Connect with us

Travel

Toronto plane crash is 2025’s latest: Is flying still the safest form of transport?

Published

on

As the Delta crash in Toronto adds to a recent spate of accidents, we look at the safety of flying and find cause for hope.

A Delta Airlines flight carrying 80 people crash landed in Toronto yesterday (17 February), becoming the latest in a string of aviation incidents in 2025.

Luckily no one was killed in Monday’s crash, which happened when the Delta jet crashed and apparently flipped while landing at Toronto Pearson International Airport. The plane, which had departed from the Minneapolis in Minnesota, was carrying 76 passengers and four crewmembers, the Federal Aviation Administration said. Of them, 18 people were taken to the hospital with injuries. Experts say strong winds and snow may have caused the plane to flip over.

The Toronto crash follows one of the worst US plane crashes in recent history which happened on 29 January this year.

An American Airlines plane carrying 64 passengers and crew collided mid-air with a military helicopter as it approached Ronald Reagan National Airport near Washington, just five kilometres south of the White House and the US Capitol.

Plummeting into the Potomac River, all 67 people onboard the two aircraft sadly died.

It is natural that these recent incidents leave some travellers wary of flying. But plane crashes are still thankfully very rare and, according to experts, flying is still the safest form of transport.

Fatal crashes of American commercial airlines are rare

Prior to the American Airlines DC crash, the last fatal crash of a passenger plane in the United States was in 2008, when 49 passengers are crew were killed near Buffalo, New York, when a Bombardier DHC-8 propeller plane crashed into a house.

The deadliest plane crash in US history continues to be on September 11, 2001, when four jetliners were hijacked by al-Qaida, sending two planes into the World Trade Center in New York, one into the Pentagon in Virginia, and a fourth into a field in western Pennsylvania. Nearly 3,000 people were killed and this incident remains the deadliest terror attack in history.

2024 plane crashes: A string of incidents but still rare

At the end of 2024, more than 200 people lost their lives in two separate incidents just days apart.

38 people died in December when an Azerbaijan Airlines plane crashed in Kazakhstan; four days later, 179 perished when a Jeju Air flight crash landed in South Korea.

While recent events are still ringing in the minds of many, there were other disasters in aviation in 2024. In early January, a fiery crash in Tokyo shocked the world, leaving five members of the Japan Coast Guard dead, although passengers on the Japan Airlines plane escaped safely.

Days later, part of a plane fell off when it was departing from Portland, Oregon, leaving a gaping hole in the side of the fuselage. Again, all 177 passengers survived the emergency landing, but the fallout from the event has seen major manufacturer Boeing in the spotlight all year.

During the summer the tragic loss of a Voepass flight in Brazil claimed the lives of 62 passengers and crew.

On top of this, multiple reports of aircraft hitting severe turbulence and injuring people, including one fatality on a Singapore Airlines flight, have given travellers cause to worry about their safety.

According to the Aviation Safety Network, a total of 318 people died in aircraft accidents last year, making 2024 the deadliest year in aviation since 2018.

But is flying really becoming less safe, and should we be worried if we’ve got an upcoming trip booked?

Flying is getting safer all the time

Dr Hassan Shahidi, president and CEO of Flight Safety Foundation, a non-profit involved in all aspects of aviation safety, put things in perspective for Euronews Travel.

“In all of 2023, there were zero commercial jet fatalities,” he says. “By the time 2024 was over, the aviation industry had transported 5 billion passengers worldwide. And until just the past few days, 2024 was poised to repeat that safety record.”

According to research from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), flying is safer today than ever.

In the 2018-2022 period, the risk of dying through air travel was calculated to be 1 per every 13.7 million passenger boardings. That’s down from 1 per 7.9 million boardings in 2008-2017 and a major decrease from the 1 per every 350,000 boardings in 1968 to 1977.

Research from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Academy has shown that up to 80 per cent of aviation accidents can be attributed to human error. A mistake on the pilots’ part is thought to account for 53 per cent of accidents, while mechanical failure was considered to be at fault in just 21 per cent of cases.

