Travel
What is Skiplagging? The cheap flight hack that airlines are cracking down on
Skiplagging could save you money but there are some significant risks and downsides to this cheap travel trick.
The price of airline tickets has reached an all-time high this year. With costs soaring, passengers are desperately searching for cheap flights.
Some methods, however, are riskier than others – like skiplagging. Also known as ‘hidden city’ or ‘throwaway’ ticketing, this practice has become increasingly popular over the last few years.
The cheap ticket hack involves buying a less expensive ticket with a layover in the city you want to travel to and then not catching the second flight.
There are a number of downsides and you’re unlikely to be popular with the airline you fly with if you’re caught skiplagging.
So how exactly does it work and what are the drawbacks?
How does skiplagging work?
Skiplagging is when you book an indirect flight that costs less than a direct flight and then you don’t take the connection. It is a way of finding a nonstop flight without the price tag that often comes with these tickets.
Say, for example, you wanted to fly from Geneva to Madrid. A ticket to somewhere else in Spain like Culleredo with a layover in the Spanish capital could save you around 20 per cent. You wouldn’t travel on to Culleredo and would instead leave the airport in Madrid without using the second half of your ticket.
You could save money on longer distance journeys too. A last-minute skiplagged ticket from Birmingham, UK to New York, US could save you around €100.
Finding fares like this on your own isn’t easy though it can be done with price comparison sites like Kayak or even Google Flights. But a dedicated website – Skiplagged – was founded in 2013 for people to search for these hidden city fares.
Its homepage states “Our flights are so cheap, United (Airlines) sued us…but we won” giving you a bit of a clue on how airlines feel about this practice.
What are the downsides of hidden city ticketing?
Despite the cheap fares, there are some drawbacks to skiplagging – like not being able to check in your bags.
Your ticket is for the final destination of the journey meaning if you check in your bags, that’s where they will end up. Some seasoned flight hackers even recommend travelling with nothing larger than a rucksack due to the chance that you could be asked to check your luggage on a busy flight. Read these expert tips on how to travel with only hand luggage.
Using a round-trip ticket is also unlikely to work. Airlines are likely to cancel the return portion if they notice what you’ve done.
“Travellers who do decide to skiplag should always book one-way tickets, that way their return trip won’t be cancelled if the airline does cancel their ticket,” warns Edward Russell, airlines reporter for industry publications Skift and Airlines Weekly.
There’s also a chance that the hidden city you are aiming for might not actually be where you end up. Scheduling, rerouting and complicated logistics are an integral part of planning flights.
This means that your connecting city could change leaving you with a ticket to nowhere near where you want to go.
Why don’t airlines like skiplagging?
“Airlines price tickets based on the market and competition, not necessarily the distance of the flight. That’s why a short trip is often more expensive than a long one,” Russell explains.
He uses the example of the Tampa, Florida to Charlotte, North Carolina route in the US. Though Tampa is typically a cheap place to fly to because of the prevalence of budget carriers, this particular route is dominated by American Airlines.
“So American [Airlines] can charge as much as they want for trips just between Tampa and Charlotte. But if a traveller is flying between, say, Tampa and New York they have lots of choices, so American [Airlines] is likely to match those fares Tampa-New York fares even if the itinerary includes a stop in Charlotte.”
“In short, market competition dictates airfares more than distance or any other factor,” Russell concludes.
An empty seat is also one that could have been sold to another paying passenger. Airlines claim that this means they lose money when passengers don’t continue to their final destination.
Virtually all airlines explicitly prohibit skiplagging in their terms of service with varying degrees of consequences if you are caught.
That could mean anything from cancelling loyalty benefits like points that you’ve accrued through flights all the way through to being banned from travelling with a particular carrier ever again or even lawsuits.
In July this year, a teenager in the US attempted to use this hack to travel from Gainesville in Florida to New York with a stop in Charlotte, North Carolina – his actual intended destination. But American Airlines discovered what he was up to and he was pulled aside by a gate agent.
Eventually, after the teen admitted he had no intention of travelling on to New York, a representative from the airline cancelled his ticket.
Reports from local media claim that the flight was purchased using the Skiplagged website. The teenager’s father has said that they have used the site to book travel “almost exclusively for the last five to eight years”.
Is skiplagging legal?
