Connect with us

Politics

European Parliament Press Kit for the European Council of 21 and 22 March 2024 | News

Published

on

European Parliament President Roberta Metsola will represent the European Parliament at the summit, address the heads of state or government at 15.00, and hold a press conference after her speech.

When: Press conference at around 16.00 on 21 March

Where: European Council press room and via Parliament’s webstreaming or EbS.

At their meeting in Brussels, heads of state or government will focus on Russia’s war against Ukraine and the EU’s continued support for the country, the war in the Gaza Strip, European security and defence, enlargement, the EU’s response to the current concerns in the agricultural sector and on economic coordination.

Russia’s war against Ukraine

In a joint statement issued on 23 February, the Presidents of the EU institutions stressed that “the European Union will always support Ukraine’s independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognised borders.

Russia and its leadership bear sole responsibility for this war and its global consequences, as well as for the serious crimes committed. We remain determined to hold them to account, including for the crime of aggression. (…)

The European Union will continue its strong and unwavering political, military, financial, economic, diplomatic and humanitarian support to help Ukraine defend itself, protect its people, its cities and its critical infrastructure, restore its territorial integrity, bring back the thousands of deported children, and bring the war to an end.

We will continue to address Ukraine’s pressing military and defence needs, including deliveries of urgently needed ammunition and missiles. (…) We are also working on future security commitments which will help Ukraine defend itself, resist destabilisation efforts and deter acts of aggression in the future.”

In a resolution adopted on 29 February, MEPs took stock of the two years since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022. Highlighting how the war has fundamentally changed the geopolitical situation in Europe and beyond, they say the main objective is for Ukraine to win the war, warning of serious consequences if that does not happen. MEPs say that other authoritarian regimes are watching how the conflict develops to assess their own leeway for enacting aggressive foreign policies.

For Kyiv to win the war, there should be “no self-imposed restriction on military assistance to Ukraine”, with Parliament reaffirming the need to provide the country with whatever is needed to regain full control over its internationally recognised territory.

All EU and NATO allies should support Ukraine militarily with no less than 0.25% of their GDP annually, MEPs argue, while urging EU countries to immediately enter into dialogue with defence companies to ensure increased production and deliveries of ammunition, shells and missiles to Ukraine, which should be prioritised over orders from other third countries

The resolution underlines the urgent need for a solid legal regime to allow Russian state-owned assets frozen by the EU to be confiscated and used for reconstruction in Ukraine and the compensation of victims of the war. Russia must be obliged to pay reparations imposed on it to ensure that it contributes substantially to rebuilding Ukraine.

On 12 March, Parliament adopted a directive, agreed with member states, on criminalising the violation and circumvention of EU sanctions. It will introduce a common definition of, and minimum penalties for, violations.

EU sanctions can consist of freezing funds and assets (including crypto-assets), travel bans, arms embargoes, and restrictions on business sectors. While sanctions are adopted at the EU level, enforcement relies on member states, amongst which the definitions of sanction violations and associated penalties vary. The new law sets consistent definitions for violations, which would include acts such as not freezing funds, not respecting travel bans or arms embargoes, transferring funds to persons subject to sanctions, or doing business with state-owned entities of countries under sanction. Providing financial services or legal advisory services in violation of sanctions will also become a punishable offence.

The directive ensures the punishment for violating and circumventing sanctions is dissuasive by making them criminal offences carrying prison sentences of a maximum of five years in all member states.

In a resolution adopted on 29 February, the European Parliament strongly condemns the murder of Alexei Navalny and gives its full support to Yulia Navalnaya in her determination to continue his work. MEPs stress that the full criminal and political responsibility for his death lies with the Russian state, and its president Vladimir Putin in particular, who should be held accountable.

Stressing that the people of Russia cannot be confused with the “warmongering, autocratic and kleptocratic regime of the Kremlin”, MEPs call on the EU and its member states to continue to show unfailing solidarity and actively support independent Russian civil society and the democratic opposition.

