on rail infrastructure for companies Infrabel and HR-Rail will be on strike, meaning Belgium’s rail network could be brought to a near standstill.

SNCB advises travellers to regularly check for updates via its journey planner on its website or the SNCB app.

International train services, including Eurostar, TGV INOUI, EuroCity, Eurocity Direct, ICE and OUIGO, are expected to remain unaffected, but you can receive live updates on the SNCB International website.

The SNCB suggests you “consider alternative routes when travelling on cross-border local trains to/from Lille, Maubeuge, Luxembourg, Roosendaal, Maastricht or Aachen – and if you need to take a local connection in Belgium before or after your international journey”.

Commuters are already complaining about delays and cancellations

The impact of the rail strikes are already being felt by commuters.

X user @blasco_music wrote on the social media platform morning, “The@SNCB dares to strike for 10 days and put people in even more trouble when you know because of them there are people who already have daily problems with their employers because they never arrived on time.”

Another person, under the handle @KvanCoban, posted even stronger words on X: “What is wrong with the Belgian railways!” and adding, “How can it not be solved for so long? And they say that Belgium is a developed country!”

The nationwide strike comes after recent mass protests in Brussels

Some Belgians are opposed to the new government coalition, and they are taking to the streets to make their feelings heard.

It was estimated that 50,000 people protested on the streets of Brussels yesterday, according to union officials.

These mass protests are to address “imbalances” around public services and purchasing power in the coalition government’s agenda. These include concerns over cutting public services, stricter measures on unemployment benefits, pension reform and workplace flexibility.

Demonstrations of this nature are common in Belgium and are primarily peaceful, especially in the Brussels’ EU quarter (Schuman area) and around transport hubs and government buildings.

However these protests can cause significant problems for public transport, postal services, and air travel, and disruption to businesses.

A general strike has also been called on 31 March. All these strikes are in opposition to the federal government’s proposed policies.

Why are there so many strikes happening in Belgium?

Most of the strikes are targeting new government policies. While negotiations with unions are underway, tensions remain high.

The main reasons for the railway industrial actions are pension reforms, changes to labour law, and budget cuts to rail operator SNCB. The strikes coincide with the school holidays in French-speaking education.

While the government has not responded to the planned strikes, the leader of the Flemish Christian-democratic political party (CD&V), Sammy Mahdi, struck out at the railway strikes, calling them “completely irresponsible.” He called them “a slap in the face of commuters, workers in less privileged sectors and future generations who rely on us to secure pensions,” according to the Belga news agency.

“Organising total chaos on the railways because you’re the only sector that can’t retire at 55? Irresponsible.”

Are rail passengers entitled to compensation during a strike?

The normal conditions for refunding or exchanging your ticket remain the same, even if there is a strike, as according to EU law, train companies have to get ticket holders to their final destination or issue them with a refund.

If you choose to travel even if your train is delayed, you may still be eligible for a partial or full refund. This usually depends on how late your train arrives at its destination.

If your train is delayed by more than 60 minutes, you can choose not to travel and will receive a full refund for your ticket. Alternatively, you can have your ticket reissued for travel at a later date.

SNCB has full details on how to claim a refund here.

Author

  • Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Travel

Delta plane crash passengers offered $30,000 with ‘no strings attached’

Published

on

All 80 people onboard survived the crash.

Passengers who were onboard the Delta Airlines flight that crash landed in Toronto earlier this week have been offered $30,000 (€28,760) in compensation.

Delta Flight 4819 burst into flames and flipped over when it landed at Toronto Pearson International Airport on 17 February.

Although none of the 80 passengers and crew onboard were killed in the accident, all 76 passengers have been offered $30,000 (€28,760).

A Delta spokesperson said that the financial offer “has no strings attached and does not affect rights”. This likely means that passengers will still be at liberty to sue the airline.

If all of the passengers accept the money, the airline will owe nearly $2.3 million (€2.2 million) in total.

Passengers recount what it was like to be in the crash

21 passengers were injured and taken to local hospitals after the crash. 20 of these have now been released.

Witnesses and video from the scene shows the plane landing so hard that its right wing is sheared off. It bursts into flames before sliding down the runway and flipping over.

“It appears from the video that the plane landed so hard that the right main gear collapsed. The tail and right wing began skidding causing the plane to roll over to the right,” Ella Atkins, the head of Virginia Tech’s aerospace and ocean engineering department and a pilot. “During the rollover, the right wing and tail sheared off, and a fire ignited, likely due to skidding and fuel leakage at least from a right wing tank.”

