Connect with us

Health & Society

Doctors are not trained in how to discontinue psychiatric drugs

Published

on

doctors-are-not-trained-in-how-to-discontinue-psychiatric-drugs

Tens of thousands of Europeans are every month seeking advice on how to discontinue or get off antidepressants outside their regular health services. That’s because doctors are not trained in how to deprescribe antidepressants and other psychiatric drugs research has found. The research suggest that tapering (slowly stopping) has to be done gradually, and at a rate that the individual user can tolerate, and reductions should be made by smaller and smaller amounts. It can take months and even years to get fully off the drugs.

Can not get off common antidepressants

At large international psychiatric congresses it for years has been common to present new studies on psychiatric drugs and discuss why and when to prescribe medications. At this year’s European Psychiatric Congress that was recently held in Budapest, Hungary a so-called State of the Art lecture set a new trend looking at how to properly discontinue or deprescribe psychotropic drugs.

An expert, Dr. Mark Horowitz a Clinical Research Fellow in Psychiatry at the National Health Service (NHS) in England had been given the task to address the necessary skills and guidelines to supported reduction or discontinuation of psychopharmacological treatment.

The backdrop to this is a scene in which many people cannot come off common antidepressants in the way the official medical guidelines recommend. Studies in Holland found that only some 7% of people could stop in this way and in England they found that 40% of people could stop in this way however with quite pronounced withdrawal effects.

Part of the problem is that doctors often believe that the withdrawal effects are “brief and mild”. And they do not know that withdrawal symptoms may include anxiety, depressed mood, and insomnia. The result is that they often tell their patients using antidepressants that there shouldn’t be a problem with coming off the antidepressant drug, and when the patients do report withdrawal effects they believe these to be the original underlying condition. A very large number of persons are due to this problem diagnosed as having a relapse (a return of someone’s underlying condition) and are being put back on antidepressants, sometimes for years or decades, or even lifelong.

Doctor’s advice unhelpful

The consequence of this is that many people who really want to get off the antidepressants leave their regular healthcare system and seek advice on peer support forums on how to come off their medications. Two peer support websites in English alone has some 900.000 hits a month, and almost half of them are from Europe.

There’s 180,000 people on these sort of websites. The research team of Dr Mark Horowitz surveyed 1,300 of them and found that three quarters of them considered their doctor’s advice was unhelpful. The story of many of them was similar. The most common tapering period that they had been recommended was 2 weeks and 4 weeks exactly like the guidelines of the public agency of the Department of Health and Social Care in England responsible for guidance, NICE, recommended, until it was updated recently.

Getting off antidepressants despite the doctors’ reassurances was a nightmare for many. Stories echo each other that the effects were so horrendous that the user had to get back on the antidepressant or otherwise would end up in a terrible state. The result is as many users expressed that “I’ve lost faith in my doctor.”

The underlying problem that has often been neglected is that years of use causes adaptation to the antidepressant drug and this adaptation persists for longer than it takes the drug to be eliminated from the body. That’s what causes withdrawal effects.

“When you stop the drug, let’s say months or years after the patient had been started on drug treatment following a stressful period in their life, the antidepressant is metabolized by the liver and kidneys in a few days or weeks. But what doesn’t change in a few days or weeks is the residual changes to the serotonin receptors and other systems downstream of this,” Dr. Horowitz explains.

In studies on humans, there are changes to the serotonergic system that persists for up to four years after the antidepressants are stopped.

The longer the harder

And the research indicates that the longer people are on the antidepressants, the harder it is to stop and the more severe the withdrawal effects.

For people who are on antidepressants for more than three years, in surveys two thirds are reporting withdrawal symptoms and half of those people are reporting symptoms that are moderately severe or severe.

“You can see clearly the more you’re adapted to a drug, the more difficult it is to stop it,” Dr Mark Horowitz explains.

And it is common as Dr Horowitz noted, “We have conducted a survey, of a group of people who are accessing therapy in the National Health Service (NHS) of England, two-fifths of them who have been on antidepressants have tried to stop and been unable to do so, and that correlated strongly with withdrawal effects.”

To minimize the risk of withdrawal effects, which more than half will experience using the commonly recommended procedures, certain principles about tapering antidepressants have to be known. The research indicates that the best approach to tapering is to perform it gradually (over months or sometimes years), and at a rate that the individual user can tolerate. Furthermore, it has to be done in smaller and smaller amounts.

Why tapering gradually

Dr Horowitz explained how to taper psychiatric drugs properly. Photo: THIX Photo.

Research using PET scanning on persons using different doses of antidepressants showed that the inhibition of the serotonin transporter doesn’t occur as a linear line, but according to a hyperbolic curve. This follows a pharmacological principle known as the law of mass action.

In more regular language, it means that as one adds more and more drug to the body’s system, more and more neurotransmitter receptors are saturated. And so, by the time one reaches a high dose, every extra milligram of drug has less and less incremental effect. And that’s why one get this hyperbola pattern. This pattern is true for all psychiatric drugs.

