Connect with us

Health & Society

Antidepressants and brain stroke

Published

on

It’s cold, Paris at this time of the year is a chilly 83 per cent humidity, and the temperature is a mere three degrees. Fortunately, my usual café au lait and toast with butter and jam allow me to put the computer on the table to get closer to a story that once again takes us into the devastating world of death and the medical establishment.

In a newspaper, on 22 September 2001, many years ago, I came across a small blurb, you know, those short news items that appear in column form and which are used by newspaper editors to fill the page, which read as follows:

Bleeding risk with new antidepressants:
A study published in the latest edition of the British Medical Journal says that new-generation antidepressant drugs that inhibit the reabsorption of serotonin in the brain increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in older people. The research, carried out in several Canadian hospitals, found in particular that the chance of suffering from such a disorder is increased by 10 percent.

Although the research was carried out in a Canadian hospital, the reality is that in the last twenty years, the intake of antidepressants in the world’s population has been and continues to be alarming. The big pharmaceutical industries, aided by general practitioners, the media and psychiatrists, have implanted the idea that any emotional state that upsets us can be declared a “mental illness” and medicated with some glee with new generation antidepressants.

I myself was at the doctor’s in 2010 and the doctor who attended me, when I told her about my state of mind, of a certain apathy, because I had just gone through a process of deep mourning in which I was still immersed, without considering any other type of treatment, prescribed me antidepressants, which of course I did not take. However, every time I visit my doctor for any document related to any test, I am astonished to see that my medical records show me as a person suffering from depression. If I had decided to take medication at that time, today I would be a chronically ill person crammed with pills for my “depressive” treatment.

In November 2022, a geriatric portal published a report with a devastating headline: Cases of stroke will increase by 34% in the next decade in Europe. The Spanish Society of Neurology (SEN) pointed out that 12.2 million people in the world will suffer a stroke in 2022 and 6.5 million will die. It also stated that more than 110 million people who had suffered a stroke were in a situation of disability.

According to the association and others consulted, the possible causes of stroke include high blood pressure, smoking, physical inactivity, an unhealthy diet, obesity, excessive alcohol consumption, atrial fibrillation, high blood lipid levels, diabetes mellitus, genetics, stress, etc. It seems that living, in general, causes stroke. Once again, medicine lays a huge deck of cards on the table so that whatever card you are dealt, you have no choice but to medicate yourself. And especially for stress or tension, anxiolytics and antidepressants.

In my modest research on the relationship between old age and stroke, I have come across some truly terrifying articles that place all the blame, as justice would have it, of the ordeal on the elderly person (I am an elderly person myself). In an article published on 28 November this year (2023) and entitled: La depresión, un problema de salud pública entre la población mayor (Depression, a public health problem among the elderly). Among the frightening symptoms that can diagnose such a chronic illness, the following can be read:

Depression has become a public health problem that deserves special attention because of its effects on cognitive decline in older people. Its symptoms can vary and affect both the physical and emotional well-being of sufferers.

Common symptoms include loss of energy or constant fatigue, boredom, sadness or apathy, low self-esteem, nervousness, restlessness, delusions, unwarranted fear, feelings of worthlessness, mild cognitive impairment, unexplained or chronic pain and some behavioural disturbances.

Social factors that should in no case be treated with antidepressants. To label such problems as a case of public health is a disgrace that is being imposed in order to permanently medicate people who should only be helped to feel useful again. To claim that such people are “a burden” is to dispossess them of their fundamental rights, especially when they end up in nursing homes not for social and emotional reintegration, but only as “cattle” to be fed and stuffed with drugs until they die and are no longer a nuisance.

Over-medication is a risk factor, especially in people who are already grey-haired. Studies on what causes a certain disease, carried out in any university in the world or “accredited” body, do not necessarily, if ever, analyse who causes it. That is why whenever we are prescribed anything, we should not be tired of asking at all times, even to internet search engines to show us and clarify every last molecule of doubt we have. And if not, I recommend spending a few dollars (euros) to buy a book or two critical of the medical system. I always recommend, because of the author and his medical training, one of these two books: How to survive in an overmedicated world, or Medicines that kill and organised crime.

