Connect with us

Health & Society

Experts Warn Against the Dangers of Cannabis & Synthetic Drugs at UNODC CND68 in Vienna

Published

on

experts-warn-against-the-dangers-of-cannabis-&-synthetic-drugs-at-unodc-cnd68-in-vienna

At the 68th session of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND68) in Vienna, a crucial side event titled Supporting Drug Education and Prevention Initiatives brought together experts, policymakers, and former users to discuss the dangers of drug use and the importance of prevention. The event was organized by Fundacion para la Mejora de la Vida la Cultura y la Sociedad (Foundation for the Improvement of Life Culture and Society), an international foundation covering many societal issues with an educational and learning approach, and an important program on drug prevention; it was co-organized with the support of the specialized network of the Foundation for a Drug Free Europe, which counts with over 100 grassroots groups in Europe that do one on one prevention with The Truth About Drugs campaign.

This side event underscored the urgent need for coordinated global action to curb the rising tide of drug abuse, which continues to devastate communities worldwide.

Julie Delvaux, UNODC representative for the ECOSOC recognized Fundacion Mejora, set the tone for the session, emphasizing the need for early intervention: “The earlier we act, the more lives we can save, and the more we can reduce the harm being created by drugs.” She stressed that drug use is not merely a health issue but a social crisis affecting multiple sectors, including crime rates, economic stability, and mental health. With millions of people affected globally, the challenge is immense, and prevention emerges as the most effective long-term solution.

The event featured a range of speakers, from scientists to former drug users, all advocating for strong educational tactics in the field of education to increase the awareness of the dangers of drugs and comprehensive prevention efforts. Their insights painted a stark picture of the drug problem, reinforcing that public health policies should focus on preventing first use, rather than managing addiction after it has already taken hold.

Synthetic Cannabinoids: The Hidden Danger

Robert Galibert, President of the Foundation for a Drug-Free Europe (FDFE) and an expert in biochemistry, gave a scientific breakdown of synthetic cannabinoids, a growing threat in drug markets worldwide. His presentation delved into the biochemical mechanisms through which these substances interact with the human body, explaining how they are far more potent than natural cannabis and pose significant risks to both mental and physical health.

“These substances are far more potent and dangerous than natural cannabis,” Galibert warned. He elaborated on how synthetic cannabinoids, initially developed for medical research, were hijacked by illicit manufacturers seeking to exploit legal loopholes. These unregulated substances have resulted in severe health complications, including heart problems, severe vomiting, hallucinations, and in some cases, fatal overdoses.

He explained how synthetic cannabinoids disrupt the body’s endocannabinoid system, which plays a crucial role in regulating mood, memory, and overall physiological balance. Similarly to phyto-cannabinoids (found in cannabis), these synthetic substitutes bind to cannabinoid receptors, but activate them much more violently, resulting in extreme and unpredictable effects.

He pointed out the fat solubility of cannabis, which allows it to accumulate in the body and cause prolonged impairment. “The elimination of THC takes weeks, meaning a user is under the influence long after consumption,” he said. Comparing it to alcohol, he added, “Alcohol is eliminated in 24 hours, but THC (like phyto- or synthetic-cannabinoids) remains in adipose tissue for weeks, making its effects long-lasting and underestimated.” This insight is particularly crucial in the debate surrounding cannabis legalization, as it challenges the misconception that marijuana use is harmless or easily manageable.

A Former Addict’s Testimony: Real Impact of Drug Use

Perhaps the most moving moment of the event came from Stephanie, a former drug user from Switzerland. Speaking in French, she detailed her descent into addiction, which started with cannabis and quickly escalated to LSD, cocaine, heroin, and methadone. Her candid account exposed the progressive nature of drug addiction, challenging the notion that cannabis use can remain recreational without leading to further substance abuse.

She described how peer pressure led her to experiment: “At first, I didn’t want to be part of the group. But as time passed, I felt isolated. So, I gave in.” Like many young people, she was drawn in by the social aspects of drug use, not realizing the long-term consequences. Her story is a stark reminder that drug addiction often starts with social normalization—what seems like a harmless decision can spiral into a devastating dependency.

Her turning point came when she found herself “in a place without money, without a home, and with a lot of pain”, destitute, and suffering from severe withdrawal symptoms. “I hit rock bottom. That’s when I knew I had to change,” she revealed. After enough attempts at rehabilitation, she finally succeeded in overcoming addiction and now, after recovering control over her life and building a company that gives work to some 30 people, she has made it her mission to help others avoid the same fate.