Parliament demands that the EU, its member states and likeminded partners around the world continue their political, economic, financial, and military support for Ukraine as the best answer to the current oppressive and aggressive practices by the Kremlin regime. Ukraine’s decisive victory may lead to genuine changes in the Russian Federation, in particular deimperialisation, decolonialisation and refederalisation, all of which are necessary conditions for establishing democracy in Russia.

Yulia Navalnaya, the widow of murdered Russian anti-corruption activist Alexei Navalny, addressed the European Parliament on 28 February.

In her speech, Ms Navalnaya accused Russian authorities, led by President Vladimir Putin, of having orchestrated Mr Navalny’s killing. She said that his public murder had once again shown everyone that “Putin is capable of anything and that you cannot negotiate with him”. She also expressed concern that none of the EU’s current restrictive measures have stopped Russia’s aggression in Ukraine.

To this end, Ms Navalnaya called for more innovative ideas to defeat Putin’s regime, both domestically and its actions towards its neighbours. “If you really want to defeat Putin, you have to become an innovator (…). You cannot hurt Putin with another resolution or another set of sanctions that is no different from the previous ones (…). You are not dealing with a politician but with a bloody mobster (…). The most important thing is the people close to Putin, his friends, associates, and keepers of the mafia’s money (…). You, and all of us, must fight this criminal gang.”

Further reading

Joint Statement by the Presidents of the European Union Institutions on the occasion of the 2 year anniversary of the Russian invasion of Ukraine

Parliament calls on the EU to give Ukraine whatever it needs to defeat Russia

EU sanctions: new rules to crack down on violations

MEPs: EU must actively support Russia’s democratic opposition

Yulia Navalnaya: “If you want to defeat Putin, fight his criminal gang”

Debate 12 March 2024: Preparation of the European Council meeting of 21 and 22 March 2024

Debate 13 March 2024: Need to address the urgent concerns surrounding Ukrainian children forcibly deported to Russia

Parliament wants tougher enforcement of EU sanctions against Russia

A long-term solution for Ukraine’s funding needs

How the EU is supporting Ukraine

EU stands with Ukraine

MEPs to contact

David McALLISTER, (EPP, DE), Chair of the Committee on Foreign Affairs

Nathalie LOISEAU (Renew, FR), Chair of the Subcommittee on Security and Defence

Michael GAHLER (EPP, DE), standing rapporteur on Ukraine

Andrius KUBILIUS (EPP, LT), standing rapporteur on Russia

Sophie in ’t Veld (Renew, the Netherlands), rapporteur on the violation of Union restrictive measures

War in the Gaza Strip

In a resolution adopted on 14 March, MEPs call on Israel to immediately allow and facilitate full aid delivery into and throughout Gaza via all existing crossings, underlining the urgent need for rapid, safe and unhindered humanitarian access.

They reiterate their call for an immediate and permanent ceasefire to address the looming risk of mass starvation in Gaza and the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages. The International Committee of the Red Cross must be given immediate access to all Israeli hostages being held in Gaza to provide them with medical care.

There can be no prospect of peace, security, stability and prosperity for Gaza or for Palestinian-Israeli reconciliation, MEPs warn, as long as Hamas and other terrorist groups play any role in Gaza.

Parliament also strongly condemns the rise in extremist settler violence and attacks by the Israeli armed forces against Palestinians in the West Bank, attacks that have already killed hundreds and injured thousands of Palestinian civilians. MEPs strongly condemn the acceleration of the illegal settlement of Palestinian land, which constitutes a violation of international law. They are deeply concerned about the risk of escalation in the conflict, in particular in Lebanon.

In a resolution adopted on 18 January, Parliament condemned in the strongest possible terms the despicable terrorist attacks committed by Hamas against Israel. MEPs also denounced the disproportionate Israeli military response, which has caused a civilian death toll on an unprecedented scale.

Israel has the right to defend itself within the limits of international law, they stress, which implies that all parties in a conflict must distinguish, at all times, between combatants and civilians, that attacks must only be directed at military objectives, and that civilians and civilian objects must not be targeted in the attacks.