The global health care system wants us to be over-medicated. Medicine should only be used very occasionally. If we need to be constantly at the doctor’s, then something is wrong, let’s read the pills we take, the side effects they cause, and it may turn out that we are falling into a self-destructive spiral guided by the one-eyed leading the blind.

But as I always say, as I finish my already cold coffee, my articles, my observations, have nothing to do with the honest medical class that tries to bring us closer together so that our health becomes better and better and more stable. And in the same way, it is also convenient for us to be aware of the life we lead. Is it healthy? If it is not, let’s change it.

References:
Los casos de ictus aumentarán un 34% en la próxima década en Europa (geriatricarea.com)
La depresión, un problema de salud pública entre la población mayor (geriatricarea.com)
Diario La Razón, sábado, 22/IX/2021, pág. 35 (España)

Author

Health & Society

EU treading Dangerous Waters: The Perils of Psychedelics in Therapeutic Use

Published

on

The European Commission is getting ready to review citizens’ proposals and one controversial idea on the table is the ‘PsychedeliCare’ initiative that supports the exploration and implementation of psychedelic treatments for mental wellbeing issues. Advocates of this initiative highlight the advantages of using psychedelics in addressing mental health concerns; however it’s crucial to carefully assess the consequences of making these substances mainstream for therapeutic use, it already happened with way too many “pharma products” and end up being dangerous street drugs, as this is what they actually were from the beginning.

The Illusory Promise of Psychedelics

Supporters of this “therapies” frequently promote these substances as amazing remedies for profound mental health challenges like depression and anxiety disorders such as PTSD are regularly highlighted by them in support of their claims. However, these early research findings are willfully misinterpreted and exaggerated. The “positive outcomes” observed in limited research studies do not automatically translate to safety and effectiveness across wider and more varied demographic groups, often the contrary. Throughout history the fascination with a quick fix for mental health issues has often resulted in disappointment and harm, if not death.

A Lack of Comprehensive Understanding

The insufficient scientific knowledge about psychedelics raises concerns within the community as the intricate workings of the human brain remain a mystery when influenced by these substances. There are risks such as psychological distress and worsening of preexisting mental health conditions that make it unthinkable to integrate psychedelics into mainstream therapy practices at all. It is crucial to acknowledge the variations in individual experiences and biological compositions to prevent unintended harm rather than aiding in treatment efforts.

Regulatory and Ethical Concerns

The push for government endorsement of psychedelic therapies raises numerous ethical questions. Should substances with known psychoactive properties be part of mainstream health care? The regulatory environment surrounding these compounds is fraught with challenges, including ensuring quality control, standardizing dosages, and preventing misuse. With the legalization movements in various regions, the potential for recreational abuse expands, risking public health and safety.

Historical Context and Social Implications

Looking back, the late 1960s and early 1970s were marked by a psychedelic counterculture that resulted in societal turmoil and increased drug abuse. The legacy of this era still looms large; many young individuals romanticize psychedelic use without regarding the severe consequences that accompanied its earlier popularity, including addiction, mental health crises, and a societal disregard for safety protocols.

A Dangerous Precedent

By calling for a more prominent role for psychedelics in treatment protocols, the advocates of the ‘PsychedeliCare’ initiative may unintentionally set a dangerous precedent. Replacing established, evidence-based treatments with unproven psychedelic therapies could detract from the very real progress made in mental health care. It could shift focus away from holistic approaches that consider lifestyle, therapeutic counseling, and medication tailored to individual needs.

Conclusion

The debate surrounding the ‘PsychedeliCare’ initiative should prompt a vigilant and cautious examination of the implications of endorsing psychedelics as treatment options. While there is a critical need for innovative approaches in mental health care, rushing to embrace unproven therapies poses significant risks. It is paramount that we prioritize rigorous scientific scrutiny, ethical considerations, and the well-being of individuals over the allure of quick solutions. The only clear path forward is one grounded in proven therapies, comprehensive research, and unwavering commitment to public health.

Author

Continue Reading

Health & Society

Why chocolate should not be given to dogs

Published

on

Chocolate is a favorite delicacy for people, but for cats and dogs it is a real poison, writes the magazine ” Sciences et Avenir” and explains why pets should not be “pampered” with chocolate under any circumstances.