John Nelson, one of the passengers, captured the scene as he climbed out of the upside-down plane. He described a hard landing and the plane skidding onto its side before flipping onto its back.

In an interview with Canadian broadcaster CBC News, passenger Pete Carlson described the touchdown as a “forceful event, where all of a sudden everything just kind of went sideways.”

Carlson had fastened his seatbelt, as instructed, prior to landing. When he unlatched the belt to evacuate the plane, he said he “crashed down onto the ceiling, which had become the floor.”

He smelled gas, saw aviation fuel cascading down the cabin windows and knew they all had to get out. Carlson and another man assisted a mother and her son out of the plane, then Carlson dropped onto the snowy tarmac.

“All of us just wanted to be out of the aircraft,” he said.

What caused the Delta plane crash in Toronto?

While the cause of the crash remains unclear, aviation experts have been giving their professional opinion on likely factors.

Experts say investigators will consider conditions on the ground, the pilot’s actions before landing, and potential problems with the landing gear. The Transportation Safety Board of Canada is leading the investigation with support from the US National Transportation Safety Board.

Was the pilot to blame?

Communications between the tower and pilot were normal on approach and it’s not clear what went wrong when the plane – a Mitsubishi CRJ-900 made by the Canadian company Bombardier – touched down.

Juan Browne, a commercial pilot who discusses aviation incidents on his YouTube channel, said preliminary data suggests the speed and rate of descent, crosswinds and the weather were “within limits.”

But Browne raised concerns about the pilots’ actions before landing.

“It appears that the aircraft simply did not flare at all,” Browne said. Flaring slows the aircraft’s rate of descent. “They just drove it into the runway.”

The Delta flight was cleared to land at about 2.10 pm. Audio recordings show the control tower warned the pilots of a possible air flow “bump” on approach.

“It was windy, but the airplanes are designed and certified to handle that,” said John Cox, CEO of aviation safety consulting firm Safety Operating Systems in St. Petersburg, Florida. “The pilots are trained and experienced to handle that.”

What was the weather like?

At the time of the crash, Pearson airport was experiencing blowing snow and winds of 32 mph (51 kph) gusting to 40 mph (65 kph), according to the Meteorological Service of Canada. The temperature was about 16.5 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 8.6 degrees Celsius). Browne said blowing snow reduces visibility.

Michael McCormick, an assistant professor and program coordinator for air traffic management at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, Florida, said investigators would look closely at the landing gear to make sure it was properly locked in place, and would consider staffing on the ground and in the aircraft.

“They will look at the number of people working both on the aircraft and the control towers. And they will look at their schedules,” McCormick said. “Are they well rested? Are they well staffed?”

But a Canadian investigator refused to comment on preliminary theories.

“At this point, it’s far too early to say what the cause of this accident might be,” TSB Senior Investigator Ken Webster said in a video statement Tuesday, as he stood near the remains of the aircraft.

He said investigators will examine the wreckage and runway, and have removed the cockpit voice and flight data recorders and sent them to the lab for analysis.

That everyone survived the Delta crash is a testament to the safety improvements made by airlines and aircraft manufacturers, including wings that are designed to come off to reduce explosions, well-trained flight crews and seats built to withstand impacts of up to 16 times the force of gravity.

“That seat is your single best resource in order to keep you protected,” McCormick said. “There’s a reason why the flight attendants walk around the aircraft prior to (landing) … to make sure everybody has their seat belts fastened.”

Is flying still safe?

The crash was the fourth major aviation accident in North America in recent weeks. A commercial jetliner and an Army helicopter collided near Reagan National Airport in Washington, DC, on 29 January killing 67 people. A medical transportation plane crashed in Philadelphia on 31 January, killing the six people onboard and another person on the ground. On 6 February, 10 people were killed in a plane crash in Alaska.

Nevertheless, according to Jeff Guzzetti, an airline safety consultant and a former FAA and NTSB investigator, air travel is “extremely safe.”

“The odds of getting injured or killed in an commercial airline accident is far less than driving in your car,” Guzzetti said.

Still, he worries about layoffs at the Federal Aviation Administration under the Trump administration. ”I am concerned that the proposed cuts and changes to the FAA may increase the risk of further accidents,” he said.

Author

  • Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 EuroTimes

Exit mobile version