Airbus studied which part of the flight was most dangerous, and found that takeoff and landing were when accidents were most likely to occur. Both of the two December 2024 crashes happened when landing, although other factors were in play.

In the Jeju Air crash, for example, there were reports of an engine being damaged after hitting a bird, and the aircraft, for an as yet unknown reason, did not have its landing gear deployed when it touched down. The investigation will be long and complex, and it’s likely to be some time before we understand exactly what happened.

“This accident involved a multitude of factors, from bird strikes to landing without landing gear and flaps,” Shahidi adds. “All of this will be thoroughly investigated, contributing factors will be determined and steps will be taken to ensure this doesn’t happen again.”

Jeju Air has been inspecting its fleet of 737 ‘next generation’ (NG) aircraft, but out of an abundance of caution. Nothing so far suggests that there is a more widespread problem with the aircraft type.

Every air accident makes air travel safer

The small silver lining in the string of recent incidents is that every accident serves to make air travel safer in the future.

As Simon Calder, travel correspondent for the UK’s Independent newspaper wrote in a recent column, “All the dramatic aviation events of 2024 – fatal and otherwise – will be analysed minutely to understand what can be learnt to enhance future safety.”

In the case of both the Jeju Air and Azerbaijan Airlines crashes, the infamous ‘black boxes’ have been recovered and sent for interrogation.

These two boxes, which are actually bright orange in colour, are the Flight Data Recorder (FDR) and Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) and should shed some light on what happened prior to the crash.

Accident investigators are on the ground in Kazakhstan and South Korea gathering more evidence, a process that could take some time. Following this, collected data will be analysed in a lab to determine the cause of the crash.

Reports from the investigations will be used to make recommendations to avoid a similar situation in the future.

“One of the strengths of aviation safety processes is that whenever any tragedy does occur, we analyse what happened and take appropriate action to ensure, to the extent possible, that the same type of accident will not occur again,” explains Northcote.

Consider any major aviation accident, and it’s possible to see the longer-term positive effect it has had on air safety.

A collision over the Grand Canyon in June 1956, for example, between a TWA Super Constellation and a United Airlines DC-7 led to upgraded forms of air traffic control.

After TWA Flight 800 exploded in mid-air in 1996, modifications were made to ensure fuel could not be combusted by an errant spark.

Without the tragedy of 9/11, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) would never have been created. And thanks to the (still) missing Malaysia Airlines MH370, all aircraft are now tracked in real-time.

“This constant cycle of improvement is fundamental to keeping the aviation safety record strong,” says Northcote.

“We work with other regulators, for example the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in the United States and with the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), to ensure that aviation safety standards are high globally, not only in Europe.”

While manufacturers, airlines and regulators work hard to maintain safety in the skies, Northcote highlights that safe travel is a team effort.

“Aviation has in general an excellent safety record, but this is no cause for complacency,” she says. “This strong safety record can only be maintained by many individual people fulfilling their role every day to ensure that operations are safe.”

Author

  • Daniela Daecher

    Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Travel

Why Trump’s tariff threats are bringing more American travellers to Europe this year

Published

on

A stronger dollar and Canadians boycotting the US are leading many to change their travel plans.

Trump’s tariff threats and economic uncertainty are causing Canadians to ditch the US and travel to Europe instead. Americans are planning to join them on the old continent, thanks to the US dollar stretching further in travel money. While Americans living in Europe say they’re definitely staying put, seeking to avoid their “toxic and expensive” homeland.

As the new US President’s many policy changes are revealed, Euronews Travel looks at what impact they might have on travel.

Will the US dollar be strong in 2025?

If economists are right, the US dollar will strengthen further against foreign currencies. Even the threat of a new tariff policy means that major world currencies – like the euro – get weakened by moving interest rates.

This then grants Americans who wish to travel outside the states better buying power, potentially enjoying longer or more luxurious trips if they book guided tours, accommodations and restaurants in the local currency.

US expats in Europe plan to stay away from ‘toxic’ America

Craig Sauers, an American based in Tbilisi, Georgia, was already living abroad when Trump won in 2016, which he says came as “a shock.”