The resolution also calls for a European initiative to put the two-state solution back on track and emphasises the absolute necessity of immediately relaunching the peace process. It welcomes the European Union and the Arab League’s Peace Day Effort for Middle East Peace, which was launched just before the attacks took place on 7 October.

Further reading

Parliament calls on Israel to open all crossings to Gaza for humanitarian aid

Israel-Hamas war: MEPs call for a permanent ceasefire under two conditions

MEPs condemn Hamas attack on Israel and call for a humanitarian pause

Resolution: The despicable terrorist attacks by Hamas against Israel, Israel’s right to defend itself in line with humanitarian and international law and the humanitarian situation in Gaza

President Metsola at the European Council: EU must remain coherent and united

Leading MEPs condemn attack by Hamas terrorists against Israel

MEPs to contact

David McALLISTER, (EPP, DE), Chair of the Committee on Foreign Affairs

European security and defence

In two reports on the EU’s foreign, security and defence policy, adopted on 28 February, MEPs warn that the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine has sparked a series of global economic shocks and added significant destabilising pressure on countries in the Western Balkans and the Eastern Partnership.

They want the EU to reform its neighbourhood policy and accelerate the enlargement process, while advancing institutional and decision-making reforms, including the publication of a roadmap for future work by the summer of 2024. MEPs urge the EU to improve its capacity to act in response to, as well as to pre-empt, global crises.

With US-China competition as a backdrop, Parliament is concerned about the increasing relevance of more exclusive formats of cooperation and emphasises that traditional multilateral forums – in particular the UN and its agencies –should be the EU’s preferred forums for cooperation.

With the focus on Russia’s illegal, unprovoked and unjustified war of aggression against Ukraine, Parliament highlights the role played by Iran, Belarus, North Korea and China in supporting the Kremlin’s war machine. MEPs say Russia’s war is part of a wider strategy to undermine the rules-based international order and underline that the EU will continue to support Kyiv with the necessary military means to end the conflict.

MEPs also demand an increase to and acceleration of the EU’s financial and military assistance, stressing that Ukraine’s military victory and the country’s future integration in the EU and NATO are necessary to guarantee Europe’s security, stability and sustainable peace.

Further reading

Foreign policy, security and defence: the EU should focus on strategic alliances

MEPs to contact

Nathalie LOISEAU (Renew, FR), Chair of the Subcommittee on Security and Defence

David McAllister (EPP, Germany), Chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee and rapporteur on the Common Foreign and Security Policy

Sven Mikser (S&D, Estonia), rapporteur on the common security and defence policy

Enlargement

On 19 March, MEPs on the Committee on Foreign Affairs discussed the future of EU enlargement with the foreign ministers of Austria, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovenia and the deputy ministers or secretaries of state of Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Greece and Hungary.

In the 2023 annual report on Common Foreign and Security Policy, MEPs warn that the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine has significantly destabilised countries in the Western Balkans and the Eastern Partnership. According to the report, this jeopardises EU security. To address this, MEPs recommend that the EU reforms its neighbourhood policy and accelerates the enlargement process.

In February, Parliament adopted a report calling for institutional and financial reforms to ensure the EU’s capacity to absorb new members. With the Ukraine Facility, it approved long-term funding for Ukraine to aid its recovery and modernisation efforts and to help it on its way to EU membership. MEPs also supported the Reform and Growth Facility for the Western Balkans to bolster the EU’s partners in the region by facilitating extensive socio-economic reforms, enhancing rule of law fundamental rights, and accelerating the economic alignment of these partners with the EU standards.

In a resolution adopted on 13 December, Parliament called the EU’s enlargement policy one of the strongest geopolitical tools at its disposal and a strategic investment in peace and security. MEPs are urging the European Council to open accession negotiations with Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova. Provided that certain steps are taken, MEPs say that accession talks should also be opened with Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Georgia should be granted candidate status.

MEPs also stress that the EU should establish a clear enlargement timetable for candidate countries to conclude accession negotiations by 2030. There should, however, be no fast-track route to membership. MEPs insist that the so-called Copenhagen criteria must be fulfilled to ensure that candidate and potential candidate countries demonstrate a consistent and enduring commitment to democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for the protection of minorities, and economic reforms.

