Connect with us

Travel

I’ve been living in Venice for eight years. Why can I still see cruise ships in Venice when they are banned?

Published

on

The ban on large ships entering Venice was imposed in 2021 but has yet to be enforced.

I was eating lunch in a restaurant on a canal in Venice before the pandemic struck. A colossal cruise ship with multiple stories sailed by.

The vessel towered above the fragile medieval palaces and leaning towers. I wondered what would happen if the vessel went off course.

In June 2019, an enormous 13-decker cruise ship did just that. Five people were injured when the ship crashed into a Venice wharf.

The incident was captured on video and was so dramatic that the mayor of the city, Luigi Brugnaro, banned large ships from passing through central Venice.

It was another example, however, of the negative impact of mammoth ships for anti-cruise ship campaigners like myself. Add to the long list.

Two years later in 2021, ships over 25,000 tons were banned from entering the lagoon through the Giudecca Canal. This canal runs directly in front St Mark’s Square, and leads to the Marittima Port on the western edge. VeniceHistoric centre of’s.

Although this may have appeared to be a victory for those who are against big ships, reality is more complex.

Why has Venice banned cruise ships?

The safety of large cruise ships has been a concern for many years VeniceThe fragile natural and built environments of’s.

As heavy-weight vessels travel through canals of the lagoon, they absorb sediment that must be regularly dredged. Channels. The sediment, which contains valuable animal and plant life is then thrown away rather than returned to a lagoon’s ecosystem.

Even when moving slowly, large ships also displace vast amounts of water.

“The movement and erosive power of this massive amount of water has eroded the hundreds, and even thousands, of years old foundations and streets of Venice“, explains Valeria duflot, cofounder of the social enterprise Venezia Autentica.

Cruise ship Pollution Another issue is. Ships are exempt from the strict regulations that apply to road vehicles. Their fuel can contain as much as 3,500 times more sulphur than cars and trucks.

This affects “not just the natural environment environment Duflot says that the pollution not only affects the health of the living, but also the art works and palaces in Venice.

Oversized vessels are also a synonym for Overtourism As they cram thousands of tourists into Venice’s narrow streets. In summer I avoid touristy places like St Mark’s Square because you can get stuck behind cruise passengers trying to squeeze in as many sights as possible in one day.

The historic city’s economy is not affected much by the passengers, who tend to sleep and eat on board. However, the infrastructure and resources are heavily burdened.

Along with daytrippers cruise Passengers have been called ‘hit-and-run’ tourists. Simone Venturini, tourism councillor for the city, said that the ban on cruise ships was not the type tourism they wanted.

Around 73 percent of visitors to Venice are ‘hit and run’ tourists, but they contribute only 18 percent of the tourism revenue. Tourism economy (those who spend at least one night in an hotel are responsible for almost 50 per cent).

Not all Venetians are in favor of the cruise ship ban

Although the evidence of environmental damage is overwhelming, giant Cruise ships Venice residents don’t all vilify the scum.

After the ban in 2021 a counter-protest by Si Grandi Navi was held. This group represents the thousands of people who depend on the cruise industry for their livelihood.

According to the Port Authority, the cruise industry brought in revenues of EUR280 million. The cruise industry brought in EUR280 million in revenues (although the majority of this income didn’t benefit businesses located in the historic center).

After VeniceThe pandemic travel bans had a devastating effect on the economy of the country. Some Venetians wanted to welcome the liners back.

Filippo Olivetti said that Venice would not survive without the ban when interviewed just after it was announced. He is the managing director of Bassani Port Services in the city. Cruise shipsThe port industry has made the company rich, it says.

Alessandro Santi of the national shipping lobby Federagenti said that “4,000 workers lost their jobs, and are waiting for help that may not come”, in a press release.

Why are there still cruise liners in Venice?

The reality is that despite the ban on cruise ships in the legislation, it’s not as simple as you might think. The 92,000-tonne MSC Orchestra docked at the historic city’s harbour only months after it was banned.

The reason? The city authorities have not yet built a suitable cruise ship terminal outside the lagoon.

The port in the industrial zone of Marghera has been proposed as a temporary option, but it lacks infrastructure to become a permanent terminal for passengers.

Marghera is still in the lagoon, so the cruise ships that are redirected to this area continue to be an ecological disaster. Venice.

