Travel
Ryanair accused of blackmail by Spanish airports as it cuts 800,000 seats for summer 2025
Travellers will find fewer low-cost options at Spanish regional airports this summer.
European low-cost behemoth and one of the biggest budget airlines in the world, Ryanair has pulled thousands of seats from its schedules for 2025 across several Spanish airports.
In all, seven airports will have their Ryanair services reduced, some by as little as five per cent. Others will see the exit of the budget airline entirely.
Overall, Ryanair is removing a total of 800,000 seats from the Spanish market, representing 18 per cent of its overall operations in the country. Twelve routes will be lost altogether.
The airline says this is because of the fees imposed by Spanish airport operator Aena, which it deems ‘excessive.’ However, Aena has hit back at the airline, accusing it of ‘blackmail’ and suggesting that Ryanair is using its weight to try and get airport access for free.
“Unfortunately, this is Ryanair’s modus operandi,” says Maurici Lucena, President of Aena. “In many European countries, we have seen it for years: threats, half-truths, lies…; but in the case of Spain, I honestly believe that today they have crossed the Rubicon of respect, good faith and the most basic business and institutional courtesy.”
Which airports are losing Ryanair service?
It is mainly regional airports in Spain that are losing either part or all of their Ryanair services.
Most affected are Jerez and Valladolid, which the budget airline will pull out of entirely.
According to Aena, Valladolid will be left with only one commercial operator once Ryanair exits – Binter Canarias, with its twice-weekly service to Gran Canaria.
Jerez will fare better, with existing services from Binter, Air Nostrum and Vueling connecting it to Madrid, Barcelona, Mallorca, Tenerife and Gran Canaria.
Of the other airports, Vigo will lose the most capacity, with Ryanair cutting 61 per cent of its flights.
At Santiago, Ryanair will remove one aircraft from its base there, leading to a 28 per cent reduction in capacity. Zaragoza, Asturias and Santander will also lose a few Ryanair flights.
“Aena’s excessive airport charges and lack of workable growth incentives continue to undermine Spain’s regional airports,” says Eddie Wilson, CEO of Ryanair. “As a result, Ryanair will cease its entire Jerez and Valladolid operations, remove 1 based aircraft from Santiago ($100m investment) and reduce traffic in Vigo, Santiago, Zaragoza, Asturias, and Santander (loss of 800,000 seats) in Summer 2025.”
What are the fees Ryanair is unhappy with?
Aena says that the average charge being paid by airlines for airport services as of 1 March will remain frozen at €10.35 per passenger, the same as it was in 2024.
“Aena’s refusal to incentivise airlines to use underutilised capacity at its regional airports has forced Ryanair to reallocate aircraft and capacity to more competitive European markets,” Wilson adds.
However, Aena disputes the assertion that they are not incentivising airlines to make use of regional airports. At the end of October 2024, the airport management company approved an initiative to stimulate growth by subsidising its 17 regional airports.
Specifically, for those airports with fewer than three million passengers and which had not returned to their pre-pandemic passenger levels, Aena has offered a 100 per cent discount for additional passengers over and above the 2023 levels.
Aena says that, in reality, this incentive scheme would reduce Ryanair’s per-passenger fee to just €2.
“Aena cordially urges Ryanair to calm down and abandon its long-standing and regrettably well-known mendacious, aggressive and threatening business and communication strategy,” the airport operator says, “which it is very difficult not to interpret as an attempt to blackmail Aena, the region and, ultimately, the Spanish public.”
Are the fees at Spanish airports hampering growth?
Aena says its fees are amongst the lowest in Europe, although Ryanair says this isn’t true.
Inflationary pressures have seen everything become more expensive, including in aviation. From fuel and staff to supplies and services, it all costs more than it used to and airlines have been quick to pass on to passengers.
The International Air Transport Association (IATA) says that airfares increased 16 per cent in 2024 compared with 2019. However, Airports Council International (ACI) has published research that suggests they’re more like 38 per cent higher.