Further reading

Serbia and Kosovo must work to de-escalate the situation in northern Kosovo

Montenegro’s EU accession progress is losing momentum

Parliament pushes for start of EU accession talks with Moldova

MEPs call on EU and Türkiye to look for alternative ways to cooperate

MEPs assess the situation in Albania and Bosnia and Herzegovina

MEPs to contact

David McAllister (EPP, Germany), Chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee

Tonino Picula (S&D, HR), rapporteur on Montenegro

Nacho Sánchez Amor (S&D, ES), rapporteur on Türkiye

Isabel Santos (S&D, PT), rapporteur on Albania

Paulo Rangel (EPP, PT), rapporteur on Bosnia and Herzegovina

Agriculture

The Commission’s simplification package for farmers and the contribution of the agricultural sector to the EU’s climate objectives were discussed in two debates with commissioners in the Agriculture Committee on 19 March. MEPs debated with the Commissioner for Agriculture, Janusz Wojciechowski, actions that the Commission is proposing to reduce the administrative burden on farmers. MEPs discussed the agricultural sector’s contribution to the EU’s climate objectives with the Commissioner for Climate Action, Wopke Hoekstra.

The debate with Commissioner Wojciechowski follows an exchange of views on the same topic MEPs had with Commission representatives during a committee meeting on 26 February. Link to re-watch the exchange.

In a letter sent on 20 February to Commissioner Wojciechowski, the Chair of the Agriculture Committee, Norbert Lins (EPP, DE), supported by the majority of political groups, put forward proposals to tackle current difficulties encountered by European farmers.

A plenary debate about sustainable and fairly-rewarded EU agriculture took place on 7 February. Link to re-watch the debate.

On 12 March, MEPs debated the need to impose sanctions on the import of Russian and Belarusian food and agricultural products to the EU and to ensure stability of EU agricultural production. You can watch the debate here.

MEPs to contact

Norbert Lins (EPP, DE), Chair of the Agriculture Committee

European economic coordination

On 13 March, MEPs adopted a resolution outlining their concerns and priorities for the next cycle of economic coordination between member states. They expressed their concerns about the economic situation, persistent economic uncertainty, and weak growth, competitiveness and productivity in the EU.

MEPs add that many member states are suffering from structural challenges that hinder their growth potential and that a lack of public and private investment in certain member states is blocking the potential for socially balanced and sustainable growth. They also stress that sufficient public investment is crucial to achieve the main objectives of the reform of the EU’s economic governance framework and to address the current and future priorities of the Union, such as financing the green and digital transitions.

Further reading

European economic coordination: Prioritise prudent investment and reform EU economies, MEPs say

MEPs to contact

René Repasi (S&D, DE), rapporteur

Author

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

EU Parliament Tackles Steel Industry, Fundamental Rights, and Budget Priorities in Plenary Session

Published

on

eu-parliament-tackles-steel-industry,-fundamental-rights,-and-budget-priorities-in-plenary-session

Strasbourg, 2 April 2025 – The European Parliament convenes today for a busy plenary session, addressing critical issues ranging from the future of the EU’s steel industry to threats to fundamental rights in Hungary, alongside votes on the bloc’s 2026 budget priorities. With debates spanning energy-intensive industries, security, and human rights, MEPs engaged with key EU figures, including Commission Executive Vice-Presidents and Polish Minister for EU Affairs Adam Szłapka, who represented the rotating EU Council presidency.

Steel and Energy-Intensive Industries Take Center Stage

The day kicked off at 9:00 with a debate on a new action plan aimed at ensuring a competitive and decarbonized steel and metals industry in Europe. MEPs, joined by Commission Executive Vice-President Stéphane Séjourné and Minister Szłapka, discussed strategies to bolster the sector amid global competition and the EU’s ambitious climate goals. Baptiste Chatain, spokesperson for the EP’s Industry Committee, emphasized the importance of balancing economic viability with sustainability, noting that a resolution on the plan will be voted on Thursday.