A deal was signed at the end of last season that would allow cruise ships to dock in Fusina, on the mainland side. Azamara will dock in Fusina this year, as well as the nearby city of Chioggia.

There is still no plan for a new ban two years after the ban was imposed. Venice port. Many cruise companies have now abandoned the lagoon and docked in Ravenna.

The transfer time from Venice to the coastal city is about two hours. This has frustrated passengers who had been sold an itinerary that included the canal city.

The Italian government also had to pay EUR22.5 Million in compensation to the Venice Terminal operators and related companies will be banned in 2022 due to the ban.

Santi’s statement added, “Venice is the most important and iconic home port in the Mediterranean.”

Author

  • Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Travel

A 4-year cruise or a €1 house in Italy: Inside the schemes helping Americans skip Trump’s presidency

Published

on

Searches by Americans for moving abroad soared in the 24 hours after the first polls closed, according to Google data.

Following the recent US election result, Google searches for ‘how to move to Europe’ increased by more than 1,000 per cent in some countries.

Searches by Americans for moving to Canada and Australia soared by 1,270 and 820 per cent respectively in the 24 hours after the first polls closed, according to Google data.

The interest in leaving the States has not gone unnoticed by marketing firms.

A residential cruise ship is now offering Americans a four-year ‘escape’ trip while a Sardinian village has relaunched its €1 house scheme.

Cruise company offers four-year escape from Trump

Cruise firm Villa Vie Residences is marketing a four-year round the world trip to Americans looking to skip Donald Trump’s second term as president.

The Tour La Vie programme offers passengers a stay of up to four years onboard while visiting 140 countries – which doesn’t include the US.

The irreverently named packages include a one-year ‘Escape from Reality’ cruise, a two-year ‘Mid-Term Selection’ option, a three-year ‘Everywhere but Home’ cruise, and the four-year ‘Skip Forward’ trip.

Guests would join the Villa Vie Odyssey, a residential cruise ship which set sail from Belfast in September, several months into its voyage.

“We came up with this marketing campaign before we even knew who would win. Regardless of who would have won, you would have half of the population upset,” CEO Mikael Petterson told US news site Newsweek.

“Quite frankly, we don’t have a political view one way or the other. We just wanted to give people who feel threatened to have a way to get out.”

Prices start at a little under $40,000 (€38,000) a year. For those opting for the full four-year escape, single-occupancy cabins start at $256,000 (€243,000) while double-occupancy costs up to $320,000 (€303,000).

The price includes all food and drinks (alcohol only at dinner), WiFi, medical visits, weekly housekeeping service and bi-weekly laundry.

Sardinian village relaunches €1 house scheme for Americans

In rural Sardinia, the village of Ollolai has revived its €1 house scheme, now targeting Americans exhausted by the election.

The homes-for-the-price-of-an-espresso offer has been relaunched for US citizens “worned [sic] out by global politics” and “looking to embrace a more balanced lifestyle”, local authorities write on the village’s website.

“Of course, we can’t specifically mention the name of one US president who just got elected, but we all know that he’s the one from whom many Americans want to get away from now and leave the country,” village mayor Francesco Columbo told US news site CNN.

“We have specifically created this website now to meet US post-elections relocation needs.”

Those needs include slowing down and recharging with Ollolai’s dreamy Mediterranean lifestyle.

“Nestled in pristine nature, surrounded by incredible cuisine, and immersed in a community with ancient traditions in the rare Earth’s Blue Zone, Ollolai is the perfect destination to reconnect, recharge and embrace a new way of life,” the website claims.

Available properties will soon be listed online with prices ranging from €1 for houses needing substantial renovations to €100,000 for those that are ready to live in.

This is not the first time the village in Sardinia has put houses for a pittance on the market. In a bid to halt a steep population decline, Ollolai began selling off abandoned homes in 2018 to people willing to carry out $25,000 (€24,000) of renovations within a three-year timespan.

Author

  • Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Travel

Catalonia’s holiday rental ban may not be allowed under EU law as Airbnb pushes back

Published

on

Catalonia has said they want to rid Barcelona of its 10,000 holiday lets in the next 5 years.

Catalonia’s recent ban on Airbnb-style holiday rentals breaches EU law, according to a complaint filed with the European Commission by an industry group.

The European Holiday Home Association claims that the ban, introduced by Catalonia in June this year, breaches the provision of services directive.

