Connect with us

Travel

2024 was a deadly year for air travel, but flying is still the safest form of transport

Published

on

With the recent spate of air accidents, travellers may feel less confident. But is flying really becoming unsafe?

2024 has fanned the flames of worries over flying, particularly in recent weeks, when more than 200 people lost their lives in two separate incidents just days apart.

Thirty-eight people died when an Azerbaijan Airlines plane crashed in Kazakhstan; four days later, 179 perished when a Jeju Air flight crash landed in South Korea.

While recent events are still ringing in the minds of many, 2024 was a year of disasters in aviation. In early January, a fiery crash in Tokyo shocked the world, leaving five members of the Japan Coast Guard dead, although passengers on the Japan Airlines plane escaped safely.

Days later, part of a plane fell off when it was departing from Portland, Oregon, leaving a gaping hole in the side of the fuselage. Again, all 177 passengers survived the emergency landing, but the fallout from the event has seen major manufacturer Boeing in the spotlight all year.

During the summer the tragic loss of a Voepass flight in Brazil claimed the lives of 62 passengers and crew.

On top of this, multiple reports of aircraft hitting severe turbulence and injuring people, including one fatality on a Singapore Airlines flight, have given travellers cause to worry about their safety.

According to the Aviation Safety Network, a total of 318 people died in aircraft accidents last year, making 2024 the deadliest year in aviation since 2018.

But is flying really becoming less safe, and should we be worried if we’ve got an upcoming trip booked?

Flying is getting safer all the time

Dr Hassan Shahidi, president and CEO of Flight Safety Foundation, a non-profit involved in all aspects of aviation safety, put things in perspective for Euronews Travel.

“In all of 2023, there were zero commercial jet fatalities,” he says. “By the time 2024 was over, the aviation industry had transported 5 billion passengers worldwide. And until just the past few days, 2024 was poised to repeat that safety record.”

According to research from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), flying is safer today than ever.

In the 2018-2022 period, the risk of dying through air travel was calculated to be 1 per every 13.7 million passenger boardings. That’s down from 1 per 7.9 million boardings in 2008-2017 and a major decrease from the 1 per every 350,000 boardings in 1968 to 1977.

Research from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Academy has shown that up to 80 per cent of aviation accidents can be attributed to human error. A mistake on the pilots’ part is thought to account for 53 per cent of accidents, while mechanical failure was considered to be at fault in just 21 per cent of cases.

Airbus studied which part of the flight was most dangerous, and found that takeoff and landing were when accidents were most likely to occur. Both of the two December 2024 crashes happened when landing, although other factors were in play.

In the Jeju Air crash, for example, there were reports of an engine being damaged after hitting a bird, and the aircraft, for an as yet unknown reason, did not have its landing gear deployed when it touched down. The investigation will be long and complex, and it’s likely to be some time before we understand exactly what happened.

“This accident involved a multitude of factors, from bird strikes to landing without landing gear and flaps,” Shahidi adds. “All of this will be thoroughly investigated, contributing factors will be determined and steps will be taken to ensure this doesn’t happen again.”

Jeju Air has been inspecting its fleet of 737 ‘next generation’ (NG) aircraft, but out of an abundance of caution. Nothing so far suggests that there is a more widespread problem with the aircraft type.

Airlines are advised to avoid warzones

The Azerbaijan Airlines crash was something a little different. Although investigations are ongoing, initial assessments suggest the aircraft may have been hit by Russian air defences, causing it to depressurise and lose control.

That assessment will bring to mind a similar situation from a decade ago. In July 2014, a Malaysia Airlines plane was shot down by Russian-backed forces using a surface-to-air missile while it was flying over eastern Ukraine. All 283 passengers and 16 crew members died.

The investigation recommended states involved in armed conflicts close their airspace, and that operators should thoroughly assess risk when routes pass over areas of conflict.

The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) publishes Conflict Zone Information Bulletins to caution air operators about potential safety threats.

However, as Janet Northcote, spokesperson for EASA, explains to Euronews Travel, “EASA does not close airspace or have the right to mandate the avoidance of airspace. But the information provided here flows into the individual airline’s own safety assessments and creates awareness of any aviation safety threat.”

So why was Azerbaijan Airlines flying over a conflict zone? Although many Western airlines have ceased operations to and over Russian airspace, numerous Middle Eastern and Asian airlines continue to operate in that area.

Carriers from Turkey, China, the UAE and other nations are not avoiding the airspace, despite the risk.

“Air travel in known conflict zones has significant risk,” Shaihid says. “Airlines must carry out risk assessment for their routes to ensure that the risks are mitigated and take an alternate route.”

Nonetheless, no European airline currently flies to Russia or through its airspace, having heeded the advice of EASA and other agencies.