From 10:30, the focus shifted to the broader landscape of energy-intensive industries. Vice-President Séjourné outlined the Commission’s approach to supporting these sectors, which are pivotal to the EU’s economic backbone but face mounting pressure to adapt to green policies. The discussions underscored the delicate interplay between industrial competitiveness and the bloc’s net-zero ambitions.

Hungary’s Fundamental Rights Under Scrutiny

At around 15:00, attention turned to Hungary, where recent legislative changes have raised alarm bells over their impact on fundamental rights. MEPs debated the issue with Commissioner Conor McGrath and Minister Szłapka, focusing on concerns about democratic backsliding, media freedom, and judicial independence. Kyriakos Klosidis, spokesperson for the EP’s Institutional Affairs team, highlighted the session as a critical moment to assess Hungary’s compliance with EU values, with outcomes likely to influence future relations between Budapest and Brussels.

Budget Priorities for 2026: Security and Sustainability

At noon, MEPs voted on their priorities for the 2026 EU budget, a draft text that emphasizes strengthening security and defense capabilities, economic resilience, and climate action. The resolution also calls for reinforcing the single market to boost competitiveness. Rapporteur Eszter Zalán, who will address the press at 14:00, stressed the need for a budget that reflects the EU’s evolving challenges, particularly in light of geopolitical tensions and environmental imperatives.

Security, Social Europe, and Cyprus

The afternoon featured a debate at 16:00 on military mobility, with MEPs assessing the role of cross-border transport infrastructure in bolstering Europe’s security. Commissioner Margaritis Tzitzikostas and Minister Szłapka joined the discussion, framed by Russia’s ongoing war in Ukraine, which has heightened the urgency of such investments.

Earlier, at 13:00, a debate on the cost-of-living crisis saw MEPs, Vice-President Roxana Mînzatu, and Szłapka explore ways to safeguard jobs, wages, and healthcare amid economic strain. Meanwhile, at 11:50, EP President Roberta Metsola delivered a statement on UN-led efforts to resolve the Cyprus problem, followed by remarks from political group leaders, signaling continued EU support for a negotiated settlement.

Roma Rights and Global Human Rights

From 18:00, MEPs and Commissioner Hadja Lahbib tackled discrimination against Roma communities, discussing strategies to protect their rights and integrate them into the EU’s social fabric. Later, the evening session shifted to urgent human rights concerns, with debates on the prosecution of journalists in Cameroon, Iran’s execution spree, and repression under Belarusian leader Alexander Lukashenka. Resolutions on these issues will be voted on Thursday.

Additional Votes and Closing Notes

The midday voting session also covered the EU’s foreign and security policies for 2024, human rights globally, and a fisheries agreement with Guinea-Bissau, among other topics. Live coverage of the plenary is available on Parliament’s webstreaming platform and EbS+, offering a window into the EU’s legislative pulse.

As the session unfolds, the European Parliament continues to navigate a complex landscape of industrial transformation, democratic integrity, and global responsibility, setting the stage for pivotal decisions in the days ahead. For more details, the EP’s newsletter and plenary resources provide comprehensive insights into this dynamic agenda.

Author

Continue Reading

Politics

EU Stands Firm on Human Rights Amid Global Challenges, Kallas Tells European Parliament

Published

on

eu-stands-firm-on-human-rights-amid-global-challenges,-kallas-tells-european-parliament

Strasbourg, April 1, 2025 – In a powerful address to the European Parliament plenary session on the 2024 Annual Report on Human Rights and Democracy in the World, High Representative and Vice-President Kaja Kallas underscored the European Union’s unwavering commitment to defending human rights and democracy amid a turbulent global landscape. Delivered on April 1, 2025, in Strasbourg, the speech highlighted both the mounting threats to the rules-based international order and the EU’s proactive efforts to counter them.

Kallas opened her remarks by thanking Rapporteur Isabel Wiseler Lima and other contributors to the Parliament’s report, before drawing on her recent address to the United Nations Security Council. She emphasized that the principles enshrined in the UN Charter—peace, prosperity, human rights, dignity, and development—are under unprecedented strain. “Eighty years on, we see these principles under heavy fire,” she said, pointing to violations of international law, democratic backsliding, and assaults on gender equality and media freedom.

The High Representative singled out Russia’s ongoing war against Ukraine as a stark example of this erosion, calling it “a direct challenge to the rules-based international order and an assault on sovereignty.” She also referenced the conflict between Israel and Gaza as a sobering reminder of the fragility of human rights in wartime. Closer to home, she noted the growing threat posed by authoritarian regimes, a concern echoed in the Parliament’s 2024 report.

Yet, amid these challenges, Kallas struck a note of cautious optimism. She cited the fall of the Assad regime in Syria in December 2024 as a historic turning point, ending 54 years of dictatorship. “There is hope, nonetheless,” she said, stressing that the EU must work to ensure the rights of all Syrians are protected during the country’s fragile transition.

A Steadfast Partner in Turbulent Times

Kallas outlined the EU’s robust response to global human rights crises, positioning the bloc as a reliable and predictable partner. In 2024 alone, the EU supported over 10,000 high-risk human rights defenders, adding to a total of 80,000 individuals aided since 2015. Just two weeks prior to her speech, the EU adopted a €349 million funding package to bolster human rights and democracy initiatives worldwide through 2027. This commitment, she said, extends to countering pushback against gender equality and the rights of women, girls, and LGBTIQ+ individuals.

The EU’s support for the United Nations human rights framework also took center stage. Kallas reaffirmed the bloc’s advocacy for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and its push for accountability through mechanisms like the International Criminal Court (ICC). “Respect for international humanitarian law by state and non-state actors, and accountability for violations committed, are the cornerstone for peace and security,” she declared. She revealed that she met with the ICC President in March 2025 to reinforce the EU’s backing, amid discussions on enhancing financial and diplomatic support for the Court.

The EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime, established in 2020, has proven a vital tool, with swift measures imposed in 2024 targeting human rights abusers in Russia, the Middle East, and North Korea. “This demonstrates our determination to strengthen our role in addressing serious human rights violations and abuses worldwide,” Kallas said.

Democracy in Action

Reflecting on 2024 as a “super election year,” with over 75 countries holding elections, Kallas praised the role of EU Election Observation Missions in safeguarding electoral integrity and democratic governance. She pledged continued support for parliaments, independent media, and democratic actors operating in hostile environments, promising close collaboration with the European Parliament in these efforts.

In her closing remarks, Kallas framed the defense of human rights as inseparable from the pursuit of peace. “Peace is not simply the absence of war; it is active cultivation of justice,” she said, emphasizing that human dignity and rights are foundational to lasting stability. She called on the EU to leverage its values as a strategic asset, fostering partnerships with third countries based on sustainable progress and mutual benefit.

A Call to Unity

Kallas concluded with a rallying cry for unity, urging the Parliament to stand firm against the erosion of the EU’s core principles. “The European Union is founded on peace, democracy, and unity,” she said. “We must make very clear that we will not tolerate the erosion of these rights and freedoms that really define us.”

As the High Representative prepares to release her own 2024 human rights and democracy report, her speech served as both a sobering assessment of global challenges and a resolute affirmation of the EU’s leadership in confronting them. With the European Parliament as a key ally, Kallas signaled that the bloc’s commitment to human rights remains a cornerstone of its identity—and its future.

Author

Continue Reading

Politics

Political Turmoil Spans Continents: Dutch “Ribbons Debacle” and Trump’s Third-Term Ambitions

Published

on

political-turmoil-spans-continents:-dutch-“ribbons-debacle”-and-trump’s-third-term-ambitions

April 1, 2025 – From The Hague to Washington, D.C., political storms are brewing, shaking the foundations of governance on both sides of the Atlantic. In the Netherlands, a seemingly trivial dispute over ribbons has escalated into a full-blown confrontation between the Tweede Kamer and PVV Minister Marjolein Faber, threatening her tenure. Meanwhile, in the United States, former and current President Donald Trump has reignited constitutional debates by musing about a third term, while his administration purges career prosecutors perceived as disloyal.

