Connect with us

Politics

MEPs can get circa 18000€ monthly, A Closer Look Beyond the Numbers

Published

on

meps-can-get-circa-18000e-monthly,-a-closer-look-beyond-the-numbers

As Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) navigate the complexities of legislating for the European Union, scrutinizing the financial aspects of their compensation becomes imperative when knowing they can get circa 18000 euros monthly potentially tax-free. This critical analysis not only dissects the structure of their remuneration but also exposes instances of misuse and the apparent lack of transparency surrounding the actual figures involved.

Dissection of the salary/funds received by MEPs

  1. Basic Salary Structure:
image 1 MEPs can get circa 18000€ monthly, A Closer Look Beyond the Numbers

MEPs receive a basic salary subject to taxation, aiming to establish parity among member states. As of 01/07/2023, the monthly pre-tax salary of MEPs under the single statute is €10.075,18. After the deduction of EU taxes and insurance contributions, the net salary amounts to €7,853.89. Importantly, Member States may opt to subject this salary to national taxes as well. Contrary to popular belief, MEPs do not enjoy a tax-free income; they pay both EU taxes and potentially national taxes, contingent on the legislation of their home country (Example of Ireland).

  1. Additional Allowances:

While allowances like the daily allowance for attending parliamentary sessions appear justified, concerns linger about potential abuse. Reports of MEPs claiming allowances without active participation in parliamentary activities raise questions about the effectiveness of oversight mechanisms. The daily allowance, meant to cover expenses during sessions in Brussels or Strasbourg, stands at around €320 per day (which if they attend 20 days per month would be 6400€).

The general expenditure allowance, intended for office-related expenses, faces criticism due to its broad scope and vague guidelines. This lump sum, roughly €4,513 per month, lacks specificity, allowing for potential misuse without stringent accountability for taxpayer money.

  1. Special Parliamentary Allowance:

The special parliamentary allowance, earmarked for specific parliamentary expenses, has faced allegations of misuse. Instances of questionable expenses related to telecommunications and equipment expenditures draw attention to the need for tighter controls. The actual figures associated with this allowance remain elusive, contributing to the perception of opacity.

  1. Pension Scheme:

The pension scheme, providing financial security post-service, has been criticized for its perceived generosity. The lack of a direct link between MEPs’ performance and pension benefits raises questions about the incentive structure during their tenure. The exact figures allocated to the pension scheme from the European Parliament’s budget remain undisclosed, further complicating the assessment of its appropriateness.

Instances of Misuse and Lack of Transparency

There have been egregious instances where MEPs have misused funds meant for their official duties, tarnishing the credibility of the system. Nearly 140 EU lawmakers had to repay money to the European Parliament for misusing funds intended for assistants.

image MEPs can get circa 18000€ monthly, A Closer Look Beyond the Numbers
MEPs can get circa 18000€ monthly, A Closer Look Beyond the Numbers 3

In one instance, there was a report about an MEP hailing from Scotland who allegedly hired his wife and paid her an annual salary of approximately €25,000. This raised concerns regarding favouritism and the appropriate utilization of allowances. Furthermore, a French MEP was instructed by the EU Court of Justice to reimburse €300,000, for misappropriated funds. These instances shed light on instances where MEPs have exploited the salary and allowance system.

Conclusion:

The compensation and funds allotted to Members of the European Parliament, when dissected with a critical lens, reveal not only the figures involved but also instances of misuse and transparency gaps. A clear understanding of the actual amounts disbursed is crucial for public discourse and oversight.

To regain public trust, the European Parliament must address these concerns head-on. A comprehensive review of the compensation structure, coupled with stringent oversight mechanisms and transparent reporting, is essential. Only through a commitment to responsible financial practices can the European Parliament demonstrate its dedication to serving the best interests of its citizens.

Author

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

The leader of the independence protests in New Caledonia arrested

Published

on

the-leader-of-the-independence-protests-in-new-caledonia-arrested

Police in New Caledonia have arrested the leader of the country’s independence protest, Reuters reports. Christian Thane was detained before giving a press conference. Apart from Thane, seven other people have been arrested.

