In a decisive move to enhance transparency and accountability within the European Union, the European Parliament has elected Teresa Anjinho as the new European Ombudsman for the 2025-2029 term. Anjinho, a distinguished Portuguese lawyer and former Deputy Ombudsman of Portugal, succeeds Emily O’Reilly, who has held the position since 2013.

A Competitive Selection Process

The election, held during the December plenary session in Strasbourg, followed a rigorous selection process. The Committee on Petitions (PETI) conducted public hearings on December 3, 2024, where six candidates presented their visions for the Ombudsman‘s role. The candidates included:

• Teresa Anjinho (Portugal): Former Deputy Portuguese Ombudsman.
• Emilio De Capitani (Italy): Former European Parliament official.
• Marino Fardelli (Italy): Ombudsman of the Lazio region.
• Julia Laffranque (Estonia): Former judge of the European Court of Human Rights.
• Claudia Mahler (Austria): Human rights expert.
• Reinier van Zutphen (Netherlands): Ombudsman of the Netherlands.

Each candidate outlined their priorities, ranging from enhancing communication and human rights awareness to strengthening trust between EU institutions and citizens. Anjinho emphasized effective communication, human rights awareness, and empowering individual complaints, which resonated with the Members of the European Parliament (MEPs).

The Role of the European Ombudsman

Established by the Maastricht Treaty in 1995, the European Ombudsman investigates complaints of maladministration within EU institutions, bodies, offices, and agencies. The Ombudsman plays a crucial role in ensuring that EU institutions adhere to principles of good administration, thereby upholding citizens’ rights under the EU Treaties and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. The position is pivotal in maintaining transparency, accountability, and trust between EU institutions and the public.

Anjinho’s Vision for the Future

Anjinho’s appointment comes at a time when the EU is striving to strengthen its democratic processes and enhance citizen engagement. Her commitment to launching strategic own-initiative inquiries and fostering partnerships with national ombudsmen’s offices, academic institutions, and civil society representatives is expected to bring a fresh perspective to the Ombudsman’s office. Anjinho aims to build upon the work of her predecessors, focusing on proactive measures to address systemic issues and improve the quality of EU administration.

Looking Ahead

As Anjinho prepares to assume her duties on January 1, 2025, European civil society and politicians anticipate a continuation of the Ombudsman’s essential work in promoting transparency and accountability within the EU. Her tenure is expected to further bridge the gap between EU institutions and citizens, ensuring that the principles of good administration are upheld across all EU bodies.

For more information on the European Ombudsman and the recent election, visit the official European Parliament Think Tank document. European Parliament

Police violence // According to the Public Defender of Georgia (Ombudsperson’s Office) that I visited while in Tbilisi, 225 out of 327 detainees interviewed by their representatives claimed to have been victims of ill-treatment and 157 of them had visible physical injuries.

Some statistics about police violence

Along with the beatings, the special forces robbed the detainees, took away their clothes, shoes, mobile phones, bags, wallets, glasses, crosses and other personal belongings – they forced them to say derogatory phrases about themselves or to praise head of the Special Tasks Department, Zviad Kharazishvili (“Khareba”). In some cases, Kharazishvili personally recorded videos of the beaten detainees, the heads of several civil society organizations said in a joint statement.

To crack down on tens of thousands of peaceful demonstrators, the Ministry of Internal Affairs used special equipment, including unknown substances diluted in water jets, pepper spray, tear gas of an unknown substance, and others.

In some cases, before the crackdown began, a special water jet vehicle approached the demonstrators, and a special warning/call to disperse was heard. In some cases, the crackdown on demonstrations began with direct pursuit and arrests of demonstrators, and a warning signal and other means of crackdown were used later.

After using the water jets, the special forces fired a large number of tear gas capsules at tens of thousands of peaceful demonstrators, which made breathing and vision impossible, caused panic, and created a real threat of stampede and chaos.

In a number of cases, peaceful demonstrators who obeyed the call to disperse were ambushed, surrounded, and detained by special forces.

Special forces physically abused detainees, and after they were brought into the special forces cordon, law enforcement officers continued to physically abuse them.