Every air accident makes air travel safer

The small silver lining in the terrible year aviation has experienced is that every accident serves to make air travel safer in the future.

As Simon Calder, travel correspondent for the UK’s Independent newspaper wrote in a recent column, “All the dramatic aviation events of 2024 – fatal and otherwise – will be analysed minutely to understand what can be learnt to enhance future safety.”

In the case of both the Jeju Air and Azerbaijan Airlines crashes, the infamous ‘black boxes’ have been recovered and sent for interrogation.

These two boxes, which are actually bright orange in colour, are the Flight Data Recorder (FDR) and Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) and should shed some light on what happened prior to the crash.

Accident investigators are on the ground in Kazakhstan and South Korea gathering more evidence, a process that could take some time. Following this, collected data will be analysed in a lab to determine the cause of the crash.

A preliminary report will likely be made public in the coming weeks, although the final report will take longer.

From these reports, various recommendations will be made to avoid a similar situation in the future.

“One of the strengths of aviation safety processes is that whenever any tragedy does occur, we analyse what happened and take appropriate action to ensure, to the extent possible, that the same type of accident will not occur again,” explains Northcote.

Consider any major aviation accident, and it’s possible to see the longer-term positive effect it has had on air safety.

A collision over the Grand Canyon in June 1956, for example, between a TWA Super Constellation and a United Airlines DC-7 led to upgraded forms of air traffic control.

After TWA Flight 800 exploded in mid-air in 1996, modifications were made to ensure fuel could not be combusted by an errant spark.

Without the tragedy of 9/11, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) would never have been created. And thanks to the (still) missing Malaysia Airlines MH370, all aircraft are now tracked in real-time.

“This constant cycle of improvement is fundamental to keeping the aviation safety record strong,” says Northcote.

“We work with other regulators, for example the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in the United States and with the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), to ensure that aviation safety standards are high globally, not only in Europe.”

While manufacturers, airlines and regulators work hard to maintain safety in the skies, Northcote highlights that safe travel is a team effort.

“Aviation has in general an excellent safety record, but this is no cause for complacency,” she says. “This strong safety record can only be maintained by many individual people fulfilling their role every day to ensure that operations are safe.”

Author

  • Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Travel

From rising rents to rewilding: How tourists are rethinking their impact on the places they visit

Published

on

Tourists are increasingly aware that the way they travel matters – not just for the planet, but for the people who call popular destinations home.

That’s the key takeaway from Booking.com’s 2025 Sustainable Travel Report.

In its tenth edition, the report finds that more than half of travellers are now conscious of tourism’s impact on local communities as well as the environment.

Based on insights from 32,000 people across 34 countries, the report reveals a potential paradigm shift in how we define responsible travel.

Are good intentions enough?

Seeing the world in a more sustainable way seems to be more popular than ever.

A whopping 93 per cent of respondents to the survey, which included thousands of people across six continents, said they want to make more responsible choices and have already taken steps to do so.

That is more than double the percentage of respondents who said as much in 2016.

Simple actions, from turning off air conditioning to avoiding overcrowded hotspots, have begun to enter the mainstream, too.

But this year’s research shows that more environmentally friendly travel is only part of the story. The economic and social effects of exploring new places, from the pressure added to housing systems to paying due respect to cultural traditions, are now top of mind for many tourists.

Almost 40 per cent of respondents are seeking advice on travel outside of peak seasons or visiting alternative destinations to avoid overcrowding.

The report also reveals a disconnect between ideas and action, however.

Almost a third of respondents reported rising living costs in their home destinations due to tourism. Yet only 16 per cent believed that capping visitor numbers is the answer. Instead, many call for better investment in waste management, public transport and conservation to curb the impact of overtourism.

Many destinations are embracing this shift in priorities

Some places are adapting to evolving traveller expectations.

Chile, for instance, is actively courting “responsible high-spend tourists” – people who, according to the country’s tourism board, seek immersive, culturally sensitive experiences. They are also willing to spend more to support local businesses and conservation efforts​.

To target these travellers, the country is expanding protected areas, supporting rewilding projects and investing in eco-friendly travel options.

In theGalapagos, where fragile ecosystems face enormous pressure from tourism, some cruise operators are rethinking their business models. Itineraries now prioritise sustainable activities​, with guides reminding guests of the impact even a single footprint can have on the environment.

The islands have also pushed back against overtourism by doublingentry fees.

Others are feeling the pressure

The situation is more strained elsewhere as increasing visitor numbers overwhelm some destinations.

After a trial last year, Venice relaunched its day-tripper tax in 2025 to help manage the flood of tourists that strain its historic core. Visitors who fail to pay can face steep fines​. But the €10 fee has done little to dissuade travellers from descending upon the city en masse.

Last summer, the number of tourist beds in Venice overtook the number of residents.