Thane led a branch of the Caledonian Union, which organized barricades in the capital Noumea that disrupted traffic, movement and food supplies. He was among the pro-independence political figures who met French President Emmanuel Macron during his visit to New Caledonia.

Nine people died, including two policemen, in the unrest that gripped New Caledonia last month after France proposed electoral reforms allowing thousands of French residents who have lived in the French Pacific territory for more than 10 years to vote.

Local Kanaks fear this will dilute the vote and make it more difficult to hold a future independence referendum. According to Paris, the measure is necessary to improve democracy.

Macron announced last week that he was suspending electoral reform. Pro-independence groups for New Caledonia want it to be fully withdrawn before dialogue on the island’s political future can begin again.

New Caledonia’s international airport reopened this week, although a curfew is still in place and several thousand French police reinforcements remain.

Illustrative Photo by Kindel Media: https://www.pexels.com/photo/a-person-s-hands-on-the-table-wearing-handcuffs-7773260/

Author

Continue Reading

Politics

Enlargement: how do countries join the EU?

Published

on

enlargement:-how-do-countries-join-the-eu?

EU enlargement is a way to foster peace and stability in Europe, increase prosperity for Europeans and create opportunities for companies.

Countries preparing to join benefit from closer ties with the EU, stronger support for fundamental rights as well as from funding and expertise from the EU to make the process easier.

In December 2023, EU leaders announced that the EU would recognise Georgia as a candidate country and would start accession talks with Ukraine and Moldova. The accession talks with Ukraine and Moldova formally started on 25 June 2024. In March 2024, EU leaders also agreed to launch accession talks with Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Which countries want to join the EU?

The EU has recognised Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, Moldova, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, Ukraine and Türkiye as candidate countries for EU membership, though accession negotiations with Türkiye have been frozen since 2018. This is something MEPs had called for on various occasions due to concerns over the situation in Türkiye, including the rule of law and media freedom.

Kosovo is a potential candidate country.

Who can join the EU? What are the requirements for EU membership?

In order to apply for EU membership, a country has to be European and respect the EU’s democratic values. It also needs stable institutions guaranteeing democracy and the rule of law; a functioning market economy; and the ability to take on and carry out the obligations of EU membership.

What support do candidate countries and potential candidate countries benefit from?

Candidate countries and potential candidate countries benefit from EU funding, detailed policy advice, as well as Association Agreements, giving far-reaching access to the EU’s internal market.

How does the enlargement process work?

A country can become an official candidate once it meets basic political, economic and reform criteria. It can then start formal negotiations on 35 chapters covering many different policy areas with the EU.

Once negotiations and reforms have been completed, an accession treaty is finalised, which needs to be ratified by all existing EU member states and the country itself before the country can join the EU.

What is the history of EU enlargement?

The EU started in 1952 as the European Communities with six founding members: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, and Netherlands. The first enlargement took part in 1973 when Denmark, Ireland and the UK joined.

In the 1980s, Greece joined in 1981, followed by Spain and Portugal five years later after emerging from dictatorships in the 1970s. In 1985 Greenland, which is an autonomous part of Denmark with a local government responsible for judicial affairs, policing and natural resources, became the first territory to leave the EU.

The fall of the Berlin Wall and the subsequent collapse of the Soviet Union changed everything again. In 1995 Austria, Finland and Sweden joined the EU. This was followed by two waves of Central and Eastern European countries joining. The Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia as well as Cyprus and Malta joined in 2004. In 2007, it was the turn of Bulgaria and Romania.

Croatia became the most recent country to join the EU in 2013. Meanwhile, the UK left the EU in 2020.

What is the current situation for EU enlargement?

Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 led to Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine submitting applications for EU membership. The EU formally launched accession talks with Moldova and Ukraine in June 2024, while Georgia was recognised as a candidate country in December 2023.

The EU is also keen to give Western Balkan countries, who have been part of the enlargement process for a long time, a clear path to membership to help stabilise the region and promote fundamental reforms and good neighbourly relations.

What is the role of the Parliament?

MEPs debate and vote on annual progress reports for each country, which is an opportunity to identify areas of concerns.

The Parliament’s approval is also required before a country can join the EU.