Her story was a powerful testament to the necessity of prevention and education. She emphasized that had she been properly educated about the dangers of drugs in her early teens, she might have avoided the path she took. She urged policymakers to implement early education programs in schools, providing children with the knowledge and resilience to resist peer pressure.

The Science and Policy Debate on Cannabis

Dr. Francis Nde, medical advisor to the Council of the European Union, focused on the health consequences of cannabis use. He cited studies linking cannabis consumption to testicular cancer, cardiovascular disease, and mental disorders like schizophrenia. “The effects of cannabis are not just short-term; they are passed down through generations,” he emphasized, referring to recent studies on epigenetic effects. He called on governments to take these scientific findings into account when considering cannabis legalization, arguing that public health should take precedence over economic incentives or political pressures.

A tense discussion emerged when a psychologist from Poland, questioned whether alcohol should be considered the primary gateway drug instead of cannabis. Galibert responded with scientific data, reinforcing that while alcohol is a risk factor, cannabis is a stronger predictor of progression to harder drugs due to its persistent impact on the brain. He detailed how THC alters brain chemistry, making individuals more susceptible to seeking stronger substances to achieve similar effects.

Another controversial topic was Ukraine’s potential legalization of medical cannabis. Dr. Olena Shcherbakova, a senior researcher from Ukraine’s National Academy of Medical Sciences, presented the findings of her research with Dr Heorhii Danylenko and warned against legalization efforts: “We understand the risks and are actively working to prevent legalization. But we face strong lobbying efforts.” Her remarks underscored the geopolitical and policy challenges surrounding cannabis regulation. The debate highlighted the global divide in drug policy, where some nations push for legalization while others fight to uphold strict regulations to protect public health.

The Road Ahead for Prevention and Policy

As the session wrapped up, Delvaux reiterated the key message: Prevention through education, early intervention, and international cooperation is crucial in the fight against drug abuse. She called for greater investment in public awareness campaigns, school-based prevention programs, and cross-border collaboration to tackle the evolving drug crisis.

Stephanie’s story, Galibert’s scientific analysis, Dr. Nde’s medical expertise, Dr Shcherbakova and Dr Danylenko, all pointed to the urgent need for stricter policies and widespread awareness campaigns. The speakers warned that legalization efforts, particularly for cannabis, pose a significant risk to public health and should be countered with robust prevention strategies.The event at CND68 made it clear: The fight against drug abuse is far from over. But with education, strong policies, and international collaboration, progress can be made in protecting the most vulnerable—especially the youth—from the devastating consequences of drug addiction.

Author

Health & Society

Scotland’s Skye House: A Revealing Look at the Abuse Within Child Psychiatry

Published

on

In Glasgow, Scotland, a scandal that has captured the nation’s attention is now calling for urgent reforms to the country’s child psychiatric care system. Skye House, a psychiatric facility for children, is at the center of the storm. The 24-bed institution, which was intended to provide care for young people struggling with mental health issues, has instead become a place where physical, emotional, and psychological abuse thrived. These horrifying practices were recently revealed through a shocking BBC documentary, which has now prompted widespread calls for change.

The documentary exposed what was hidden behind the hospital’s walls—forced drugging, restraints, emotional and physical abuse, and a toxic environment created by the staff. Former patients of the facility, some of whom were there for years, shared their traumatic experiences, painting a stark picture of what life was really like inside. One former patient described her time at Skye House as “almost as if I was getting treated like an animal” (Blosser, Freedom Magazine, 2025). This sentiment was echoed by others, who said the culture at the hospital was “quite toxic” and abusive.

A particularly unsettling story came from Abby, who entered the hospital at the age of 14 and spent over two years there. She shared that during her time, she and other patients were heavily sedated to the point where they were left in a zombie-like state. “A lot of the patients were like walking zombies,” Abby recalled in the Freedom Magazine article. “We were just sedated to the point where our personalities were dimmed.” Unfortunately, this kind of mistreatment wasn’t limited to medication. Patients were often subjected to physical restraint, dragged down corridors, or restrained without explanation. One of the young women, Cara, spent over two years at Skye House and was placed in restraints more than 400 times according to John Blosser’s article in Freedom Magazine.

The horrors at Skye House also extended to verbal abuse. Patients who self-harmed were mocked by staff, further deepening their emotional trauma. One girl, reflecting on how she was treated after a self-harm incident, shared that the staff member told her, “You’re disgusting, like that’s disgusting, you need to clean that up” (Blosser, Freedom Magazine, 2025). The constant punishment, ridicule, and physical force left patients feeling isolated, powerless, and dehumanized.