On the other hand, airports have not been able to raise their charges to the same magnitude. ACI says that airport charges in Europe rose just 13.6 per cent in 2024, far below the cost increases airports are experiencing.
“Many airports have yet to fully reflect inflationary pressures in their user charges,” says Olivier Jankovec, director general of ACI Europe. “Regulators are often oblivious of these pressures and of how debt accumulated through COVID is hurting their investment capabilities.”
Part of Ryanair’s argument is that Aena was allowed to raise fees by 4.09 per cent in 2024, despite the Spanish government ruling in 2021 that airport fees would be frozen for five years.
In 2023, the Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia (CNMC) approved the rise, which shakes out to a total of €0.40 more per passenger. Aena again proposed an increase for 2025, which would have added €0.05 to the cost for airlines, but it was refused by CNMC.
Despite Ryanair’s assertions that fees are at the heart of its schedule changes, the argument weakens when its entire Spanish operation is considered.
“I am surprised that they are questioning the profitability of these routes,” says Lucena. He goes on to explain that Ryanair’s flights from the regional airports have been full – fuller even than those at major city airports.
Throughout 2024, Ryanair increased its activity at Spanish airports by 8.7 per cent. For 2025, despite the cuts the airline has planned, its Spanish activities will increase again, with around 5 per cent more flights overall.
Ryanair is continuing to grow at the largest and most touristic Spanish airports. These airports do not attract the incentive discount, and airlines are charged the full €10.35 per passenger.
“In reality, what Ryanair has announced is that it will withdraw a very small percentage, in relative terms, of its total operations,” says Lucena. “The 800,000 seats they announced account for exactly 1.21 per cent of all passenger traffic they carried in 2024.”
He adds that Ryanair is masking business-led route cuts to exert pressure on Aena and the government.
Lucena even goes so far as to say that, under Spanish law, Ryanair’s moves could even be considered illegal. “In short, it’s all rather unpleasant and regrettable,” he concludes.
In a statement, Aena reiterated its position, saying, “Despite its grandiloquent rhetoric, Ryanair’s constant public pressure boils down to a simple goal: to use a significant portion of Spanish airports for free, which would jeopardise the long-term financial sustainability of Spain’s airport system.”
Travel
Work from home in New Zealand: Kiwis relax visa rules to attract digital nomads
While the rule change falls short of a full digital nomad visa, it’s now easier to work while visiting New Zealand.
Working from home has become quite the privilege in the post-pandemic era. While some companies are rolling back work-from-home rules, others have enshrined them in their culture, actively encouraging workers to stay home and avoid the commute.
While most of us might be confined to the dining table or bedroom desk on work-from-home days, there’s now another option. How about working from home in New Zealand for a proposal?
New Zealand’s government is relaxing the rules around visas to allow those on tourist visits to continue their work while visiting the country.
Under the new rules, which came in on Monday 27 January, tourists will be allowed to work remotely for a foreign employer under the country’s new ‘digital nomad’ initiative.
What do the New Zealand visa rule changes mean?
“The change is part of the Government’s plan to unlock New Zealand’s potential by shifting the country onto a faster growth track,” growth minister Nicola Willis says. “Making the country more attractive to ‘digital nomads’ – people who work remotely while travelling – will boost New Zealand’s attractiveness as a destination.”
The government hopes that, by making it easier for people to work from the country, visitors will be encouraged to stay longer, meaning they’ll spend more and boost the economy in the process.
New Zealand’s economy has been struggling in recent years, falling into a technical recession in the third quarter of 2024. HSBC described the country as ‘suffering the biggest hit in the world in 2024’ as interest rates and inflation strained the country’s economy.
“This is a brand-new market of tourists New Zealand can tap into,” says immigration minister Erica Stanford. “We want people to see our country as the ideal place to visit and work while they do it.”