Spain has seen a rise in anti-tourism sentiment. In destinations likeBarcelona,Mallorca andTenerife, locals have protested the impact of short-term rentals, noise and congestion.

Local governments are beginning to act, but change has been slow and piecemeal.

Outside La Sagrada Familia – one of Barcelona’s most photographed places – officials are introducing aselfie space to ease overcrowding. But the plan seems unlikely to stem the tide of tourists queuing up to see Gaudí’s famously unfinished cathedral.

Tourism needs clearer direction

The findings of the 2025 Sustainable Travel Report underscore a key challenge for the industry: aligning growing traveller awareness with meaningful, accessible action.

“To ensure that destinations can continue to be enjoyed by both locals and visitors alike, tourism, infrastructure and innovation need to keep pace with travellers’ good intent,” says Danielle D’Silva, director of sustainability at Booking.com.

The app itself is likely to contribute to these causes. D’Silva says the company plans to feature hotels, homestays and guesthouses that have reputable sustainability certifications or provide training and guidance for its accommodation partners.

With so many travellers wanting to make more sustainable choices, the question now is whether next year’s figures will show intent turning into impact.

Author

  • Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Travel

Egypt travel: Pyramids of Giza revamp project hopes to curb congestion and aggressive vendors

Published

on

Millions of visitors travel to Egypt each year to see the iconic Pyramids of Giza.

Despite being one of the world’s most famous ancient sites, the experience leaves many travellers with unpleasant memories.

For years, the UNESCO World Heritage Site has been plagued by poor management, unregulated and aggressive vendors, and reports of animal cruelty.

Now, Egypt is taking steps to clean up the Pyramids of Giza – but the revamp has got off to a rocky start.

Vendors protest relocation to new zones

Experiences of overcrowding and persistent tour touters have tarnished many tourists’ experiences of the Giza Plateau – home to several pyramids and the Great Sphinx.

The Egyptian government’s newly unveiled plan aims to relaunch the site with improved management and regulations.

The project, led by Orascom Pyramids Entertainment Services Company, is reportedly set to cost $51 million (€45 million).

This week, a new access point to the complex on the Fayoum Highway was tested, replacing the historic entrance near Marriott Mena House, which frequently suffers from traffic jams and congestion.

But the trial run faced pushback from horse and camel tour operators, who blocked vehicles from entering in a protest against their relocation to new designated parking areas.

They say these are too far from the entrance and will damage business. The vendors have long been accused of harassment and alleged extortion by visitors.

Businessman Naguib Sawiris, the founder of Orascom Telecom Holding and Orascom Investment Holding, wrote on X that sellers who refuse to move to the new zone area would be banned.

“The well-being of the public and preservation of this treasure is far more important than catering to the interests of 2,000 individuals who have caused harm to the country for years,” he posted.

Pyramids of Giza adopt electric vehicles

The new measures also prohibit private vehicles and tour buses from entering the plateau, instead providing visitors and their guides with eco-friendly electric vehicles to get around the site.

While the transition aims to improve the sustainability of the complex, some visitors have complained on social media about the availability of the vehicles, saying they’ve been forced to wait or walk in the heat.

Orascom issued a statement in response, stating that 45 electric buses had been made available on the site and are scheduled to run every five minutes.

The revamp will also see several tombs restored, the introduction of online ticketing and a new visitor centre.

Visitors warned against animal tours at Pyramids of Giza

Some hope that the relocation of tour vendors is also a step towards bringing an end to animal cruelty reported at the site.

A recent investigation by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) found instances of routine abuse and animals left to rot at the side of the road.

“PETA has documented the routine punching, kicking, whipping, and starving of horses and camels at the pyramids,” says PETA Asia Vice President Jason Baker.

“Animals are literally ridden to death and then dumped like rubbish outside the gate. The Pyramids of Giza should symbolise Egypt’s beauty and history – not unchecked animal abuse. The Egyptian government must act to remove these suffering animals from Giza.”

The campaign group is urging tourists not to engage the services of these animal tour companies.

Author

  • Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Travel

When is the Sistine Chapel closed? What to know about visiting Rome following Pope Francis’ death

Published

on

Tourists who have booked to visit Rome in the coming weeks will experience the city during a rare historical moment.

Following the death of Pope Francis on 21 April, a series of religious rituals and procedures will be enacted that might impact travel plans.

The Argentinian-born pontiff died on Monday of a stroke, which triggered a coma and “irreversible” heart failure, the Vatican announced.

The Sistine Chapel will be closed to the public while it is used for voting on the new pope – a process that will see the famous room closed for over a week.

Crowds and queues around the Vatican are expected to be particularly heavy, especially given the celebrations for the Catholic Church’s 2025 Jubilee Year are already drawing an increased number of visitors.

