Travel
Ryanair accused of blackmail by Spanish airports as it cuts 800,000 seats for summer 2025
Travellers will find fewer low-cost options at Spanish regional airports this summer.
European low-cost behemoth and one of the biggest budget airlines in the world, Ryanair has pulled thousands of seats from its schedules for 2025 across several Spanish airports.
In all, seven airports will have their Ryanair services reduced, some by as little as five per cent. Others will see the exit of the budget airline entirely.
Overall, Ryanair is removing a total of 800,000 seats from the Spanish market, representing 18 per cent of its overall operations in the country. Twelve routes will be lost altogether.
The airline says this is because of the fees imposed by Spanish airport operator Aena, which it deems ‘excessive.’ However, Aena has hit back at the airline, accusing it of ‘blackmail’ and suggesting that Ryanair is using its weight to try and get airport access for free.
“Unfortunately, this is Ryanair’s modus operandi,” says Maurici Lucena, President of Aena. “In many European countries, we have seen it for years: threats, half-truths, lies…; but in the case of Spain, I honestly believe that today they have crossed the Rubicon of respect, good faith and the most basic business and institutional courtesy.”
Which airports are losing Ryanair service?
It is mainly regional airports in Spain that are losing either part or all of their Ryanair services.
Most affected are Jerez and Valladolid, which the budget airline will pull out of entirely.
According to Aena, Valladolid will be left with only one commercial operator once Ryanair exits – Binter Canarias, with its twice-weekly service to Gran Canaria.
Jerez will fare better, with existing services from Binter, Air Nostrum and Vueling connecting it to Madrid, Barcelona, Mallorca, Tenerife and Gran Canaria.
Of the other airports, Vigo will lose the most capacity, with Ryanair cutting 61 per cent of its flights.
At Santiago, Ryanair will remove one aircraft from its base there, leading to a 28 per cent reduction in capacity. Zaragoza, Asturias and Santander will also lose a few Ryanair flights.
“Aena’s excessive airport charges and lack of workable growth incentives continue to undermine Spain’s regional airports,” says Eddie Wilson, CEO of Ryanair. “As a result, Ryanair will cease its entire Jerez and Valladolid operations, remove 1 based aircraft from Santiago ($100m investment) and reduce traffic in Vigo, Santiago, Zaragoza, Asturias, and Santander (loss of 800,000 seats) in Summer 2025.”
What are the fees Ryanair is unhappy with?
Aena says that the average charge being paid by airlines for airport services as of 1 March will remain frozen at €10.35 per passenger, the same as it was in 2024.
“Aena’s refusal to incentivise airlines to use underutilised capacity at its regional airports has forced Ryanair to reallocate aircraft and capacity to more competitive European markets,” Wilson adds.
However, Aena disputes the assertion that they are not incentivising airlines to make use of regional airports. At the end of October 2024, the airport management company approved an initiative to stimulate growth by subsidising its 17 regional airports.
Specifically, for those airports with fewer than three million passengers and which had not returned to their pre-pandemic passenger levels, Aena has offered a 100 per cent discount for additional passengers over and above the 2023 levels.
Aena says that, in reality, this incentive scheme would reduce Ryanair’s per-passenger fee to just €2.
“Aena cordially urges Ryanair to calm down and abandon its long-standing and regrettably well-known mendacious, aggressive and threatening business and communication strategy,” the airport operator says, “which it is very difficult not to interpret as an attempt to blackmail Aena, the region and, ultimately, the Spanish public.”
Are the fees at Spanish airports hampering growth?
Aena says its fees are amongst the lowest in Europe, although Ryanair says this isn’t true.
Inflationary pressures have seen everything become more expensive, including in aviation. From fuel and staff to supplies and services, it all costs more than it used to and airlines have been quick to pass on to passengers.
The International Air Transport Association (IATA) says that airfares increased 16 per cent in 2024 compared with 2019. However, Airports Council International (ACI) has published research that suggests they’re more like 38 per cent higher.
On the other hand, airports have not been able to raise their charges to the same magnitude. ACI says that airport charges in Europe rose just 13.6 per cent in 2024, far below the cost increases airports are experiencing.
“Many airports have yet to fully reflect inflationary pressures in their user charges,” says Olivier Jankovec, director general of ACI Europe. “Regulators are often oblivious of these pressures and of how debt accumulated through COVID is hurting their investment capabilities.”
Part of Ryanair’s argument is that Aena was allowed to raise fees by 4.09 per cent in 2024, despite the Spanish government ruling in 2021 that airport fees would be frozen for five years.
In 2023, the Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia (CNMC) approved the rise, which shakes out to a total of €0.40 more per passenger. Aena again proposed an increase for 2025, which would have added €0.05 to the cost for airlines, but it was refused by CNMC.
Despite Ryanair’s assertions that fees are at the heart of its schedule changes, the argument weakens when its entire Spanish operation is considered.
“I am surprised that they are questioning the profitability of these routes,” says Lucena. He goes on to explain that Ryanair’s flights from the regional airports have been full – fuller even than those at major city airports.
Throughout 2024, Ryanair increased its activity at Spanish airports by 8.7 per cent. For 2025, despite the cuts the airline has planned, its Spanish activities will increase again, with around 5 per cent more flights overall.
Ryanair is continuing to grow at the largest and most touristic Spanish airports. These airports do not attract the incentive discount, and airlines are charged the full €10.35 per passenger.
“In reality, what Ryanair has announced is that it will withdraw a very small percentage, in relative terms, of its total operations,” says Lucena. “The 800,000 seats they announced account for exactly 1.21 per cent of all passenger traffic they carried in 2024.”
He adds that Ryanair is masking business-led route cuts to exert pressure on Aena and the government.
Lucena even goes so far as to say that, under Spanish law, Ryanair’s moves could even be considered illegal. “In short, it’s all rather unpleasant and regrettable,” he concludes.
In a statement, Aena reiterated its position, saying, “Despite its grandiloquent rhetoric, Ryanair’s constant public pressure boils down to a simple goal: to use a significant portion of Spanish airports for free, which would jeopardise the long-term financial sustainability of Spain’s airport system.”
Travel
Travel warning: Bringing European meat and dairy products into the UK could land you a €6,000 fine
The UK has put a temporary ban on travellers from Europe (including returning British citizens) bringing meat and dairy products into the country.
The restrictions came in on 12 April in response to the uptick in cases of foot-and-mouth disease on the continent.
Visitors in possession of banned items will have to surrender them at the border or have them seized and destroyed.
Travellers arriving from an EU or EFTA country (Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein) currently cannot bring meat from cattle, sheep, pigs or goats, or dairy produce into the UK for personal consumption.
The ban includes sandwiches, cheeses, cured meats and raw meats, according to the new ruling from the British government.
Even products which are packed or packaged, or have been purchased at duty free are off limits.
Travellers found in possession of these items risk fines of up to £5,000 (€5,845) in the most serious cases.
The restrictions only apply to visitors arriving in Great Britain – but not in Northern Ireland, Jersey, Guernsey or the Isle of Man.
Some products are exempt from the ban. Travellers can bring in a limited amount of infant formula milk, medical foods, and some items such as chocolate, confectionery, bread, cakes, biscuits and pasta.
Why has the UK banned visitors from bringing in meat?
The UK currently remains free of foot-and-mouth disease, so the measure hopes to prevent the spread from European countries.
The British government has also banned imports of cattle, sheep, other ruminants, pig meat and dairy products from Germany, Hungary, Slovakia and Austria.
Foot-and-mouth disease is highly contagious and can be fatal to cloven-hoofed animals, including cattle, sheep and pigs.
The disease does not pose a health risk to humans, and meat and milk from infected livestock are considered safe to consume.
“This government will do whatever it takes to protect British farmers from foot-and-mouth,” the UK’s farming minister Daniel Zeichner said.
“That is why we are further strengthening protections by introducing restrictions on personal meat and dairy imports to prevent the spread of the disease and protect Britain’s food security.”
Travel
UK and Spain travel warning: Airport and hotel strikes expected to cause disruption this Easter
Travellers in Europe this Easter weekend are being urged to check for delays or cancellations with strikes expected in several holiday hotspots.
This Easter weekend is expected to be especially busy with 11,282 flights scheduled to depart from UK airports alone, according to analytics firm Cirium.
Travellers are advised to check their flight and booking status regularly as negotiations are still ongoing in many cases, and strikes could be called off last minute.
UK: Gatwick airport workers to strike
The Unite union announced earlier this month that there would be strike action at Gatwick Airport – the UK’s second busiest airport – starting on Good Friday 18 April and ending in the early hours of the morning on 22 April.
This includes baggage handlers, check-in staff and flight dispatchers for airlines including Norwegian, Delta, TAP and Air Peace. The union says it expects the industrial action to impact around 50 flights a day, with long queues and delays at check-in counters.
The company at the heart of this dispute, Red Handling, said this week that it is confident it will find a resolution and that contingency plans will be in place over the busy Easter period.
Spain: Hotel workers to walk out in Tenerife
A planned strike by hotel industry workers will go ahead in Tenerife on 17 and 18 April.
The walkout was planned across the Canary Islands, but an agreement was reached to suspend the strike on the neighbouring islands of Gran Canaria, Lanzarote and Fuerteventura.
Workers in Tenerife, however, say that their employers have not been as willing to listen to their demands. Unions say they are still open to last-minute negotiations, which would avoid the strikes.
The Canary Islands Department of Tourism and Employment has set minimum service levels for the hospitality industry over the Easter Weekend. It would mean some basic services, such as reception and concierge or cleaning, restaurants and cooking, still have to go ahead even if a walkout happens.
The CCOO union, which called the strike, however, insists that the hospitality industry is not an essential service and has said these minimum services will not be met by the strike committee.