Who can apply for New Zealand’s digital nomad visa?
The move by New Zealand doesn’t involve a digital nomad visa as such – rather, it is a relaxation of rules that apply to current visas for visiting the country.
The government says that, from 27 January, anyone on a visitor visa will be allowed to work for a foreign employer while holidaying for up to 90 days.
The new rules also apply to visas held by people visiting family and those who are on longer-term visas.
However, the rules only apply to those undertaking remote work for overseas companies. Those whose employment requires them to be in New Zealand, such as salespeople and performers, must still obtain visas relevant to their circumstances.
Tourist visas have a six- or three-month validity, but the New Zealand government says people can request an extension of up to nine months to allow them to stay longer.
“Many countries offer digital nomad visas and the list is growing, so we need to keep pace to ensure New Zealand is an attractive destination for people who want to ‘workcation’ abroad,” says tourism minister Louise Upton.
“Compared to other kinds of visitors, international remote workers have the potential to spend more time and money in New Zealand, including during the shoulder season.”
Is this a precursor to a full digital nomad visa for New Zealand?
The ruling in New Zealand is a little different to the implementation of digital nomad visas elsewhere. Countries such as Spain, Greece, Indonesia and Malaysia have launched digital nomad schemes that require proper visa applications and adherence to rules.
For New Zealand, it’s a much easier process. Visitors simply apply for their regular tourist visa as usual, but with the knowledge they are allowed to work while they’re in the country.
There is hope among the nomadic community that a full visa is in the works, although this rule relaxation could remove some of the urgency related to this.
“While this is not an official digital nomad visa, it is a step in the right direction for digital nomads who want to explore New Zealand,” says Nomads Embassy, a visa support service. “In fact, it takes away some of the bureaucratic headache that comes with applying for digital nomad visas.”
The best locations for digital nomads in New Zealand
There are plenty of reasons to pick New Zealand as a place to work from. Aside from its stunning scenery, safe environment and outdoorsy lifestyle, it has excellent WiFi coverage in towns and cities and friendly locals to help you get around.
The big cities such as Auckland, Wellington, Christchurch and Hamilton offer all the amenities a digital nomad could want, as well as fast and widely available connectivity. If your business relies on networking to find clients or to connect with other nomads, the cities are a good choice for a base.
However, not everything happens in the city, and New Zealand’s smaller towns have a lot to offer the intrepid traveller.
Small towns such as Queenstown, Tauranga, Dunedin and Nelson have strong, supportive communities, and Queenstown in particular is a popular destination for digital nomads.
Picking a smaller town comes with advantages, notably a lower cost of living. Rents, groceries and eating out are all far cheaper once you get outside of the city. As the towns are surrounded by New Zealand’s stunning natural wonders, they also mean you’ll only be a stone’s throw from your next outdoor adventure.
A fun town worth a mention is Mount Maunganui, up on the east coast of the North Island. A short drive from Tauranga and Auckland, it sports a thriving digital nomad community and even has a well-equipped coworking space to meet like-minded individuals.
Travel
The next frontier? Why space tourism might not be as far-fetched as you think
As companies like SpaceX and Virgin Galactic make waves in space tourism, how long does the rest of the world have to wait before we can all become astronauts?
At his inauguration, US President Donald Trump pledged to plant a flag on Mars. “We will pursue our manifest destiny into the stars,” he said on Monday, “launching American astronauts to plant the stars and stripes on the planet Mars.”
The comment elicited a big thumbs-up from Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, who hasn’t been shy about his ambition to not only reach but also colonise the red planet.
In a speech following the inauguration, which included that salute, Musk said, “Can you imagine how awesome it will be to have American astronauts plant the flag on another planet for the first time?”
But how close are we really to being able to take a person to Mars, and what are the hopes for the man on the street of taking a trip into space?
Is it possible to take a holiday into space?