This explains why users experience problems in the last stages of withdrawing from a drug. Doctors in general practice have come to use an approach of linear decrease, like 20, 15, 10, 5, 0 mg.

Dr Mark Horowitz explains the findings not only from a neurobiological viewpoint, but very much how users have explained it, “going from 20 to 15 milligrams has a very small effect on the brain, 15 to 10 a little bit larger, 10 to 5 larger again, and going from 5 to 0 is like jumping off a cliff. You think you’re down near the bottom, but actually you’ve walked out the eighth story window, in my view.”

The first few milligrams are easy to come off, and the last few milligrams are much harder.

“When doctors don’t understand this relationship, they think people must need the drug because they’ve had huge trouble and they’re pushing people back on it,” Dr Mark Horowitz added.

Based on both neurobiological research and clinical observations it thus makes more pharmacological sense to not reduce drugs by a linear amount of dose, but to reduce drugs by a linear amount of effect on the brain.

The approach of reducing the drug rate so it causes an ‘even effect’ on the brain requires decreasing by smaller and smaller amounts down to tiny final doses. So final reduction from this tiny dose to zero doesn’t cause a bigger change in effect on the brain as previous reductions.

One could approximate this by talking about proportional reduction. So, for example, reducing by about 50 percent at every step, going down from 20 to 10 to 5 to 2.5 to 1.25 to 0.6 approximately causes even changes of effect on the brain. Some people will need even more gradual dose reductions – for example, reducing by 10% of the most recent dose every month, so that the size of the reduction gets smaller as the total dose gets smaller.

Caution on withdrawing from psychiatric drugs

In noting this Dr Mark Horowitz cautions, “It is important to say it’s very hard to guess what rate an individual can tolerate. As it’s something that can take two weeks or four years. That’s why it’s very important to take the approach of adjusting to the individual, making small reductions and seeing how they respond before deciding on further steps.”

If withdrawal symptoms become too severe, then the reduction should be halted or the dose increased until symptoms resolve and the reduction should then proceed to a slower pace.

In England the new NICE guidelines, which is not just for psychiatrists, but for GPs, recommends to slowly reduce the dose in a stepwise fashion, at each step prescribing a proportion of the previous dose.

For clinicians not only in England but everywhere there is now extensive guidance available. Dr Mark Horowitz has co-authored the recently published “Maudsley Deprescribing Guidelines”. It describes how to safely reduce every antidepressant, benzodiazepine, z-drug and gabapentanoid that’s licensed in Europe and America. The “Maudsley Deprescribing Guidelines” can be bought through the medical publisher Wiley and even through Amazon. A forthcoming version of the Guidelines due in 2025 will also include antipsychotic drugs and other psychiatric drug classes.

Author

Health & Society

EU treading Dangerous Waters: The Perils of Psychedelics in Therapeutic Use

Published

on

The European Commission is getting ready to review citizens’ proposals and one controversial idea on the table is the ‘PsychedeliCare’ initiative that supports the exploration and implementation of psychedelic treatments for mental wellbeing issues. Advocates of this initiative highlight the advantages of using psychedelics in addressing mental health concerns; however it’s crucial to carefully assess the consequences of making these substances mainstream for therapeutic use, it already happened with way too many “pharma products” and end up being dangerous street drugs, as this is what they actually were from the beginning.

The Illusory Promise of Psychedelics

Supporters of this “therapies” frequently promote these substances as amazing remedies for profound mental health challenges like depression and anxiety disorders such as PTSD are regularly highlighted by them in support of their claims. However, these early research findings are willfully misinterpreted and exaggerated. The “positive outcomes” observed in limited research studies do not automatically translate to safety and effectiveness across wider and more varied demographic groups, often the contrary. Throughout history the fascination with a quick fix for mental health issues has often resulted in disappointment and harm, if not death.

A Lack of Comprehensive Understanding

The insufficient scientific knowledge about psychedelics raises concerns within the community as the intricate workings of the human brain remain a mystery when influenced by these substances. There are risks such as psychological distress and worsening of preexisting mental health conditions that make it unthinkable to integrate psychedelics into mainstream therapy practices at all. It is crucial to acknowledge the variations in individual experiences and biological compositions to prevent unintended harm rather than aiding in treatment efforts.

Regulatory and Ethical Concerns

The push for government endorsement of psychedelic therapies raises numerous ethical questions. Should substances with known psychoactive properties be part of mainstream health care? The regulatory environment surrounding these compounds is fraught with challenges, including ensuring quality control, standardizing dosages, and preventing misuse. With the legalization movements in various regions, the potential for recreational abuse expands, risking public health and safety.

Historical Context and Social Implications

Looking back, the late 1960s and early 1970s were marked by a psychedelic counterculture that resulted in societal turmoil and increased drug abuse. The legacy of this era still looms large; many young individuals romanticize psychedelic use without regarding the severe consequences that accompanied its earlier popularity, including addiction, mental health crises, and a societal disregard for safety protocols.