The Netherlands: Ribbons Ignite a Firestorm

In The Hague, what began as a minor disagreement has spiraled into a high-stakes showdown. Minister Marjolein Faber, a prominent figure in the far-right Party for Freedom (PVV), finds herself at the center of controversy dubbed the “ribbons debacle.” Though details remain murky, the dispute reportedly stems from Faber’s decision to mandate—or perhaps ban—certain symbolic ribbons in official settings, a move critics in the Tweede Kamer, the Dutch House of Representatives, have branded as authoritarian overreach.

The clash has exposed deeper tensions between Faber’s hardline policies and the coalition government’s fragile unity. Opposition lawmakers accuse her of leveraging her position to push a divisive ideological agenda, while her supporters argue she’s defending national values against progressive excess. By Tuesday morning, the rhetoric had escalated to the point of action: a no-confidence motion against Faber was formally tabled, setting the stage for a contentious vote that could topple her from office.

“This isn’t just about ribbons—it’s about power, principle, and the direction of this country,” said one MP, speaking anonymously ahead of the debate. Political analysts suggest that even if Faber survives the motion, the episode could weaken the PVV’s influence within the coalition, with ripple effects for upcoming policy battles.

United States: Trump’s Third-Term Trial Balloon

Across the ocean, Donald Trump continues to dominate headlines with a provocative suggestion that has constitutional scholars scrambling for their textbooks. Speaking at a rally in Ohio on Monday night, the recently re-elected president floated the idea of seeking a third term, a notion that would defy the 22nd Amendment, which limits U.S. presidents to two terms. “I’ve done so much—maybe we need more time to finish the job,” Trump quipped to a roaring crowd, leaving it unclear whether he was serious or merely stoking his base.

The remark has reignited a perennial debate about executive power in America. Legal experts are divided: some argue the Constitution’s text is ironclad, while others point to historical precedents of bending norms—like Franklin Roosevelt’s four terms before the amendment’s ratification in 1951. Trump’s allies in Congress have already begun testing the waters, with one House Republican suggesting a repeal of the 22nd Amendment might be “worth discussing.”

Critics, however, see the comment as part of a broader pattern of norm-breaking. “This is a dangerous flirtation with autocracy,” warned Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) in a statement Tuesday. Public reaction is similarly polarized, with social media ablaze over whether Trump’s musings are a masterstroke of political theater or a genuine threat to democracy.

Loyalty Purge at Justice

Adding fuel to the fire, the Trump administration announced the dismissal of several career Justice Department prosecutors this week, a move insiders say reflects a loyalty test gone nuclear. The fired officials, some with decades of service, were reportedly seen as insufficiently aligned with Trump’s agenda, particularly his calls to investigate political rivals. Attorney General nominee Mike Davis defended the decision, stating, “The president needs a team he can trust to drain the swamp.”

The purge has drawn sharp rebukes from legal circles and former DOJ officials, who warn it undermines the department’s independence. “This isn’t about loyalty—it’s about turning justice into a political weapon,” said Preet Bharara, a former U.S. Attorney ousted by Trump in 2017. Democrats in Congress are now vowing to investigate, though their leverage in a Republican-controlled Senate remains limited.

A Tale of Two Crises

While the Dutch “ribbons debacle” and Trump’s third-term gambit differ in scale and stakes, they share a common thread: the erosion of political norms under pressure from populist figures. In The Hague, Faber’s fate hangs in the balance as lawmakers weigh ideology against stability. In Washington, Trump’s provocations test the resilience of a constitutional framework already strained by years of partisan warfare.

As debates rage in both capitals, the coming days promise more drama. Will Faber weather the no-confidence storm? Can Trump’s third-term rhetoric translate into action? For now, the world watches as these parallel sagas unfold, each a microcosm of the turbulent politics defining 2025.

Author

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 EuroTimes