Connect with us

Travel

What is Skiplagging? The cheap flight hack that airlines are cracking down on

Published

on

Skiplagging could save you money but there are some significant risks and downsides to this cheap travel trick.

The price of airline tickets has reached an all-time high this year. With costs soaring, passengers are desperately searching for cheap flights.

Some methods, however, are riskier than others – like skiplagging. Also known as ‘hidden city’ or ‘throwaway’ ticketing, this practice has become increasingly popular over the last few years.

The cheap ticket hack involves buying a less expensive ticket with a layover in the city you want to travel to and then not catching the second flight.

There are a number of downsides and you’re unlikely to be popular with the airline you fly with if you’re caught skiplagging.

So how exactly does it work and what are the drawbacks?

How does skiplagging work?

Skiplagging is when you book an indirect flight that costs less than a direct flight and then you don’t take the connection. It is a way of finding a nonstop flight without the price tag that often comes with these tickets.

Say, for example, you wanted to fly from Geneva to Madrid. A ticket to somewhere else in Spain like Culleredo with a layover in the Spanish capital could save you around 20 per cent. You wouldn’t travel on to Culleredo and would instead leave the airport in Madrid without using the second half of your ticket.

You could save money on longer distance journeys too. A last-minute skiplagged ticket from Birmingham, UK to New York, US could save you around €100.

Finding fares like this on your own isn’t easy though it can be done with price comparison sites like Kayak or even Google Flights. But a dedicated website – Skiplagged – was founded in 2013 for people to search for these hidden city fares.

Its homepage states “Our flights are so cheap, United (Airlines) sued us…but we won” giving you a bit of a clue on how airlines feel about this practice.

What are the downsides of hidden city ticketing?

Despite the cheap fares, there are some drawbacks to skiplagging – like not being able to check in your bags.

Your ticket is for the final destination of the journey meaning if you check in your bags, that’s where they will end up. Some seasoned flight hackers even recommend travelling with nothing larger than a rucksack due to the chance that you could be asked to check your luggage on a busy flight. Read these expert tips on how to travel with only hand luggage.

Using a round-trip ticket is also unlikely to work. Airlines are likely to cancel the return portion if they notice what you’ve done.

“Travellers who do decide to skiplag should always book one-way tickets, that way their return trip won’t be cancelled if the airline does cancel their ticket,” warns Edward Russell, airlines reporter for industry publications Skift and Airlines Weekly.

There’s also a chance that the hidden city you are aiming for might not actually be where you end up. Scheduling, rerouting and complicated logistics are an integral part of planning flights.

This means that your connecting city could change leaving you with a ticket to nowhere near where you want to go.

Why don’t airlines like skiplagging?

“Airlines price tickets based on the market and competition, not necessarily the distance of the flight. That’s why a short trip is often more expensive than a long one,” Russell explains.

He uses the example of the Tampa, Florida to Charlotte, North Carolina route in the US. Though Tampa is typically a cheap place to fly to because of the prevalence of budget carriers, this particular route is dominated by American Airlines.

“So American [Airlines] can charge as much as they want for trips just between Tampa and Charlotte. But if a traveller is flying between, say, Tampa and New York they have lots of choices, so American [Airlines] is likely to match those fares Tampa-New York fares even if the itinerary includes a stop in Charlotte.”

“In short, market competition dictates airfares more than distance or any other factor,” Russell concludes.

An empty seat is also one that could have been sold to another paying passenger. Airlines claim that this means they lose money when passengers don’t continue to their final destination.

Virtually all airlines explicitly prohibit skiplagging in their terms of service with varying degrees of consequences if you are caught.

That could mean anything from cancelling loyalty benefits like points that you’ve accrued through flights all the way through to being banned from travelling with a particular carrier ever again or even lawsuits.

In July this year, a teenager in the US attempted to use this hack to travel from Gainesville in Florida to New York with a stop in Charlotte, North Carolina – his actual intended destination. But American Airlines discovered what he was up to and he was pulled aside by a gate agent.

Eventually, after the teen admitted he had no intention of travelling on to New York, a representative from the airline cancelled his ticket.

Reports from local media claim that the flight was purchased using the Skiplagged website. The teenager’s father has said that they have used the site to book travel “almost exclusively for the last five to eight years”.

Is skiplagging legal?

With airlines so against the practice, you might be wondering whether choosing to leave the airport at your layover destination is legal. The answer is broadly yes but that doesn’t mean it comes without consequences.