As an American abroad, he feels “ashamed, embarrassed and angry” and was “appalled that so many Americans bought into his messaging” eight years later.

“I certainly don’t plan to move back to the US anytime soon. MAGA regime change is one thing, but inflationary pressures also haven’t eased at all. The US is both toxic and expensive right now, and that’s a bad mix,” says Sauers.

“I do hope to visit, though. I’m not getting any younger, and I can’t let my pride get in the way of relationships with my parents, siblings, and nieces and nephews.”

Jared Batzel currently lives in Madrid and is studying for his MBA. He previously served in the US military and other public-sector roles, including USAID which has been all but closed down under Trump.

“I’ve always periodically boomeranged back to the United States for one reason or another… but the returns have been increasingly jarring,” he says.

Batzel is keeping his existing plans to visit the US in May, “mostly for personal or professional requirements”, but says there’s nothing he misses in America, despite being born and raised in a very pro-Trump region of America.

While he understands some complaints and frustrations that Trump voters have, he says he “doesn’t recognise much of America anymore.”

“I have many English-speaking colleagues in Spain who are from a few dozen countries. Many have worked in the United States before or were looking to in the future. Virtually all of them have reconsidered and are seeking more long-term opportunities in Europe or in their home countries,” adds Batzel.

“This goes beyond the politics of the day and includes things like inflation and cost of living, crime and mass shootings, and many other reasons that have made the American brand toxic on the world stage.”

Why are Canadians cancelling travel to the US?

After the Trump administration threatened Canada with hefty tariffs in its first few days in office, prime minister Justin Trudeau told citizens to “choose Canada”.

“It might mean changing your summer vacation plans to stay here in Canada and explore the many national and provincial parks, historical sites and tourist destinations our great country has to offer,” Trudeau said.

Canada listened, too, according to the latest data.

“Already, Flight Centre experts have helped several Canadians pivot away from their US vacations and rebook elsewhere,” Flight Centre Travel Group in Canada told Open Jaw, a daily news site for Canadian travel agents.

“One of our long-time customers cancelled a trip to Arizona over the weekend and now plans to bring her family to Portugal instead,” the travel company confirmed.

Some of these trips are “bucket-list and milestone experiences,” costing between €6,700 and €13,480. Planned cruises are also being cancelled because many stop off at US ports.

It’s not just leisure travellers who are cancelling: A recent Corporate Traveller/YouGov survey reveals that 40 per cent of Canadian small and medium-sized businesses have already cut anticipated US-bound business travel. US customs lines in major Canadian airports are reportedly already much quieter.

According to the US Travel Association (USTA), Canadians are the top source of international visitors to the United States. They enjoy the warmer climes of Florida, California, Nevada, New York, and Texas. In 2024, 20.4 million Canadians visited the US, spending $20.5 billion (€19.60 bn).

Tariffs – when goods imported from other countries are charged a tax, typically a percentage of a product’s value – are a significant part of Trump’s economic plans.

In the first few days of office, the new US administration introduced a 10 per cent tax on all products from China and has also proposed introducing tariffs on products from Canada and Mexico.

Whether the tariffs come or not, Canadians are saying they will continue to cancel. Air Canada will cut several routes to Florida, Las Vegas, and Arizona starting in March, citing the tariff dispute and the weakened Canadian dollar, reports Travel and Tour World.

Hawaii fear fewer holidaygoers in 2025

Although Hawaii is a popular holiday destination with a distinct cultural identity from mainland America, the archipelago relies on the US dollar and so is also seeing fewer visitors due to tariff threats imposed on foreign imports.

Demand for WestJet, a local airline that flies from the US to all the major Hawaiian islands, has dropped by 25 per cent in recent weeks, according to local media, Khon2.

Locals who rely on tourism on the island are now pleading with international visitors not to cancel their trips. Whether the islanders’ requests to support Hawaii’s vital tourism industry are heard, time is yet to tell.

Author

  • Daniela Daecher

    Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Travel

Czechia, Spain, France: Where are railway networks growing the fastest in Europe?

Published

on

Railway lines are the backbone of Europe’s clean transport transition, but they’re not improving quick enough.