With airlines so against the practice, you might be wondering whether choosing to leave the airport at your layover destination is legal. The answer is broadly yes but that doesn’t mean it comes without consequences.
“The practice, while discouraged by airlines and barred in their contract of carriage, is rarely against the law,” Russell explains.
You do need to make sure that you have the correct visas and entry requirements for the country you intend to visit, however, just like you would with a direct flight.
There have been cases where airlines have sued passengers but Russell says they are rare.
In 2019, Lufthansa attempted to take a passenger to court for booking a hidden city fare. They were requesting more than €2,000 for the cost of what was a multi-city flight instead of the round trip ticket. It was thrown out of a low-level court at first then Lufthansa appealed the decision and then eventually withdrew from the case unexpectedly.
“Travellers should worry more about potentially being banned from an airline – something airlines can do – than facing criminal charges,” Russell adds.
Travel
Brits could soon enjoy shorter passport control queues at EU airports. Here’s why
British holidaymakers will soon be able to use e-gates at more EU airports, the UK government has announced.
It comes as part of negotiations between the UK government and the European Union to finalise a ‘post-Brexit reset deal’.
It means British passport holders will no longer have to wait at manned desks and will instead be allowed to use fast-track e-gates usually reserved for EU or European Economic Area citizens.
EU Relations Minister Nick Thomas-Symonds said this would give British travellers “more time to spend on holiday or work trips […] doing what you want, not being stuck in queues.”
The UK government said the move would end “the dreaded queues at border control.”
UK travellers have to join ‘other nations’ queue at EU airports
Following Brexit, UK citizens forfeited their privileged status when travelling to EU countries.
They now fall into the ‘visa-exempt third-country nationals’ category – the same classification as travellers from dozens of countries, including Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Singapore.
This has meant British travellers must join the ‘other nations’ queue at border control rather than using the expedited EU lanes.
The requirement to check that British travellers meet entry conditions is a significant obstacle to allowing them to use the fast-track lanes.
EU border control has to verify that UK travellers are not in breach of the 90-day stay limit in 180 days and that they have the means to return to their country of origin, i.e. a flight ticket out of the EU.
Frontier officials must also stamp the passenger’s passport.
This change often translates to extended waiting times, especially at busy European airports like Amsterdam Schiphol, Milan Malpensa, and Paris Charles de Gaulle.
Waits exceeding an hour have become commonplace, especially when arriving shortly after large international flights.
These delays affect not only entry into EU countries but also departure, as British travellers must undergo exit checks that sometimes result in missed flights due to lengthy queues.
UK travellers will be able to use e-gates at many European airports
Under the new deal, British travellers will be able to take advantage of the faster e-gate passport checks at many EU airports.
No details have yet been released on when this will be introduced and where, although the BBC reported that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer “has called on all EU members to co-operate without delay.”
Some EU airports will likely allow UK travellers to use existing e-gates reserved for EU citizens, while others may install dedicated ‘third-country national’ e-gates.
The latter are already in place across Italy, including Venice Marco Polo and Rome Fiumicino, as well as at Amsterdam Schiphol and Lisbon.
With this system, once the traveller passes through the gate, there is a brief check by border officials who will also stamp passports.
Brits will use e-gates in all airports after introduction of EES
In addition, the UK government underlined that there will be “no legal barriers to e-gate use for British Nationals travelling to and from European Union Member States after the introduction of the European Union Entry/Exit System [EES].”
The EES is scheduled to come into force in October this year. The system will register non-EU visitors who don’t need a visa digitally, removing the need for physical stamps.
New pet passports will make it easier for Brits to bring pets into EU
The UK government also announced that new pet passports will be introduced as part of the deal.
This means UK cats and dogs will be able to travel “more easily” from the UK into the EU by “eliminating the need for animal health certificates for every trip.”
Travel
Three killed in lightning strike at Cambodia’s Angkor Wat UNESCO temple complex
Three people have been killed and several others injured after they were struck by lightning during a visit to Cambodia’s famous Angkor Wat temple complex.
They group had been seeking shelter around the main temple of the UNESCO site when the lightning strike happened late on Friday afternoon.
Video posted on social media showed two ambulances arriving in the aftermath and onlookers and site officials carrying some of the injured people and helping others out on foot.
Other images showed multiple people being treated in hospital.