“The imposition of minimum services constitutes an illegitimate, disproportionate, and legally unsustainable restriction on the fundamental right to strike,” CCOO stated in a press release.
France: Train strike could be called with 48 hours notice
Members of the Sud Rail union have issued a six-week strike notice between 17 April and 2 June. Though no dates have been confirmed, a strike could take place with as little as 48 hours notice.
This will only affect train controllers working for national operator SCNF, but could mean some services are delayed or cancelled during the action.
Travel
Venice’s daytripper fee returns this week, rising to €10 for last-minute bookings
Venice’s daytripper tax is relaunching this week, and the fee has doubled to €10 for last-minute visitors.
Mayor Luigi Brugnaro stressed that the tax aims to help the city and its citizens battle overtourism and avoid huge influxes of visitors during crowded holidays and weekends.
The payment system was launched last year for a time-limited pilot program.
Venice introduced the long-discussed daytripper fee after the city narrowly escaped being placed on the UN’s list of endangered heritage sites, due largely to the impact of overtourism.
Visitors staying overnight in the historic centre are exempt from the charge as they already pay a tourist tax.
How does Venice’s entry fee work?
The new tax will be applied every Friday through Sunday and on holidays from 18 April to 27 July, for a total of 54 days.
That’s almost double the number of days it was in place last year. Tourists who don’t make reservations up to four days in advance will pay €10 instead of the usual €5.
The tax will be in force during peak hours, from 8.30 am to 4 pm.
Anyone found beyond designated control points without the required documentation will be subject to fines.
These will range from €50 to €300, plus the maximum entrance fee allowed by law, set at €10.
Officials have emphasised that the programme aims to reduce crowds on peak days, encourage longer visits and improve the quality of life for residents.
The fee is not required for anyone staying in Venice, including the mainland districts of Marghera and Mestre. Venice’s islands, including glass-making Murano, are also outside the program.
Exemptions are also issued for a variety of reasons, including to access the city for work, school or medical care, as well as to people born in Venice and residents of the Veneto region.
How can I book my ticket for Venice?
Visitors can ‘reserve’ their day in Venice on a dedicated platform.
Daytrippers pay the required fee (€5 or €10) and get a QR code that will then be checked at spot controls at seven access points around the city, including at the main train station.
Visitors with hotel reservations enter their hotel information and also get a QR code to show. They don’t have to pay, however, since their hotel bill will already include a Venice lodging fee.
Why has Venice introduced an entry fee?
Venice has long suffered under the pressure of overtourism, but officials say pre-pandemic estimates ranging from 25 to 30 million visitors a year – including daytrippers – are not reliable and that the pilot project also aimed to come up with more exact figures to help better manage the phenomenon.
By contrast, registered visitors spending the night last year numbered 4.6 million, according to city figures, down 16 per cent from pre-pandemic highs.
The pandemic delayed Venice’s plans to launch the daytripper tax, which has become a keystone of the city’s attempts to deal with overtourism.
UNESCO cited the plan when it decided not to include the city on the list of endangered world heritage sites last September, a tarnish that it similarly avoided two years earlier with the cruise ship ban through St. Mark’s Basin and the Giudecca Canal.
Cruise ships brought 1.6 million people to Venice in 2019.
Activists sounded a warning last summer when the number of tourist beds officially overtook the number of residents, which has dwindled to under 50,000 in a trend dating back decades.
They said the imbalance drains the city of services, clogging its tight alleyways and water buses with suitcase-toting tourists and pushing residents to the mainland with its conveniences.
Was the trial of the entry fee a success?
At the end of the first test phase last July, officials said the tax had netted €2.4 million, accounting for about 1,000 entrances on each of the test days.
Brugnaro responded to critics who have called it a failure and said it did not deter as many arrivals as expected.
“Venice is the first city in the world that tries to manage the problem of overtourism. We obtained important results,” the mayor said.
But some citizens’ groups and opposition councillors claim the access fee completely failed to control overtourism.
“Data offered by the control room show that on average during the period of implementation of the fee, we had about 7,000 more tourist entries than in previous years,” said Giovanni Andrea Martini, an opposition councillor.
“This shows that the access fee is not at all a system able to manage the flows.”
-
EU & the World4 days ago
How Old Are the Menendez Brothers in 2025? Lyle and Erik’s Ages Today
-
EU & the World5 days ago
Where to Stream Coachella 2025: How to Watch the Show
-
EU & the World4 days ago
Celebrities Going to Space: Katy Perry & More in the Blue Origin Crew
-
EU & the World6 days ago
Plane Crash in Boca Raton: What Happened & Updates on the Accident
-
Sports4 days ago
David Massey: “A historic edition for the Rolex Monte Carlo Masters.”
-
EU & the World4 days ago
How Did Kyren Lacy Die? Updates on the LSU Player’s Death
-
EU & the World7 days ago
Where to Watch the Masters: Can I Stream the Live Coverage?
-
EU & the World7 days ago
Jillian ‘Lauren’ Shriner: 5 Things About the Weezer Bassist’s Wife