A Dangerous Precedent

By calling for a more prominent role for psychedelics in treatment protocols, the advocates of the ‘PsychedeliCare’ initiative may unintentionally set a dangerous precedent. Replacing established, evidence-based treatments with unproven psychedelic therapies could detract from the very real progress made in mental health care. It could shift focus away from holistic approaches that consider lifestyle, therapeutic counseling, and medication tailored to individual needs.

Conclusion

The debate surrounding the ‘PsychedeliCare’ initiative should prompt a vigilant and cautious examination of the implications of endorsing psychedelics as treatment options. While there is a critical need for innovative approaches in mental health care, rushing to embrace unproven therapies poses significant risks. It is paramount that we prioritize rigorous scientific scrutiny, ethical considerations, and the well-being of individuals over the allure of quick solutions. The only clear path forward is one grounded in proven therapies, comprehensive research, and unwavering commitment to public health.

Author

Continue Reading

Health & Society

Why chocolate should not be given to dogs

Published

on

Chocolate is a favorite delicacy for people, but for cats and dogs it is a real poison, writes the magazine ” Sciences et Avenir” and explains why pets should not be “pampered” with chocolate under any circumstances.

For them, chocolate is toxic, because it is not properly absorbed by their body. This is due to the alkaloid theobromine, which is contained in cocoa and therefore in chocolate.

The substance becomes dangerous to health when large amounts of it are stored in the liver. About 12 grams of theobromine are contained in dark chocolate, twice as much in milk chocolate, and very small amounts in white chocolate.

Theobromine does not harm humans, as the human body manages to break it down quickly.

However, it takes 20 hours for dogs to get rid of this molecule. It can build up in their liver and cause poisoning if large amounts of chocolate are ingested at once.

Among the symptoms are vomiting, diarrhea, rapid pulse, convulsions.

The same is true for cats. However, they are less attracted to chocolate than dogs because they cannot taste sweets with their tongues, although there are exceptions.

In addition, pet obesity is the subject of a number of educational campaigns aimed at owners.

A court in North West England has banned a British man from keeping pets for the next 10 years because his Dalmatian became too fat. wrote the English tabloid “Sun” in November 2009.

40-year-old man John Green, a resident of Macclesfield in Cheshire, showed extreme irresponsibility towards his dog Barney and fed him chips and chocolate.

Thus, in just three months, it became several times fatter than normal for its breed and reached 70 kg.

Green was tipped off by alarmed, vigilant fellow citizens.

Animal control officials warned Green that his dog’s health was in danger and recommended that he be put on a diet.

However, he did not follow the recommendations and the dog continued to gain weight.

The Dalmatian was eventually removed from his owner’s home in June and put on a diet in a private kennel, where staff made sure he got enough exercise.

As a result, Barney, who is eight years old, lost 40 kg.

Green pleaded guilty to causing his dog unnecessary suffering, but the court found some mitigating circumstances because the man treated Barney more like a friend than a dog and did not realize he was harming him.

That’s why Green was only sentenced to 200 hours of community service and to pay £780 in costs.

Illustrative Photo by Glenn: https://www.pexels.com/photo/high-angle-photo-of-a-corgi-looking-upwards-2664417/

Author

Continue Reading

Health & Society

Russian Orthodox Church calls on mass culture to abandon ‘images promoting alcoholism’

Published

on

On the occasion of the Day of Sobriety celebrated in the country today, the Russian Orthodox Church called on mass culture not to promote alcoholism, TASS reported.

The agency recalls that the All-Russian Day of Sobriety is celebrated on the initiative of the Russian Orthodox Church on September 11 to remind people of the harm caused by alcohol. On this day, in some parts of Russia, the sale of alcohol is limited or completely prohibited.

“The culture of attitude towards this is very important. There are many “nice jokes” about alcoholism in our everyday culture. There is nothing good about that. We know what the state of intoxication leads to. Those who deal with mass culture should make an effort that the image of the “dear drunkard” should still leave our mass culture,” said the head of the synodal department of the Moscow Patriarchate for Church Interaction on the sidelines of the St. Petersburg Forum of United Cultures with society and media Vladimir Legoida.

Asked whether it would be appropriate to ban or restrict the sale of alcohol across the country, he said “that would be wonderful”. “But it is important that people do this consciously, independently, not because someone is forcing them, and also that there is, as it is customary to say, a public consensus,” he stated.

Legoida noted that the category of “sobriety” is important for the church in general, which refers not only to abstinence from alcohol.

Meanwhile, during a press conference dedicated to the All-Russian Day of Sobriety, Russia’s Deputy Health Minister Oleg Salagai said that alcohol abuse can reduce a man’s life expectancy by six years and a woman by five years.

“The systemic measures that were adopted allowed us to really reduce alcohol consumption. Today, it can be confidently said that Russia is not one of the most drinking countries in the world,” said the deputy minister, who pointed out that in 2023 alcohol consumption in the country was about 8.4 liters per person, while at the beginning of the century the indicator was in double digits.

Illustrative Photo by EVG Kowalievska: https://www.pexels.com/photo/selective-focus-photography-of-assorted-brand-liquor-bottles-1128259/

Author

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 EuroTimes

Exit mobile version