The revelations from the Freedom Magazine article further highlight the system’s alarming failings. Skye House’s treatment of these vulnerable young people didn’t just fall short of expectations—it was, in many cases, outright cruel. According to Scotland’s Mental Health Act, patients could be institutionalized involuntarily and treated without their consent, which allowed for the practice of forced drugging, electroshock therapy, and indefinite detainment. This Act, while intended to protect those with mental health issues, has been criticized for enabling severe mistreatment, as evidenced by the horrors at Skye House (Blosser, Freedom Magazine, 2025).

Perhaps the most heart-wrenching detail mentioned in the article was the tragic suicide of 14-year-old Louise Menzies, who hanged herself in a so-called “suicide-proof” room at Skye House in 2013. Despite the “suicide-proof” design, Louise’s death highlighted the significant failings of the facility’s care and the lack of proper attention to its patients’ needs. Even after this tragedy, the abuse continued, leading to the BBC investigation and subsequent media outcry.

The Scottish government has been forced to address the issues raised by the documentary. Maree Todd, the Minister for Mental Wellbeing, expressed her shock in Parliament, acknowledging that what was revealed in the program was deeply troubling. She promised that actions would be taken to ensure such a situation would not be allowed to continue. Meanwhile, Dr. Scott Davidson, medical director for NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, conceded that the level of care provided at Skye House was “below the level we would expect for our young people”.

This scandal is just one piece of a larger issue facing Scotland’s mental health care system, which has been criticized for failing to protect its most vulnerable citizens. The abuse at Skye House is symptomatic of a broken system that needs comprehensive reform. The government’s promises to implement more inspections of psychiatric facilities are only a small step toward the necessary overhaul of the system. The current framework, particularly the power granted to psychiatrists under the Mental Health Act, has allowed for unchecked abuses to take place, as was the case with Skye House.

As Scotland grapples with the fallout from these revelations, it’s crucial that the government takes immediate and meaningful action to address the abuse and neglect that took place in its psychiatric facilities. The young people subjected to such horrors deserve better than a broken system that punishes rather than cares for them. The time for reform is long overdue, and the survivors of Skye House are now speaking out to ensure that no other children will have to endure the same fate. The victims’ stories must not be forgotten, and their courage in sharing them should serve as a rallying cry for change.

It’s clear that Scotland’s mental health care system needs a complete overhaul, beginning with the protection and proper treatment of vulnerable children. Only by holding these institutions accountable can we hope to prevent further abuses like those that took place at Skye House.

Author

Continue Reading

Health & Society

Scientologists Lead Human Rights Advocacy in Mental Health Through CCHR Exhibition in the Netherlands

Published

on

Netherlands – February 18, 2025 – The Netherlands Committee for Human Rights Foundation (NCRM), in collaboration with the Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR), successfully hosted the traveling exhibition “Psychiatry: An Industry of Death” at the Zuiderkerk in Amsterdam. This powerful event, held from February 15 to 17, shed light on historical and contemporary human rights violations within psychiatry. The exhibition, driven by the dedicated efforts of Scientologists and human rights activists, provided an eye-opening experience to hundreds of visitors.

The three-day exhibition took place in the heart of Amsterdam, a striking contrast to a concurrent European Congress of Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, which was held in a secluded industrial area outside the city. This strategic placement of the exhibit ensured maximum public visibility and accessibility, reflecting the transparency and public engagement that CCHR stands for.

An Eye-Opening Journey Through Psychiatry’s History

Visitors to the exhibit were guided through interactive displays, multimedia presentations, and historical accounts that detailed psychiatry’s troubled past, from early psychiatric institutions and eugenics programs to modern-day concerns like over-medication and involuntary commitment. The powerful visuals and testimonies resonated with the hundreds of visitors who attended, ensuring that critical discussions on psychiatric practices remained in the public domain.

The Zuiderkerk, a historic site that once served as a cemetery, added a symbolic weight to the event. The entrance porch, marked by a skull and crossbones, served as a stark reminder of the suffering endured by victims of psychiatric abuse. Volunteers ensured that CCHR’s message was visible throughout—from a balloon arch in CCHR colors to informational boards and flyers distributed on-site.

Exposing Psychiatric Practices and Their Consequences

The exhibition coincided with the psychiatric congress, whose program included sessions on brain stimulation techniques, including electroshock, electromagnetic induction, and deep brain stimulation via implanted electrodes. NCRM volunteers emphasized that while some neurotechnological treatments may help patients with nerve damage, psychiatry’s historical focus on biochemical imbalances and brain interventions has led to an alarming rise in psychiatric drug prescriptions, now affecting nearly 3 million people in the Netherlands.