Here’s what to know about expected travel disruptions in Rome, or, if you’re planning a trip to witness some of the religious traditions, where you can participate in them.

When will the Sistine Chapel be closed?

Travellers to Rome in the next few weeks have been warned to expect closures, visitor restrictions and crowds at some of the city’s main attractions.

Rome’s key tourist sites within the Vatican – the heart of the Catholic Church – will now be absorbed by mourning and reelection procedures.

Around 15-20 days after the pontiff’s death, the conclave will begin, a storied process to determine the next pope.

This strictly confidential gathering sees Roman Catholic cardinals locked inside the Sistine Chapel until a decision is made.

As such, the room adorned by Michelangelo’s frescoed tour de force will be closed for about a week before the conclave begins and will remain closed for the entire duration of the process.

It will likely open again a couple of days after the conclave ends, as it has done after the death of previous Popes.

The Vatican City State has announced that the Sistine Chapel will be closed to the public from Monday 28 April, for the requirements of the conclave.

The chapel is accessed through the Vatican Museums. These will remain open to visitors with all other parts accessible, including the Raphael Rooms, according to tour operator Through Eternity Tours.

The Vatican Museums and the Castel Gandolfo Museum Complex will, however, be closed on 26 April as a sign of mourning for the funeral of Pope Francis.

Tours of the Necropolis of the Via Triumphalis and the Vatican Gardens will be suspended for security reasons, however, as the cardinals are bused back and forth from the chapel to their accommodation through the grounds.

The Vatican Museums states that all tickets, including for the Sistine Chapel, are non-refundable and dates, times or names cannot be modified.

If you have purchased tickets through a third-party operator, you should check their website or contact them about refunds or date changes.

Long queues and dress codes for St Peter’s Basilica

Tourists should expect limited access to St Peter’s Basilica, where Pope Francis’ body is now lying in state from today, 23 April.

As mourners flock to pay their respects, tourists wanting to visit the church should expect lengthy queues and heightened security.

The dress code for visiting the sacred site will be strictly enforced. This includes having shoulders and knees covered and avoiding wearing short skirts, shorts, flip-flops and sleeveless tops.

Some areas of the basilica may not be accessible, including the dome. Guided tours to the basilica are suspended as access is via the Sistine Chapel.

Pope Francis requested to be buried in the Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore, a majestic UNESCO-designated sanctuary containing a piece of the Holy Crib and a venerated icon of the Virgin Mary as the protector of the Roman people.

Access to the church is likely to be restricted due to funeral preparations and the burial.

Millions expected in Rome for Pope’s funeral

While it may be disappointing to forgo seeing the Sistine Chapel or St Peter’s Basilica, a visit in this period can also be a once-in-a-lifetime experience (the Italian expression for ‘once in a blue moon’ is ‘every time a pope dies’).

Visitors from around the world are expected to descend on Rome in the coming weeks for a chance to witness this monumental event for the Catholic Church.

“Historically, during the passing of a pope – as we experienced firsthand in April 2005 during the death of Pope John Paul II – travellers witnessed a profound moment of history,” James Ridgway, CEO of Christian travel specialist ETS, told Travel Weekly.

“While some sites around St. Peter’s Basilica and Vatican City experienced closures or restricted access, many travellers were able to participate in public gatherings, memorials and prayer services, creating a deeply meaningful experience.”

If you are planning a short-notice trip to participate in some of the funeral and reelection events, you should expect higher flight prices.

“We’ll definitely see an increase in flight prices to Rome and to Italy over the next few weeks, as the faithful flock to pay their respects and potentially to see the announcement of the new Pope,” Angus Kidman, travel expert at Finder, told Australian site news.com.au.

Hotel prices in Rome are also likely to rise as demand increases, says Tim Hentschel, the co-founder and CEO of travel company HotelPlanner, while some shops and restaurants may be closed as a sign of respect.

The Pope’s body will be lying in state for public viewing in St Peter’s from 23 April until Saturday, 26 April, when the funeral will take place in St Peter’s Square.

The chapel where he is on display is accessible on 23 April from 11 am to midnight, 24 April from 7 am to midnight, and 25 April from 7 am to 7 pm.

The funeral is expected to draw huge crowds, possibly larger than that of Pope John Paul II in 2005, which was attended by approximately four million people.

Where to witness the announcement of the new pope

When the conclave begins, St. Peter’s Square will remain open, but it will be packed with visitors and media.

The outcome of voting rounds is indicated via smoke released from the chapel chimney – black for inconclusive, white for the successful election of a new pope.

According to the National Catholic Reporter, you can see the smoke from the chapel twice daily – around noon after the first two ballots and again at 7 pm after the last round of voting.

White smoke might appear earlier, at around 10.30 am or 5.30 pm.

Author

  • Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 EuroTimes

Exit mobile version