For them, chocolate is toxic, because it is not properly absorbed by their body. This is due to the alkaloid theobromine, which is contained in cocoa and therefore in chocolate.

The substance becomes dangerous to health when large amounts of it are stored in the liver. About 12 grams of theobromine are contained in dark chocolate, twice as much in milk chocolate, and very small amounts in white chocolate.

Theobromine does not harm humans, as the human body manages to break it down quickly.

However, it takes 20 hours for dogs to get rid of this molecule. It can build up in their liver and cause poisoning if large amounts of chocolate are ingested at once.

Among the symptoms are vomiting, diarrhea, rapid pulse, convulsions.

The same is true for cats. However, they are less attracted to chocolate than dogs because they cannot taste sweets with their tongues, although there are exceptions.

In addition, pet obesity is the subject of a number of educational campaigns aimed at owners.

A court in North West England has banned a British man from keeping pets for the next 10 years because his Dalmatian became too fat. wrote the English tabloid “Sun” in November 2009.

40-year-old man John Green, a resident of Macclesfield in Cheshire, showed extreme irresponsibility towards his dog Barney and fed him chips and chocolate.

Thus, in just three months, it became several times fatter than normal for its breed and reached 70 kg.

Green was tipped off by alarmed, vigilant fellow citizens.

Animal control officials warned Green that his dog’s health was in danger and recommended that he be put on a diet.

However, he did not follow the recommendations and the dog continued to gain weight.

The Dalmatian was eventually removed from his owner’s home in June and put on a diet in a private kennel, where staff made sure he got enough exercise.

As a result, Barney, who is eight years old, lost 40 kg.

Green pleaded guilty to causing his dog unnecessary suffering, but the court found some mitigating circumstances because the man treated Barney more like a friend than a dog and did not realize he was harming him.

That’s why Green was only sentenced to 200 hours of community service and to pay £780 in costs.

Illustrative Photo by Glenn: https://www.pexels.com/photo/high-angle-photo-of-a-corgi-looking-upwards-2664417/

Author

Continue Reading

Health & Society

Russian Orthodox Church calls on mass culture to abandon ‘images promoting alcoholism’

Published

on

On the occasion of the Day of Sobriety celebrated in the country today, the Russian Orthodox Church called on mass culture not to promote alcoholism, TASS reported.

The agency recalls that the All-Russian Day of Sobriety is celebrated on the initiative of the Russian Orthodox Church on September 11 to remind people of the harm caused by alcohol. On this day, in some parts of Russia, the sale of alcohol is limited or completely prohibited.

“The culture of attitude towards this is very important. There are many “nice jokes” about alcoholism in our everyday culture. There is nothing good about that. We know what the state of intoxication leads to. Those who deal with mass culture should make an effort that the image of the “dear drunkard” should still leave our mass culture,” said the head of the synodal department of the Moscow Patriarchate for Church Interaction on the sidelines of the St. Petersburg Forum of United Cultures with society and media Vladimir Legoida.

Asked whether it would be appropriate to ban or restrict the sale of alcohol across the country, he said “that would be wonderful”. “But it is important that people do this consciously, independently, not because someone is forcing them, and also that there is, as it is customary to say, a public consensus,” he stated.

Legoida noted that the category of “sobriety” is important for the church in general, which refers not only to abstinence from alcohol.

Meanwhile, during a press conference dedicated to the All-Russian Day of Sobriety, Russia’s Deputy Health Minister Oleg Salagai said that alcohol abuse can reduce a man’s life expectancy by six years and a woman by five years.

“The systemic measures that were adopted allowed us to really reduce alcohol consumption. Today, it can be confidently said that Russia is not one of the most drinking countries in the world,” said the deputy minister, who pointed out that in 2023 alcohol consumption in the country was about 8.4 liters per person, while at the beginning of the century the indicator was in double digits.

Illustrative Photo by EVG Kowalievska: https://www.pexels.com/photo/selective-focus-photography-of-assorted-brand-liquor-bottles-1128259/

Author

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 EuroTimes

Exit mobile version