“The practice, while discouraged by airlines and barred in their contract of carriage, is rarely against the law,” Russell explains.

You do need to make sure that you have the correct visas and entry requirements for the country you intend to visit, however, just like you would with a direct flight.

There have been cases where airlines have sued passengers but Russell says they are rare.

In 2019, Lufthansa attempted to take a passenger to court for booking a hidden city fare. They were requesting more than €2,000 for the cost of what was a multi-city flight instead of the round trip ticket. It was thrown out of a low-level court at first then Lufthansa appealed the decision and then eventually withdrew from the case unexpectedly.

“Travellers should worry more about potentially being banned from an airline – something airlines can do – than facing criminal charges,” Russell adds.

Author

  • Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Travel

A 4-year cruise or a €1 house in Italy: Inside the schemes helping Americans skip Trump’s presidency

Published

on

Searches by Americans for moving abroad soared in the 24 hours after the first polls closed, according to Google data.

Following the recent US election result, Google searches for ‘how to move to Europe’ increased by more than 1,000 per cent in some countries.

Searches by Americans for moving to Canada and Australia soared by 1,270 and 820 per cent respectively in the 24 hours after the first polls closed, according to Google data.

The interest in leaving the States has not gone unnoticed by marketing firms.

A residential cruise ship is now offering Americans a four-year ‘escape’ trip while a Sardinian village has relaunched its €1 house scheme.

Cruise company offers four-year escape from Trump

Cruise firm Villa Vie Residences is marketing a four-year round the world trip to Americans looking to skip Donald Trump’s second term as president.

The Tour La Vie programme offers passengers a stay of up to four years onboard while visiting 140 countries – which doesn’t include the US.

The irreverently named packages include a one-year ‘Escape from Reality’ cruise, a two-year ‘Mid-Term Selection’ option, a three-year ‘Everywhere but Home’ cruise, and the four-year ‘Skip Forward’ trip.

Guests would join the Villa Vie Odyssey, a residential cruise ship which set sail from Belfast in September, several months into its voyage.

“We came up with this marketing campaign before we even knew who would win. Regardless of who would have won, you would have half of the population upset,” CEO Mikael Petterson told US news site Newsweek.

“Quite frankly, we don’t have a political view one way or the other. We just wanted to give people who feel threatened to have a way to get out.”

Prices start at a little under $40,000 (€38,000) a year. For those opting for the full four-year escape, single-occupancy cabins start at $256,000 (€243,000) while double-occupancy costs up to $320,000 (€303,000).

The price includes all food and drinks (alcohol only at dinner), WiFi, medical visits, weekly housekeeping service and bi-weekly laundry.

Sardinian village relaunches €1 house scheme for Americans

In rural Sardinia, the village of Ollolai has revived its €1 house scheme, now targeting Americans exhausted by the election.

The homes-for-the-price-of-an-espresso offer has been relaunched for US citizens “worned [sic] out by global politics” and “looking to embrace a more balanced lifestyle”, local authorities write on the village’s website.

“Of course, we can’t specifically mention the name of one US president who just got elected, but we all know that he’s the one from whom many Americans want to get away from now and leave the country,” village mayor Francesco Columbo told US news site CNN.

“We have specifically created this website now to meet US post-elections relocation needs.”

Those needs include slowing down and recharging with Ollolai’s dreamy Mediterranean lifestyle.

“Nestled in pristine nature, surrounded by incredible cuisine, and immersed in a community with ancient traditions in the rare Earth’s Blue Zone, Ollolai is the perfect destination to reconnect, recharge and embrace a new way of life,” the website claims.

Available properties will soon be listed online with prices ranging from €1 for houses needing substantial renovations to €100,000 for those that are ready to live in.

This is not the first time the village in Sardinia has put houses for a pittance on the market. In a bid to halt a steep population decline, Ollolai began selling off abandoned homes in 2018 to people willing to carry out $25,000 (€24,000) of renovations within a three-year timespan.

Author

  • Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Travel

Catalonia’s holiday rental ban may not be allowed under EU law as Airbnb pushes back

Published

on

Catalonia has said they want to rid Barcelona of its 10,000 holiday lets in the next 5 years.

Catalonia’s recent ban on Airbnb-style holiday rentals breaches EU law, according to a complaint filed with the European Commission by an industry group.

The European Holiday Home Association claims that the ban, introduced by Catalonia in June this year, breaches the provision of services directive.

The Spanish region announced that they wanted to rid Barcelona of its 10,000 tourist flat licences over the next five years. The city has not granted new licences since 2014 but this has not helped to stem a housing crisis, with locals saying they can not find places to live at affordable prices.

Why has Barcelona’s Airbnb ban been challenged?

“We are convinced that EU law has not been respected,” Viktorija Molnar, Secretary General of the European Holiday Home Association (EHHA), said in a statement released on Wednesday.

“By submitting the EU complaint, we hope that the European Commission will take a step further and open a formal infringement procedure against Spain,” added Molnar, whose group represents short-term rental platforms like Airbnb and Expedia’s Vrbo.

The move follows legal concerns raised by the European Commission itself that restrictions brought in by the Spanish region were disproportionate to the aim of tackling housing shortages.

EHHA argues that “unjustified, disproportionate and unsuitable” restrictions breach the EU’s Services Directive, which regulates a swathe of activities from hotels to legal advice. They also said that claims about the impact of Airbnb on housing affordability are “politically inflamed”.

The lobby group may have support from the European Commission itself, whose officials wrote to Spanish authorities to protest the law in February according to a document seen by Euronews Travel.

“The Commission services consider that the restrictions laid down in [Catalonia’s] Decree-law 3/2023 are not suitable to attain the objective of fighting housing shortage and are disproportionate to that objective,” the document said.

Spanish authorities could have also considered less swingeing restrictions and hadn’t offered evidence that short-term rentals were responsible for housing market tensions, it added – noting that there were three times as many empty dwellings as tourist rental properties in Catalonia.

Barcelona is just one European holiday destinations trying to find ways to tackle overtourism.

Cities like Venice have banned cruise ships from stopping on their shores, Athens regularly restricts visitor numbers at the famous Acropolis and Amsterdam is moving its red light district out of the city centre to try and clean up its image.

How the European Commission is taking on holiday rentals

Brussels has already taken action to bring the sharing economy within the regulatory fold, offering new rights to platform workers and hiking value-added tax on short-term lets and ridesharing apps such as Uber.

But the issue could prove totemic for Commission President Ursula von der Leyen – who has created the first-ever European Commissioner for Housing as part of her second mandate, set to take office within weeks.

She has told Denmark’s Dan Jørgensen to “tackle systemic issues with short-term accommodation rentals”, in a mission letter that handed him the housing brief alongside responsibility for energy policy.

A spokesperson for the Catalan government did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

CORRECTION(20 November, 10:02): corrects spelling of Molnar’s name

Author

  • Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Travel

Microsoft pitches AI agents that can perform tasks on their own at annual Ignite event

Published

on

The move has been criticised by other tech companies who have branded Microsoft as being a “panic mode”.

In opening remarks to a company conference in the United States on Tuesday, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has set the stage for where the company is taking its artificial intelligence (AI) business.

AI developers are increasingly pitching the next wave of generative AI (GenAI) chatbots as AI “agents” that can do more useful things on people’s behalf.

But the cost of building and running AI tools is so high that more investors are questioning whether the technology’s promise is overblown.

Microsoft said last month that it’s preparing for a world where “every organisation will have a constellation of agents – ranging from simple prompt-and-response to fully autonomous”.

Microsoft elaborated in a blog post Tuesday that such autonomous agents “can operate around the clock to review and approve customer returns or go over shipping invoices to help businesses avoid costly supply-chain errors”.

Microsoft’s annual Ignite conference caters to its big business customers.

Microsoft criticised

The pivot toward so-called “agentic AI” comes as some users are seeing limits to the large language models behind chatbots like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Google’s Gemini and Microsoft’s own Copilot.

Those systems work by predicting the most plausible next word in a sentence and are good at certain writing-based work tasks.

But tech companies have been working to build AI tools that are better at longer-range planning and reasoning so they can access the web or control computers and perform tasks on their own on a user’s behalf.

Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff has criticized Microsoft’s pivot. Salesforce also has its “Agentforce” service that uses AI in sales, marketing, and other tasks.

“Microsoft rebranding Copilot as ‘agents’? That’s panic mode,” Benioff said in a social media post last month. He went on to claim that Microsoft’s flagship AI assistant, called Copilot, is “a flop” that is inaccurate and spills corporate data.

Author

  • Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 EuroTimes

Exit mobile version