A key issue highlighted was the sharp increase in ADHD diagnoses and the use of Ritalin, which quadrupled after a 2005 treatment guideline heavily influenced by psychiatrists with pharmaceutical industry ties. Today, nearly 4% of Dutch youth are medicated for ADHD, despite experts pointing to social and environmental factors—such as school pressure, poverty, and screen exposure—as major contributors to behavioral difficulties.

Stories of Strength and Survival

A particularly moving moment came when a survivor of psychiatric institutionalization, bravely shared her experience. She recounted how she was forcibly taken from her home, denied access to her children, and placed under psychiatric incarceration, where every attempt to assert her rights was met with further drugging and control. She revealed that the only way to escape was to pretend to comply—a sentiment echoed by another visitor who had faced similar struggles.

The official opening of the exhibition featured another powerful testimony from an expert by experience, who described her forced admission and the emotional toll it took on her. Her account deeply moved the audience, many of whom admitted they were previously unaware of the extent of such abuses in psychiatry.

Electroshock Therapy and the Call for Reform

A crucial topic in the exhibition was electroshock therapy (ECT), which is still performed on 1,000 patients annually in the Netherlands. Despite mounting evidence of its permanent memory loss risks and lack of proven efficacy, psychiatric institutions continue its use. A controversial study on ECT in 2020 led to the following conclusion: “Given the high risk of permanent memory loss and the small mortality risk, this longstanding failure to determine whether or not ECT works means that its use should be immediately suspended until a series of well-designed, randomized, placebo-controlled studies have investigated whether there really are any significant benefits against which the proven significant risks can be weighed“. Apparently, “criticism is not or hardly getting through to the psychiatric caste” says Ivan Arjona from Scientology Europe, who has been involved since years at the UN denouncing the heavy violations of human rights. The UN Special Rapporteur on Torture even stated that forced psychiatric interventions could amount to torture when imposed without true informed consent.

NCRM volunteers pressed the Dutch Association for Psychiatry for a response, but the association defended its adherence to existing laws and regulations rather than reconsidering its stance. This highlights the persistent institutional resistance to reform, despite growing global advocacy from the WHO and UN for a shift away from the biomedical model of mental health.

The Role of Media in Amplifying the Message

The exhibition’s impact was further strengthened by media coverage, which played a key role in bringing awareness to the broader public. Reports appeared in “De Andere Krant”, an alternative Dutch newspaper with 12,000 prints, as well as in Amsterdam Daily, ensuring that the issues raised reached a wider audience. Additionally, the open letter addressed to the psychiatry congress organizers had tangible effects. In response to CCHR’s advocacy, the congress removed two key sessions on brain stimulation techniques and pharmacological treatments—a significant victory in the fight against coercive psychiatric interventions.

CCHR volunteer Ogé further emphasized the importance of implementing WHO and UN guidelines that promote ethical mental health practices, highlighting CCHR’s ongoing role in shaping policies that safeguard human rights.

A Continuing Fight for Mental Health Rights

Since its founding in 1969 by members of the Church of Scientology, inspired by the work of L. Ron Hubbard, and psychiatrist Dr. Thomas Szasz, CCHR has remained a leading voice in exposing psychiatric abuses and advocating for reforms. Through public exhibitions, legal actions, and lobbying efforts, CCHR continues to challenge the pharmaceutical industry’s influence, prevent coercive treatments, and defend the rights of individuals affected by psychiatry.

The success of the Amsterdam exhibit is a testament to the unwavering dedication of Scientologists and CCHR activists in bringing truth and accountability to the field of mental health. As the battle for human rights in psychiatry continues, CCHR’s work stands as a beacon of hope and justice for individuals and families affected by psychiatric abuses.

Author

Continue Reading

Health & Society

Brussels’ Drugs Crisis: Between Law Enforcement and Long-Term Solutions

Published

on

The Growing Drug Problem in Brussels

Brussels is facing a deepening crisis related to drug trafficking, consumption, and associated violence. With €1.2 billion spent on illegal drugs in Belgium in 2023 (according to the National Bank of Belgium, consumption levels are nearly double previous estimates. Wastewater analyses have placed Brussels among the highest-ranking cities in Europe for cocaine use as reported by the Brussels Times, with an increasing epidemic of crack cocaine affecting marginalized populations.

The situation has become more dangerous and visible, with incidents such as shootings in metro stations involving assault rifles, reinforcing public fears and concerns about law enforcement’s ability to handle the crisis. Despite federal efforts to strengthen police forces and unify Brussels’ fragmented security zones, the regional response has been perceived as inadequate and reactive, leaving both citizens and policymakers frustrated.