Parliament has remained supportive of the enlargement process. President Roberta Metsola called it the EU’s strongest geopolitical tool in a speech to the European Council in October 2023. “That is why the European Parliament had called for Ukraine and Moldova to receive EU candidate status,” she said. “This status gives a clear European perspective to these nations and serves as a powerful impetus for advancing democratic reforms. A quick look back at the last 20 years can illustrate the transformative power of enlargement. That is why we want to go the next step by the end of the year if those countries are ready.”

On various occasions Parliament called for the EU’s doors to be opened to Ukraine and Moldova. In July 2022 MEPs welcomed the Council decision to start the accession process with the two countries.

Parliament continues to support the accession of the Western Balkans countries to the EU. In a resolution adopted in June 2020, MEPs call on the EU to do more to make the enlargement process for these countries a success.

In a resolution adopted in December 2023, Parliament called on the EU to open accession talks with Moldova and Ukraine as well as with Bosnia and Herzegovina, provided the country takes certain reform steps. MEPs also called for a clear timetable to conclude negotiations by the end of this decade and for Georgia to be recognised as a candidate country.

Source: European Commission

Author

Continue Reading

Politics

Patriarch Bartholomew: To remain silent in the face of the cruelty of war is shameful!

Published

on

patriarch-bartholomew:-to-remain-silent-in-the-face-of-the-cruelty-of-war-is-shameful!

“War is always destructive. To remain silent in the face of the cruelty of war is shameful! It is our duty and mission to protect and promote peace. “Blessed are the peacemakers” (Matt. 5:9). With these words, His Holiness the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew began his short address to the International Summit for Peace in Ukraine, which was attended by leaders and representatives of about one hundred countries and international organizations, and which took place on June 15-16, 2024, in the Bürgenstock resort , Switzerland.

The Patriarch emphasized the importance and value of dialogue, which, in his words, is the driving force of this conference.

Regarding the granting of autocephaly to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, he emphasized that the Ecumenical Patriarchate responded to the “pastoral needs of the Orthodox believers in Ukraine”: “On January 5, 2019, in response to the pastoral needs of the Orthodox believers in Ukraine, the Ecumenical Patriarchate decreed the Orthodox Church of Ukraine as an autocephalous or self-governing ecclesiastical entity independent of the Moscow Patriarchate. And we did this despite all the difficulties and at any cost, because we firmly believe that Orthodox Christians in Ukraine deserve their own church voice. We are all here to support a just and lasting peace in a sovereign Ukraine. May God rest in peace all those who tragically lost their lives and give strength to all those who defend the peace.”

According to a press release, during the summit the Ecumenical Patriarch had the opportunity to meet and talk with the presidents of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky, France Emmanuel Macron and Georgia Salome Zourabishvili, with the Prime Minister of Greece Kyriakos Mitsotakis, the Vatican Secretary of State Monsignor Petro Parolin, with Hakan Fidan, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Turkey, and others.

An interesting detail of the picture of the meeting is the attempt to create a “problem” around the participation of the Ecumenical Patriarch, who attended the meeting as a representative of Turkey, but with the flag of the Patriarchate. Turkey was represented by its foreign minister, Hakan Fidan, and by Patriarch Bartholomew. Highlighting the coverage of the “church participation” in the meeting in the pro-Russian media was the status of the patriarch, who participated with the title of Ecumenical Patriarch. In Turkey, however, his status is recognized only as “Greek Patriarch of Fener”. The presence of his signature as “Ecumenical Patriarch” under the general declaration led the Turkish authorities to emphasize again that they do not recognize Patriarch Bartholomew such a title and role in world Orthodoxy that was inherited from the Byzantine Empire, and he is only the head of the “Greek religious minority ” in the country and can only represent him. The Turkish foreign minister also denied having an official personal meeting with the patriarch within the framework of the conference. This position particularly impresses the Russian policy aimed at compromising and belittling the role of the Ecumenical Patriarchate at all levels and on all occasions.

Turkish media also noted that the Vatican, which attended with observer status through its secretary of state, did not sign the joint declaration signed by Turkey. South Africa, Saudi Arabia, India, South Africa, Thailand, Indonesia, Mexico and the UAE did not sign the declaration. To date, the declaration has been signed by seventy-nine countries and six international organizations.

Author

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 EuroTimes