The Spanish region announced that they wanted to rid Barcelona of its 10,000 tourist flat licences over the next five years. The city has not granted new licences since 2014 but this has not helped to stem a housing crisis, with locals saying they can not find places to live at affordable prices.

Why has Barcelona’s Airbnb ban been challenged?

“We are convinced that EU law has not been respected,” Viktorija Molnar, Secretary General of the European Holiday Home Association (EHHA), said in a statement released on Wednesday.

“By submitting the EU complaint, we hope that the European Commission will take a step further and open a formal infringement procedure against Spain,” added Molnar, whose group represents short-term rental platforms like Airbnb and Expedia’s Vrbo.

The move follows legal concerns raised by the European Commission itself that restrictions brought in by the Spanish region were disproportionate to the aim of tackling housing shortages.

EHHA argues that “unjustified, disproportionate and unsuitable” restrictions breach the EU’s Services Directive, which regulates a swathe of activities from hotels to legal advice. They also said that claims about the impact of Airbnb on housing affordability are “politically inflamed”.

The lobby group may have support from the European Commission itself, whose officials wrote to Spanish authorities to protest the law in February according to a document seen by Euronews Travel.

“The Commission services consider that the restrictions laid down in [Catalonia’s] Decree-law 3/2023 are not suitable to attain the objective of fighting housing shortage and are disproportionate to that objective,” the document said.

Spanish authorities could have also considered less swingeing restrictions and hadn’t offered evidence that short-term rentals were responsible for housing market tensions, it added – noting that there were three times as many empty dwellings as tourist rental properties in Catalonia.

Barcelona is just one European holiday destinations trying to find ways to tackle overtourism.

Cities like Venice have banned cruise ships from stopping on their shores, Athens regularly restricts visitor numbers at the famous Acropolis and Amsterdam is moving its red light district out of the city centre to try and clean up its image.

How the European Commission is taking on holiday rentals

Brussels has already taken action to bring the sharing economy within the regulatory fold, offering new rights to platform workers and hiking value-added tax on short-term lets and ridesharing apps such as Uber.

But the issue could prove totemic for Commission President Ursula von der Leyen – who has created the first-ever European Commissioner for Housing as part of her second mandate, set to take office within weeks.

She has told Denmark’s Dan Jørgensen to “tackle systemic issues with short-term accommodation rentals”, in a mission letter that handed him the housing brief alongside responsibility for energy policy.

A spokesperson for the Catalan government did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

CORRECTION(20 November, 10:02): corrects spelling of Molnar’s name

Author

  • Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Travel

Microsoft pitches AI agents that can perform tasks on their own at annual Ignite event

Published

on

The move has been criticised by other tech companies who have branded Microsoft as being a “panic mode”.

In opening remarks to a company conference in the United States on Tuesday, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has set the stage for where the company is taking its artificial intelligence (AI) business.

AI developers are increasingly pitching the next wave of generative AI (GenAI) chatbots as AI “agents” that can do more useful things on people’s behalf.

But the cost of building and running AI tools is so high that more investors are questioning whether the technology’s promise is overblown.

Microsoft said last month that it’s preparing for a world where “every organisation will have a constellation of agents – ranging from simple prompt-and-response to fully autonomous”.

Microsoft elaborated in a blog post Tuesday that such autonomous agents “can operate around the clock to review and approve customer returns or go over shipping invoices to help businesses avoid costly supply-chain errors”.

Microsoft’s annual Ignite conference caters to its big business customers.

Microsoft criticised

The pivot toward so-called “agentic AI” comes as some users are seeing limits to the large language models behind chatbots like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Google’s Gemini and Microsoft’s own Copilot.

Those systems work by predicting the most plausible next word in a sentence and are good at certain writing-based work tasks.

But tech companies have been working to build AI tools that are better at longer-range planning and reasoning so they can access the web or control computers and perform tasks on their own on a user’s behalf.

Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff has criticized Microsoft’s pivot. Salesforce also has its “Agentforce” service that uses AI in sales, marketing, and other tasks.

“Microsoft rebranding Copilot as ‘agents’? That’s panic mode,” Benioff said in a social media post last month. He went on to claim that Microsoft’s flagship AI assistant, called Copilot, is “a flop” that is inaccurate and spills corporate data.

Author

  • Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 EuroTimes

Exit mobile version