Georgian President Salome Zurabishvili at the European Parliament

On 18 December, Georgian President Salome Zurabishvili delivered a speech to the European Parliament in which she called for active steps to be taken by the EU. About the recent rigged parliamentary election, she compared the current events in Georgia to the Soviet occupation of 1921 and was quoted as saying:

Zurabishvili also stressed in her address to the Parliament that Georgians are not going to accept the Russification of their country and will not stop until they receive new free and fair elections, but for this, they need Western help.

Speaking about the 21 days of protests in Georgia, she said that the protest movement has now encompassed the entire society. She also noted that the protests began earlier, after the adoption of Russian-type laws, and said

“The only time when people in Georgia take to the streets is when they feel that an existential issue is at stake. This is a very peaceful, civil disobedience movement that demands two things: give us back the votes taken away due to the stolen elections and give us back our European future. This is not a revolutionary movement, this is a demand for new elections.”

She also stressed that the attempted construction of a Russian-type state in Georgia is something that is happening gradually and that a large part of the Georgian democratic institutions is already under control of a single-party or one-man rule.  Only the opposition media and human rights NGOs are still out of their hand, but for how long.

“Georgians are still waiting for tough measures from Brussels and Washington. And I hope we will not have to wait for a deeper crisis for Europe to act. What can Europe do? First of all, political support. We need constant political attention from the highest levels, because Georgians need to know that they are not alone and that we have your back,” she said.

While the European Parliament called for new elections in Georgia, the EU Member States could only propose a suspension of visa-free travel for Georgian holders of diplomatic and service passports. Tougher sanctions could not be adopted because of the veto of Hungary and Slovakia.

Being asked by some people at the European Parliament who declared to be ready to help her in case she would go into exile, she answered, like President Zelensky in Ukraine in 2022, that she would stay in Georgia to fight alongside the Georgian population and the main support she needed was from the EU. Up to now, Europe has been “slow to wake up and slow to react,” she said, while the Georgians need the EU to act quickly and to avoid a ‘business as usual’ policy.

Over 800 businesses, among them MagtiCom, PSP Pharma, Daily, McDonald’s, SPAR, Veli Store, Magniti, Toyota Center Tbilisi, Alta, PwC Georgia, and Gvirila, this week signed a statement calling for quick actions and new elections, saying “they take responsibility for the fate of the country and its irreversible progress.”

The Romanian Orthodox Church has distanced itself from the position and actions of Archbishop Teodosii of Tomi (Constanța), who openly campaigned in his diocese for Calin Georgescu as “God’s messenger.” The Archbishop does not hide that he is an admirer of Vladimir Putin, D. Medvedev and Donald Trump, “who speak of peace” and “Christian values.” The high cleric has attracted the attention of the Romanian and Western media with his undisguised campaigning in his diocese for Georgescu.

The position of the Romanian Patriarchate states: “The Romanian Patriarchate categorically distances itself from the statements of His Eminence Father Teodosii, Archbishop of Tomi, in an interview given to the publication “Le Figaro” regarding Mr. Calin Georgescu and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The next working session of the Holy Synod will consider the case of His Eminence Theodosius for the repeated violation of the decisions of the Holy Synod regarding the election campaigns.”

In an interview with the French publication published on December 6, Archbishop Theodosius said of the former candidate for president of Romania, Calin Georgescu, that “he is more of a man of God than a politician. He is the one sent by God.” “He is a believer. The grandson and great-grandson of a priest who defends Christian values ​​and is interested in the everyday life of Romanians.” And he described Vladimir Putin as “a man of peace and a builder of churches,” “whom we should not be afraid of.” When asked by French journalists how this opinion of his corresponded to the war against Ukraine launched on the orders of the Russian dictator, the senior cleric evaded the answer, blaming the war on “the bad guys.” According to him, Georgescu, who sympathizes with Putin, “will resolve these contradictions.”

In his defense, the archbishop said that he had not violated anything, the interview should have been published after the elections, not before them. The definition of “messenger of God” was of a general nature, not political, it was made because of the personal qualities of the candidate. And about Putin, he “spoke in principle that he was a founder of churches, not specifically”. In 2006, Archbishop Theodosius admitted that he had been recruited by the “Securitate” in 1987, when he was an assistant at the Institute of Theology in Bucharest. “I think I was vulnerable because I had applied for a scholarship to study abroad,” the archbishop said, noting that he had only reported on issues “of great national interest”.