The EU’s high-speed railway network has nearly doubled in a decade, according to the latest official figures.

Lines capable of carrying trains at 250 km/h and more criss-crossed 8,556 km across the continent in 2023, according to Eurostat. That’s up from 5,812 in 2013.

However, the bloc’s total railway network shrunk by 1.3 per cent in that time, stretching only 200,947 km in 2023. “Europe is not upgrading its railways fast enough,” warns Carlos Rico, rail policy officer at campaign group Transport & Environment (T&E).

Despite railway lines being the backbone of Europe’s clean transport transition, the latest figures reveal a map of uneven progress.

Which European country has the highest density of railway lines?

Czechia has the highest density railway network in Europe, with 123.2 metres of railway lines per square kilometre.

Almost all its lines were built under the reign of the monarchy from the nineteenth century onwards, national railway manager Správa železnicand states, and taken over by the communist regime which prioritised rail transport over roads.

It is followed by Belgium (119.2 m/km²), Germany (109.5 m/km²) and Luxembourg (104.8 m/km²).

As Eurostat analysts note, the countries with the highest density of railway networks are all located in the centre of northern Europe, reflecting both their high population density and relatively high volumes of freight transport.

At the other end of the spectrum, the lowest railway network densities were found in Greece (14.0 m/km²), and Finland (19.4 m/km²) – which has the lowest population density in the EU.

Sweden (26.8 m/km²), Estonia (27.2 m/km²), Portugal (27.8 m/km²), Latvia (28.9 m/km²) and Ireland (29.8 m/km²) round out the bottom of the list.

How important is railway network density?

High railway density usually translates into a higher accessibility to railways, explains Rico. However, simply having a station close by doesn’t guarantee an easy ride.

“For a railway system to triumph it needs to be affordable and reliable,” he emphasises. “If the network is very large but frequencies are poor, prices are too high and delays are constant, it will not be able to capture a significant demand.

“And without those passengers, the system will be harder to maintain financially.”

Czechia scores well on the affordability front, with low ticket prices and special fares. But punctuality let it down in T&E’s rail operator rankings at the end of last year.

Within the EU, high-speed railway lines often span national borders, facilitating seamless travel around the bloc. This network has seen significant growth, Eurostat reports, rising by 47 per cent in the decade to 2023.

Spain is leading the way with 3,190 km of high-speed lines, a 66 per cent increase from 2013.

This reflects its status as by far the biggest benefactor of EU funds for high-speed rail between 2000 and 2017, receiving almost half of the funding on offer for the whole bloc.

However, T&E’s Rico explains, it’s also the result of very low construction costs compared to other countries.

Lower land and labour costs keep prices down in Spain, but economies of scale have played a significant role too. The lowest costs per kilometre were achieved when the country had the largest amount of projects in development at the same time.

France is fairly close behind with 2,748 km of high-speed lines, a 35 per cent increase from 2013. It is followed by Germany with 1,163 km and Italy with 1,097 km.

How can we get the EU’s rail targets on track?

Put simply, Europe’s railway network still has a long way to go to support the continent’s energy and climate goals.

The European Court of Auditors warned in 2020 that the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) network, Europe’s key policy for cross-border rail, is unlikely to meet its goals on time.

T&E is urging countries to funnel sufficient national funds into these projects. The European Commission, it argues, should fund top priority investments that boost transnational connections.

Rail represents only 0.4 per cent of transport emissions in the EU while transporting 7 per cent of the passengers.

“High speed lines are a part of the solution, but they are not the silver bullet,” says Rico. “Rail will contribute to transport decarbonisation in coordination with road electrification and clean fuels for aviation and shipping.”

To realise the “climate potential of rail”, he adds, we need increased competition, simplified cross-border ticketing, and a common signalling system in Europe (the ETCS). This latter piece of the puzzle will enable better connectivity and services without the need for new infrastructure.

Author

  • Daniela Daecher

    Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Travel

Popular Portuguese resort town tells tourists to put their clothes on or face a fine

Published

on

Albufeira is the latest European city to propose new laws to stop tourists walking around without their clothes on.