Space tourism is a reality. In fact, the first space tourist took his trip nearly a quarter of a century ago, when Dennis Tito joined the Soyuz TM-32 mission in April 2001.
Since then, around 60 tourists have already travelled into ‘space,’ although most of these have been on suborbital joyrides, only briefly leaving the atmosphere before returning to Earth.
Leading the way is Richard Branson’s Virgin Galactic, launched back in 2004. Although the company has had some setbacks over the years, it has successfully completed seven commercial flights over the past two years with its VSS Unity space plane.
But these flights aren’t exactly reaching the moon. The VSS Unity travels to around 90 km above the Earth’s surface, which reaches the definition of space in NASA’s book, defined as 80 km above sea level. However, the Fédération Aéronautique Internationale (FAI) defines space as beginning at 100 km.
Alongside Virgin Galactic, Amazon billionaire Jeff Bezos created the Blue Origin project to take paying passengers into space. The New Shepard, his reusable passenger rocket, has flown eight crewed space flights since 2021.
Then there’s Musk’s own bid for interplanetary exploration, conducted under his SpaceX company. There are a lot of moving parts to this business, from the huge (and regularly exploding) Starship to the incredible Falcon 9 launchers that bizarrely guide themselves back down to the launch pad for reuse.
The tourism part of SpaceX is undertaken by its Crew Dragon spacecraft, a highly automated spaceship designed to be accessible to civilians with little to no training. Fifteen crewed launches have taken place, 10 on behalf of NASA and five purely commercial.
Although SpaceX draws attention for its rocket launches and Starlink constellation, the founding ethos of the company was to make human life multi-planetary. Specifically, its goal is to colonise Mars.
“History is going to bifurcate along two directions. One path is we stay on Earth forever, and then there will be some eventual extinction event,” Musk said in 2016. “The alternative is to become a spacefaring civilisation and a multi-planet species, which I hope you would agree is the right way to go.”
How will space tourism evolve over the coming years?
When it comes to making space tourism more accessible to the masses, technology is key. And thanks to having both President Trump and his sidekick Elon Musk making the rules, things could start moving a lot faster.
“There is a new supportive attitude for developments coming from America,” Dr Annette Toivonen, space tourism expert from Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences, told Euronews Travel. “That will bring with it good things and bad.”
“The technology will rapidly evolve because legislation on space will be kept as minimal as possible,” she adds. “But at the same time there are some big questions to answer, such as is it ethical, is it environmentally friendly?”
Not much about rocket launches could be considered sustainable, although companies are working hard to improve propulsion systems and develop reusable launchers. Nevertheless, Dr Toivonen believes there is an environmental benefit to sending billionaires into space.
“When people go to space and see how fragile we are, and they see this very thin layer of ozone, it’s a scary experience for them,” she explained. “For some people, to see this with their own eyes and to know how we are polluting the planet, it could be a life-changing experience for them.”
When the people who are having these life-changing experiences are the wealthiest and most powerful people on Earth, the consequences could be positive. “It’s a bit of a twisted angle,” Toivonen says, “but these people are the ones with the influence and the money and the power to actually change something.”
Nevertheless, she agrees that it’s a tricky time to be a space exploration company. “With the climate crisis and everything else that’s going on, they really need to justify their presence.”
How realistic is manned flight to Mars?
“The technology is not present at the moment,” says Dr Tovionen, “not to get there in four years anyway. Right now it seems like mission impossible.”
Cost is a major factor. When the USA went to the moon in 1969, it cost the nation $25.8 billion (€24.5 billion). In today’s money, that would equate to almost $320 billion (€300bn). That was around 4 per cent of the total federal budget, and a big indicator of why we haven’t been back since.
Technological and financial restrictions aside, there are some fundamental problems with travelling to space that humanity just hasn’t solved yet. Cosmic radiation remains one of the most significant challenges for human space exploration, particularly when thinking about long missions to Mars or other planets.