Law Enforcement’s Struggles and the Need for Reform

The Regional Security Council (RSC) recently met to discuss the escalation of drug-related violence, but the outcome left much to be desired. Rather than announcing decisive new strategies, the Brussels leadership merely extended the hotspot strategy, a plan implemented after a similar wave of shootings in 2024. This plan involves increased police presence, targeted legal actions, identity checks, and neighborhood improvement projects.

However, this approach has shown limited success. Anderlecht’s mayor, Fabrice Cumps, admitted that police harassment of drug dealers serves little more than a symbolic purpose. Meanwhile, Brussels’ Minister-President Rudi Vervoort’s comment that residents will “just have to live with it” reflects an alarming lack of urgency.

While law enforcement remains crucial in tackling organized crime, it is not enough on its own. The lack of coordination among the six separate police zones, along with political disagreements between francophone and Flemish nationalist parties, has further hindered effective policing and security policy in Brussels.

The Case for an Integrated Approach: Suppressing Supply While Reducing Demand

To address this crisis effectively, a dual approach is needed:

  1. Enhanced Law Enforcement Measures to target the supply side of drug trafficking.
  2. Long-Term Public Health and Prevention Strategies to reduce demand for drugs.

1. Strengthening Law Enforcement

The Belgian federal government has already proposed key reforms to law enforcement, including:

  • Merging the six Brussels police zones into one to ensure a more unified and effective security policy.
  • Implementing a zero-tolerance policy for drugs in and around metro stations and public areas.
  • Expanding the “Very Irritating Police” (VIP) approach to disrupt drug markets by making targeted areas less attractive to dealers.
  • Strengthening the Federal Canal Plan to combat organized crime hubs.

These measures are necessary but need to be executed effectively, with improved coordination between regional and federal authorities. Additionally, police officers should receive specialized training to deal with drug-related crimes and addiction-related offenses in a way that combines security with education. There are many examples worldwide where police officers have been giving drug prevention information lectures, which helps give the youth the information from authoritative sources they trust..

2. Investing in Prevention: Reducing Demand for Drugs

While robust law enforcement may disrupt drug networks in the short term (and it should be done), it does not address why people use drugs in the first place. The current focus on crack cocaine and middle-class cocaine use as well as the “normalized” use of marijuana, cannabis, and the likes, suggests deep societal issues—ranging from economic hardship to social isolation and life struggles coming from lack of tools and strategies to deal with day to day problems.

To reduce drug demand, the government could use the following strategies:

  • Strengthen School and Community-Based Prevention Programs: Targeted education in schools, community centers, and workplaces can delay or prevent drug experimentation among youth.
  • Erradicate Harm Reduction Strategies: Supervised consumption rooms, while intended to reduce harm, often lead to unintended consequences. These facilities can normalize drug use, attract criminal activity, and become hotspots for dealers preying on vulnerable individuals. Rather than offering a pathway to rehabilitation, they risk perpetuating addiction by providing a space for continued substance use without addressing the underlying causes. Redirecting resources towards comprehensive rehabilitation programs and education initiatives would provide a more sustainable solution to breaking the cycle of addiction.
  • Expand Public Awareness Campaigns: Programs like “The Truth About Drugs” led in Belgium by Julie Delvaux, and other educational initiatives should receive increased support. These campaigns inform young people and at-risk populations about the dangers of drug use, using real-life testimonies and factual information.

Overcoming Political and Structural Barriers

A major obstacle to implementing these solutions is the political deadlock in Brussels. Disagreements between francophone and Flemish nationalist parties have left Brussels without a regional government, preventing crucial reforms from being enacted. Additionally, funding constraints and bureaucratic inefficiencies slow down progress.

To break through these barriers, the following steps should be prioritized:

  • Fast-tracking police zone unification to eliminate coordination issues.
  • Establishing a Brussels-wide Drug Policy Task Force that includes experts from law enforcement, education, health, and social services to ensure a comprehensive response.
  • Lobbying for increased EU support for drug education campaigns and law enforcement cooperation, especially given Belgium’s role as a hub for drug trafficking into Europe.

A Call to Action: Beyond Short-Term Measures

The current situation in Brussels is unsustainable. While police crackdowns may bring temporary relief, they do not solve the deeper societal problems driving drug abuse and violence. A comprehensive supply-and-demand approach—combining strong law enforcement with effective prevention, education, and drug rehab efforts (not substitution drugs)—is essential for long-term success.

The time for half-measures is over. Brussels must act decisively to ensure that future generations do not grow up in a city where drug-related violence is just “something they have to live with.”

Author

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 EuroTimes

Exit mobile version