The day after the incident, Cambodia’s Minister of Tourism Hout Hak issued a statement telling people to take down online posts about the incident, saying the spreading of “negative information” could harm the country’s tourism sector.
Authorities have released no information about the strike, but an official on Monday, speaking on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the issue, confirmed to the Associated Press that the three people killed were all Cambodian nationals.
The Cambodian Red Cross also posted an update saying it had delivered care packages to the families of two of the victims, a 34-year-old man and a 52-year-old woman.
The Red Cross refused to comment further by phone.
A spokesman for the Angkor Wat site did not respond to requests for comment, nor did a regional health official.
Angkor Wat is Cambodia’s best-known tourist attraction, attracting some 2.5 million visitors annually and is featured prominently on the country’s flag.
UNESCO calls the site, which sprawls across some 400 square kilometres and contains the ruins of Khmer Empire capitals from the 9th to the 15th centuries, one of the most important archaeological sites in Southeast Asia.
Cambodia has been actively developing the area to attract more visitors, including opening a new $1.1 billion (€890 million) Chinese-funded airport in nearby Siem Reap.
Its move to relocate some 10,000 families squatting in the Angkor Wat area to a new settlement has drawn widespread criticism from human rights groups and UNESCO itself has also expressed concern.
Cambodian authorities have said the families are being voluntarily relocated, but Amnesty International and other groups have questioned how voluntary those relocations have been.
Travel
‘Leave them where they belong’: Bruges implores tourists to stop stealing cobblestones
Tourists have been caught smuggling all kinds of stolen souvenirs home from holidays, from artefacts picked up in Pompeii to sand from Italy’s famous pink beach on the island of Sardinia.
The Belgian city of Bruges is the latest victim of keepsake crime, but the item visitors have taken a fancy to is unexpected.
The city council has reported the theft of dozens of cobblestones from the city centre, and suspects tourists are the culprits.
Tourists suspected of pilfering Bruges’ cobblestones
Bruges’ cobblestones are increasingly being pilfered from well-known spots in the UNESCO-designated historic centre, public property councillor Franky Demon reported this week.
“At iconic locations such as Minnewater, Vismarkt, Markt and Gruuthusemuseum, it is estimated that 50 to 70 pieces of cobblestone disappear every month. And that number could be even higher,” Demon told press.
“The phenomenon increases significantly, especially during busy tourist periods such as spring and summer,” he added.
For this reason, authorities suspect visitors are pocketing the stone as souvenirs.
‘Leave that cobblestone where it belongs’
As well as damaging a valuable part of the city’s heritage, the stolen stones have created safety issues.
The gaps from removed stones present trip hazards for pedestrians – and are costly to repair.
“It’s unfortunate that our employees constantly have to go out to fix potholes and loose stones. This causes a lot of additional work and costs: about 200 euros per square metre of reconstruction,” explained Demon.
The councillor urged visitors to respect the historical environment of Bruges.
“We simply ask for respect. Anyone walking through Bruges crosses centuries of history. Leave that cobblestone where it belongs,” he said.
Bruges’ cobblestones are apparently not the only sought-after street souvenir.
Along the famous Paris-Roubaix cycling route, tourists are known to pilfer parts of the pavement.
While Rome’s iconic ‘sampietrini’ – cobblestones made of solidified lava – have also disappeared into suitcases over the years.
-
EU & the World6 days ago
Who Is Valeria Marquez? About the Influencer Who Was Shot During Livestream
-
EU & the World4 days ago
Chris Brown Tour 2025: Updates on Concert Dates, Cities, Ticket Prices & More
-
EU & the World5 days ago
Who Is Ben Cohen? About the Ben & Jerry’s Co-Founder Who Was Arrested During Senate Hearing
-
EU & the World3 days ago
Josh Freese: 5 Things to Know About the Former Foo Fighters Drummer
-
Travel7 days ago
Crete earthquake: Is it safe to travel to the Greek island following tsunami warning?
-
EU & the World5 days ago
Chris Brown’s Net Worth: How Much Money He Makes Now
-
Entertainment4 days ago
Eurovision 2025: Music, Politics, and the Final 26 Set Amid Controversy and Spectacle
-
Sports4 days ago
Ferrari, opposing views after first day at Imola for Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton