Connect with us

Politics

Bureau adopts further decision on strengthening transparency and accountability

Published

on

Bureau decision will increase transparency on interest representatives’ participation in some 12 000 events held on Parliament’s premises.

The Bureau also stated its firm commitment to full and rapid implementation of the reform plan.

Implementing the reform plan endorsed by Parliament’s Group leaders and proposed by President Metsola to increase integrity and accountability, the Bureau adopted clear rules regulating the participation of interest representatives in any event held on Parliament’s premises.

The decision adopted today strengthens existing rules. It requires registration in the transparency register as a pre-condition for all interest representatives to participate in any events organised by Parliament bodies or services taking place on Parliament’s premises, when they take part as invited active guests and/or co-host events (including when co-hosting events with groups and Members). This completes the already existing rules requiring the registration of interest representatives in the transparency register to have access or be invited to speak at public hearings organised by committees. The decision will put some estimated 12 000 extra events per year under the stricter transparency rules.

State of play

Under the reform plan, the Bureau has already adopted a new revolving door policy, which entered into force on 1 May, 2023. It has also revised the rules on former Members on 17 April, 2023, and the rules on the access to the Parliaments on 8 May, 2023.

The Institution has reinforced its cooperation with national judicial and law enforcement authorities, and Group leaders have also clarified the rules regarding human rights urgency debates in plenary with direct implementation.

Group leaders in the Conference of Presidents also approved guidelines to support the Members of the EP and staff in their relations with third countries representatives (diplomats and state representatives). These guidelines clarify practices for access, missions and meetings with some countries that are either EU sanctioned, sanctioning MEPs, named in on-going judicial procedures linked to EP.

In parallel, the implementation of a number of measures that require changes to the Parliaments Rules of Procedure is ongoing. Debates in the committee on Constitutional Affairs (AFCO) continue in order to enable a vote on all the changes in Plenary in July 2023. .

The measure to centralise information related to integrity of parliamentary work for clearer information to the public is under technical implementation by EP services, and expected to be on-line in July, 2023.

To accompany all the actions mentioned above, Parliament runs regular awareness-raising campaigns on obligations for MEPs and staff. Over 200 participants have already participated.

At its next meeting the Bureau will be dealing with the revision of the internal rules on whistleblowing.

Mid-term

This first set of reforms aims at strengthening the Parliament’s integrity, independence and accountability, while protecting the free mandate of Members. Other medium and long-term measures have been proposed by the special Committee responsible established in February plenary (ING2) and will be debated and voted in July 2023. In addition, general modernisation of EP’s ways of working are considered in a wider reform process, launched by the Conference of Presidents in January 2023 on legislative, budgetary, scrutiny, plenary and external dimensions of Parliament’s work.

An overview about the state of play of the reforms is available here.

Source link

Author

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Joint statement by the leaders of France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Romania, the United Kingdom, the President of the European Council and the President of the European Commission after a meeting with President Maia Sandu of Moldova (16 May 2025)

Published

on

© FRVS+MPCP 2022. The European Times® News is registered as an EU Trademark. All rights reserved. The European Times® and the logo of The European Times® are EU trademarks registered by FRVS+MPCP.

Members/Partners of

About Us

Popular Category

DISCLAIMER OPINIONS: The opinions of the authors or reproduced in the articles are the ones of those stating them and it is their own responsibility. Should you find any incorrections you can always contact the newsdesk to seek a correction or right of replay.

DISCLAIMER TRANSLATIONS: All articles in this site are published in English. The translated versions are done through an automated process known as neural translations. If in doubt, always refer to the original article. Thank you for understanding.

DISCLAIMER PHOTOS: We mostly used photos images that are readily available online, from free sources, or from the people promoting the news. If by any chance it happens that we have used one of your copyrighted photos, please do not hesitate to contact us and we will take it down without question. We do not make profits as this is a not for profit project to give voice to the voiceless while giving them a platform to be informed also of general news, and it is completely free.

Editor Picks

Author

Continue Reading

Politics

EU reaffirms right to live free, equal and with dignity

Published

on

© FRVS+MPCP 2022. The European Times® News is registered as an EU Trademark. All rights reserved. The European Times® and the logo of The European Times® are EU trademarks registered by FRVS+MPCP.

Members/Partners of

About Us

Popular Category

DISCLAIMER OPINIONS: The opinions of the authors or reproduced in the articles are the ones of those stating them and it is their own responsibility. Should you find any incorrections you can always contact the newsdesk to seek a correction or right of replay.

DISCLAIMER TRANSLATIONS: All articles in this site are published in English. The translated versions are done through an automated process known as neural translations. If in doubt, always refer to the original article. Thank you for understanding.

DISCLAIMER PHOTOS: We mostly used photos images that are readily available online, from free sources, or from the people promoting the news. If by any chance it happens that we have used one of your copyrighted photos, please do not hesitate to contact us and we will take it down without question. We do not make profits as this is a not for profit project to give voice to the voiceless while giving them a platform to be informed also of general news, and it is completely free.

Editor Picks

Author

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Eurovision 2025: Music, Politics, and the Final 26 Set Amid Controversy and Spectacle

Published

on

Basel, Switzerland — The stage is set for Saturday’s grand finale of the 69th Eurovision Song Contest. After two nights of glitter, drama, and high-octane performances, 26 countries have qualified to compete for Europe’s most coveted pop crown in Basel — a city historically neutral in politics but anything but neutral this year when it comes to the contest’s increasingly fraught cultural context.

The second semi-final on Thursday night saw Austria’s JJ, Malta’s Miriana Conte, and Israel’s Yuval Raphael among those securing their spots in the final. Their acts will now join Tuesday’s qualifiers such as Sweden’s sauna-loving KAJ, Ukraine’s rock band Ziferblat, and the Netherlands’ soulful balladeer Claude. But while the musical spectacle remains dazzling, the political undertones have reached an unprecedented crescendo.

A Night of Glitz and Upsets

Thursday’s semi-final, as it can be read in Euronews, was a whirlwind of vocal bravado and visual excess. Austria’s JJ delivered a baroque-pop tour de force with “Wasted Love” , blending countertenor virtuosity with modern electro beats — a performance that immediately rocketed him to bookmakers’ favorite status. Meanwhile, Malta’s Miriana Conte embraced full-on camp with her tongue-in-cheek anthem “Serving” , performed amidst giant lips and a rotating disco ball — a classic Eurovision moment if ever there was one.

Other qualifiers include Denmark, Armenia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, and Greece — each bringing their own distinct flavor to the mix. Luxembourg also made a triumphant return to the final after years of semi-final heartbreak, with its entrant delivering a genre-blending fusion of folk and synth-pop.

From the first semi-final on Tuesday, standout entries included Sweden’s quirky “Bara Bada Bastu” , which paid homage to the country’s beloved sauna culture, and Ukraine’s hard-rock entry “Bird of Pray” , which many are interpreting as a rallying cry amid ongoing war with Russia.

The Big Five and Host Country Automatic Qualifiers

As per tradition, the “Big Five” nations — France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK — along with host country Switzerland, automatically advanced to the final, regardless of jury or public votes. These five contribute the lion’s share of funding to the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), ensuring their presence in the final no matter what.

Switzerland, hosting for the first time since 1989, has rolled out the red carpet for the continent’s biggest music event. Yet despite the Swiss reputation for neutrality, the country has found itself at the center of a maelstrom over one particular qualifier: Israel.

Israel’s Presence Dominates Political Discourse

For the second consecutive year, Eurovision has been shadowed by controversy over Israel’s participation. Yuval Raphael, who survived the Hamas attack on the Nova Music Festival on October 7, is representing Israel with “New Day Will Rise” . Her story has resonated deeply with some, yet ignited protests from others.

During Raphael’s rehearsal on Thursday, a large Palestinian flag was unfurled in the crowd — prompting swift intervention by security personnel. Organizers from Swiss broadcaster SRG SSR confirmed the individuals were escorted out of the venue.

Outside the arena, hundreds gathered in central Basel on Wednesday evening to protest both Israel’s military actions in Gaza and its presence in the competition. Many protesters pointed to the precedent set in 2022, when Russia was banned from participating following its invasion of Ukraine.

“It should be a happy occasion that Eurovision is finally in Switzerland, but it’s not,” said one demonstrator. “How can we rightfully exclude Russia but still welcome Israel?”

The EBU has maintained a firm stance: Eurovision must remain politically neutral. In response to mounting pressure, including calls from public broadcasters in Spain, Ireland, Iceland, and Belgium, the organization reiterated that participation is based solely on geographic and membership criteria, not political considerations.

More than 70 former Eurovision contestants, including last year’s winner Nemo, signed a letter urging the EBU to reconsider Israel’s inclusion. Nemo told HuffPost UK that “Israel’s actions are fundamentally at odds with the values that Eurovision claims to uphold — peace, unity, and respect for human rights.”

Despite the tension, Raphael struck a conciliatory tone in post-semi-final interviews. “We are here to sing,” she said. “And I’m going to sing my heart out for everyone.”

A City Divided, A Contest Unsettled

In a show of solidarity, a separate demonstration supporting Israel and condemning antisemitism was held in Basel on Thursday. Participants emphasized the importance of free expression and artistic representation, even amid geopolitical conflict.

With the final lineup now complete, all eyes turn to Saturday’s showdown — where jury votes and televotes will determine who takes home the glass microphone trophy.

Austrian sensation JJ, Swedish sauna serenader KAJ, and Ukrainian rockers Ziferblat are early favorites, though surprises are always part of Eurovision’s DNA.

But beyond the sequins and spotlights, Eurovision 2025 may go down in history less for its winning song and more for the questions it raises about the intersection of art, identity, and geopolitics.

As the lights dim and the final notes rise into the Basel night, one thing is clear: Eurovision remains more than just a song contest — it’s a mirror reflecting the joys, tensions, and divisions of contemporary Europe.

Author

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 EuroTimes

Exit mobile version