“Although space tourism is very niche, it will quickly grow as an industry,” says Chris Rees, postgraduate researcher at the University of Surrey, who recently published a paper on the need for more warnings about cosmic radiation.
“With increased flights, more people could be impacted by cosmic radiation,” he added. “Regulators and industry should work together to keep people safe without unnecessarily holding back innovation.”
Despite the potential roadblocks, several companies are already making plans to facilitate human arrival on Mars. One such project is Mars Base Camp, Lockheed Martin’s vision for sending humans to Mars in about a decade.
“The concept is simple: transport astronauts from Earth, via the Moon, to a Mars-orbiting science laboratory,” says Lockheed Martin. “There, they can perform real-time scientific exploration, analyze Martian rock and soil samples, and confirm the ideal place to land humans on the surface in the 2030s.”
On the way to Mars, companies think we might like to spend a night or two in outer space, and several are floating concepts for ‘space hotels’.
Above: Space Development (previously called Orbital Assembly) says it could have a space hotel in operation within 60 months of funding being secured. Holding up to 440 people, the Voyager Station is planned to have living quarters, gyms, restaurants and even research pods for scientists.
Jeff Bezos is getting in on the action as well with his proposed Orbital Reef. This $100 billion (€95 billion) space station is designed to orbit Earth like the International Space Station (ISS), but with a focus on tourism, luxury and research.
“Humanity’s future lies in orbital habitats like Orbital Reef, where we can live and work without being tied to a single planet,” Bezos told NASA.
However, not all space tourism concepts have been so fruitful. Dutch company Mars One aimed to be the first to land humans on Mars and establish a permanent colony. Announced in 2012, it drew plenty of interest from wannabe astronauts, receiving 2,700 applications for the 24 places in the settlement programme.
Unfortunately, the company went bankrupt in 2019 owing investors approximately €1 million.
Despite all the signals pointing to humans on Mars being rather far-fetched, at least in the near future, Dr Tovionen reminds us there is always the possibility of a surprise.
“There is always the X factor,” she says. “Because of President Trump’s comments, the whole planet is now aware of the progress we are making in space, and there’s always that unknown, that maybe Musk has an ace up his sleeve that we just don’t know about yet.”
Would there be demand for space tourism to Mars?
Right now, space tourism is the preserve of Ultra-High-Net-Worth individuals (UHNWI). These are people with a net worth of at least $30 million ($28.5 million), of which there are 626,619 in the world today.
But that could change as spaceflight becomes more developed and successful. Efficiency improvements, cheaper materials and technology breakthroughs are likely to bring the cost down, letting space travel companies reduce the price of their tickets.
At present, Virgin Galactic sells seats on its flights for $250,000 to $500,000 per person (€238,000 to €475,000), depending on the mission. SpaceX keeps the details of ticket prices for Blue Origin under wraps, but they’re rumoured to cost around $1 billion.
Until the cost comes down, demand is likely to be minimal, and space will remain accessible only to those with the deepest pockets. But there’s another problem too, and one which could even take the UHNWIs out of contention.
Research by the Chicago Society for Space Studies evaluated holidaymakers, who would need to stay until the planet was at a suitable location to fly back to Earth, would reside on Mars for a minimum of 112 days to a maximum of 1,328 days.
Given the time it takes to fly to Mars from Earth, the total trip would last at least 2.5 years, and could be as long as five years. “The dramatic increase in total vacation duration … will most likely have an overwhelming impact on the number of people willing to undertake a vacation on Mars,” researchers concluded.
UHNWIs are busy people, and spending several years not only out of the country but out of the planet would likely be somewhat awkward. Even if they could spare the time, the living conditions on the Martian surface are unlikely to offer the luxuries to which they are accustomed.
Travel
‘Stay at home’: More than 1,000 UK and Ireland flights cancelled due to ‘once in a generation’ storm
Weather forecasters are saying they have never seen a storm this bad.