Visitors to Albufeira may soon need to cover up when they walk around the popular coastal city under a new tourist code of conduct proposed by the city council.

Newly proposed rules mean fines of more than €1,500 could be issued if tourists are found wandering around the resort town in their swimwear.

Albufeira is the latest of several popular tourist destinations in Europe to adopt a so-called ‘bikini ban’.

The proposed rules target “excessive” tourist behaviour

The mayor of Albufeira, José Carlos Martins Rolo, has opened a public consultation over new rules around tourist behaviour in public areas.

Located on the southern Algarve coast, it’s common to find tourists who’ve spent a day at the beach wandering the city ‘partially naked’ in swimwear or even ‘completely naked’, which has been a problem for the city’s family-friendly image.

Visitors will still be free to wear swimwear such as bikinis or swimming trunks on beaches and in popular bathing spots, as well as in external hotel areas such as pool areas.

However, anyone who is ‘scantily clad’ outside of these exceptions could receive a hefty fine of up to €1,500. And if tourists are caught completely naked, the fine issued could extend up to €1,800.

Albufeira is a popular holiday hotspot for families with its beautiful beaches, fun waterparks, and golf courses. It has also, however, adopted a holiday drinking culture with a buzzing nightlife.

At the heart of the town lies The Strip, a so-called party street filled with themed bars and nightclubs. It attracts many hen and stag parties from elsewhere in Europe.

The proposed document says that “urgent” change is needed to tackle tourist misbehaviour, particularly in the wake of an incident last year when eight British male tourists were identified dancing naked – during the day – on top of a bar at Rua da Oura.

The proposed rules will also address other issues to deal with “abusive behaviour”, such as banning alcohol consumption in the street, public urination, defecation and spitting, as well as public sex acts, including from within businesses and terraces (such as open beach bars) that can be seen from public areas.

It’s hoped that the fines will act as a “preventative measure”.

Are the new rules targeted at British tourists?

The Algarve received 5.2 million visitors last year – a record-breaking number, according to the Algarve Tourism Board (RTA).

Of these, 4.4 million tourists came from Britain, followed by 1.13 million German and  967,000 Irish tourists. The nightlight and beaches of Albufeira are particularly popular with Brits.

Local mayor Rolo first proposed a new tourism strategy in April 2024 when he said that while the sun and beaches of Albufeira would continue to be a draw for visitors, the town needed to be promoted outside of its popular summer season.

Rolo added that he wanted to revert or demystify “the widespread image of Albufeira as a mass tourism destination”, “reduce the dependence on the British market” and encourage the town to become an “internationally-leading sustainable tourist destination”.

The public has 30 days to share their opinions on Albufeira’s proposed code of conduct. The expectation is that these rules will be in place ahead of the peak summer season.

So-called bikini bans are rising among Europe’s holiday hotspots

Albufeira is not the only tourist destination to propose introducing dress code laws.

Some parts of Spain, such as Barcelona and Majorca already have rules stating that you cannot go topless or wear swimwear in local shops and restaurants. If you do, you face a fine of up to €300.

In Malaga, the city hall has put up signs in English reminding visitors that local rules around littering, states of undress, rowdiness and reckless driving of e-scooters also apply to them.

In the coastal towns of Split,  Dubrovnik and Hvar in Croatia, ‘disturbances to public order’ laws have been passed against anyone walking around bare-chested or in swimwear. Again, if you do, you face a fine of up to €150 – and up to €4,000 if you’re visibly drunk in public.

In Nice, France, anyone – tourists and locals alike – going topless around town can be fined €35 on the spot, or face a €38 fine if bathing topless where it’s prohibited. However, you’re more likely to be reprimanded, as only “around 5 per cent of police stops” result in a fine, deputy mayor Anthony Borré told local news outlets last year.

Italy was one of the first destinations to tackle tourist clothing when, in 2022, the mayor of Sorrento on the southwestern Amalfi Coast introduced a €500 fine for anyone found wandering around in a two-piece swimsuit.

Author

  • Daniela Daecher

    Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 EuroTimes