A record-breaking storm is wreaking havoc with travel and daily life across the UK and Ireland.
Flights and trains are cancelled across the countries, and driving conditions are very dangerous due to the storm which meteorologists have said is “rapidly developing”.
Citizens have been told to stay at home during the dangerous weather, which is predicted to last all day.
Scotland, Ireland and Northern Ireland all have rare red weather warnings in place, signalling threats to life, and there are yellow and amber warnings in place across the UK.
Storm Eowyn has broken Ireland’s wind speed record, with Met Eireann recording an average wind speed of nearly 135km/h recorded at Mace Head in County Galway early this morning.
Heathrow, Gatwick, Edinburgh, Glasgow airports: Are flights cancelled?
Yes, hundreds of flights have been cancelled at almost all of the UK and Ireland’s biggest airports.
To quickly find out if your flight is affected, you can check the airport’s arrival and departure pages on their website.
It’s also worth checking your airline’s website, app and social media, and keep an eye on your email for updates.
In London, flights have been cancelled at Heathrow, Gatwick, Stansted and London City airports. The cancellations announced so far are until midday UK time but more are likely throughout the afternoon and evening. Here is a full list of London airport cancellations.
Glasgow, Dublin Edinburgh airports have cancelled almost all their departures and arrivals until mid-afternoon.
Storm Eowyn: Are trains running?
Several train operators have issued “do not travel” warnings over safety fears.
ScotRail has suspended all services across Scotland today, saying it “would not be safe to operate passenger services due to forecast weather conditions”.
Avanti West Coast, Lumo, CrossCountry and Grand Central have also told customers not to travel on routes across parts of north Wales, Scotland and northern England.
National Rail said the storm will also affect LNER, London Northwestern Railway/West Midlands Railway, Northern, South Western Railway, Southern, TransPennine Express and some Transport for Wales routes.
Homes and businesses without power and schools closed
More than 715,000 homes, farms and businesses are without power across Ireland, the Irish Electricity Supply Board (ESB) has said.
Earlier, Northern Ireland Electricity (NIE) – which is part of ESB – said more than 93,000 homes and businesses are currently without power in Northern Ireland.
All schools in Ireland and Northern Ireland are closed today (24 January).
Are passengers entitled to a refund or compensation during bad weather?
Under both EU and UK law, airlines and train companies do not have to refund you if the service was cancelled due to ‘extraordinary circumstances’. Bad weather comes under extraordinary circumstances.
So unfortunately passengers may not be entitled to getting their money back, though it’s certainly worth trying.
Airlines do have to look after you during the delay.
In a statement about Storm Eowyn, the UK’S Civil Aviation Authority said: “If a flight faces lengthy delays, airlines have a duty of care to look after their passengers, including providing food and drink, and accommodation if overnight.
“We will not hesitate to take action against any airlines not following these guidelines.”
Airlines and train companies may offer you a later flight or train once the bad weather has cleared, so that you can still get to your destination.
Contact your airline, travel agent or travel company to discuss a refund or compensation.
For more on your rights during flight or train cancellations, check the UK’S Civil Aviation Authority website or the EU’s Air Passenger Rights website.
-
EU & the World6 days ago
NYT Connections January 21: Get the Hints and Final Answer
-
EU & the World6 days ago
Wordle Answer Today — January 21: See Hints & Solution
-
Sports6 days ago
Aryna Sabalenka: gesture that doesn’t escape the cameras. Watch the video
-
Health & Society5 days ago
Over 16,000 students expelled from schools in Greece
-
Sports6 days ago
Adriano Panatta and Paolo Bertolucci unleash everyone on Anna Kalinskaya
-
EU & the World4 days ago
Is ‘I’m Still Here’ Streaming Anywhere? How to Watch the Movie
-
Sports6 days ago
Cagliari armors Gabriele Zappa
-
Sports6 days ago
Sofia Goggia immediately out at Kronplatz: ‘Chicken mistake’