Connect with us

Travel

I’ve been living in Venice for eight years. Why do cruise ships still stop here when they have been banned?

Published

on

The ban on large ships entering Venice was imposed in 2021 but has yet to be enforced.

I was eating lunch in a restaurant on a canal in Venice before the pandemic struck. A colossal cruise ship with multiple stories sailed by.

The vessel towered above the fragile medieval palaces and leaning towers. I wondered what would happen if the vessel went off course.

In June 2019, an enormous 13-decker cruise ship did just that. Five people were injured when the ship crashed into a Venice wharf.

The incident was captured on video and was so dramatic that the mayor of the city, Luigi Brugnaro, banned large ships from passing through central Venice.

It was another example, however, of the negative impact of mammoth ships for anti-cruise ship campaigners like myself. Add to the long list.

Two years later in 2021, ships over 25,000 tons were banned from entering the lagoon through the Giudecca Canal. This canal runs directly in front St Mark’s Square, and leads to the Marittima Port on the western edge. VeniceHistoric centre of’s.

Although this may have appeared to be a victory for those who are against big ships, reality is more complex.

Why has Venice banned cruise ships?

The safety of large cruise ships has been a concern for many years VeniceThe fragile natural and built environments of’s.

As heavy-weight vessels travel through canals of the lagoon, they absorb sediment that must be regularly dredged. Channels. The sediment, which contains valuable animal and plant life is then thrown away rather than returned to a lagoon’s ecosystem.

Even when moving slowly, large ships also displace vast amounts of water.

“The movement and erosive power of this massive amount of water has eroded the hundreds, and even thousands, of years old foundations and streets of Venice“, explains Valeria duflot, cofounder of the social enterprise Venezia Autentica.

Cruise ship Pollution Another issue is. Ships are exempt from the strict sulphur regulations that apply to road vehicles. Their fuel can contain as much as 3,500 times more sulphur than cars and trucks.

This affects “not just the natural environment environment Duflot says that the pollution not only affects the health of the living, but also the art works and palaces in Venice.

Oversized vessels are also a synonym for Overtourism As they pour thousands upon thousands of travellers into Venice’s narrow streets. I avoid touristy areas such as St Mark’s Square in summer because you can get stuck behind cruise passengers trying to squeeze in all the sights in a single day.

The historic city’s economy is not affected much by the passengers, who tend to sleep and eat on board. However, the infrastructure and resources are heavily burdened.

Along with daytrippers cruise Passengers have been called ‘hit-and-run’ tourists. Simone Venturini, tourism councillor for the city, said that the ban on cruise ships was not the type tourism they wanted.

Around 73 percent of visitors to Venice are ‘hit and run’ tourists, but they contribute only 18 percent of the tourism revenue. Tourism economy (those who spend at least one night in an hotel are responsible for almost 50 per cent).

Not all Venetians are in favor of the cruise ship ban

Although the evidence of environmental damage is overwhelming, giant Cruise ships Venice residents don’t all vilify the scum.

After the ban in 2021 a counter-protest by Si Grandi Navi was held. This group represents the thousands of people who depend on the cruise industry for their livelihoods.

According to the Port Authority, the cruise industry brought in revenues of EUR280 million. The cruise industry brought in EUR280 million in revenues (although the majority of this income didn’t benefit businesses located in the historic center).

After VeniceThe pandemic travel bans had a devastating effect on the economy of the country. Some Venetians wanted to welcome the liners back.

Filippo Olivetti said that Venice would not survive without the ban when interviewed just after it was announced. He is the managing director of Bassani Port Services in the city. Cruise shipsThe port industry has made the company rich, it says.

Alessandro Santi of the national shipping lobby Federagenti said that “4,000 workers lost their jobs, and are waiting for help that may not come”, in a press release.

Why are there still cruise liners in Venice?

The reality is that despite the ban on cruise ships in the legislation, it’s not as simple as you might think. The 92,000-tonne MSC Orchestra docked at the historic city’s harbour only months after it was banned.

The reason? The city authorities have not yet built a suitable cruise ship terminal outside the lagoon.

The port in the industrial zone of Marghera has been proposed as a temporary option, but it lacks infrastructure to become a permanent terminal for passengers.

Marghera is still in the lagoon, so the cruise ships that are redirected to this area continue to be an ecological disaster. Venice.

A deal was signed at the end of last season that would allow cruise ships to dock in Fusina, on the mainland side. Azamara will dock in Fusina this year, as well as the nearby city of Chioggia.

There is still no plan for a new ban two years after the ban was imposed. Venice port. Many cruise companies have now abandoned the lagoon and docked in Ravenna.

The transfer time from Venice to the coastal city is about two hours. This has frustrated passengers who had been sold an itinerary that included the canal city.

The Italian government also had to pay EUR 22.5 million as compensation to the Venice Terminal operators and related companies will be banned in 2022 due to the ban.

Santi’s statement added, “Venice is the most important and iconic home port in the Mediterranean.”

Author

  • Daniela Daecher

    Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Travel

New competitors could slash Channel Tunnel rail fare by 30 per cent in the next 15 years

Published

on

In the next 15 years, passengers on the Channel Tunnel rail line could triple, while fares could fall by almost a third.

These are the findings of a new report conducted by consultancy Steer and commissioned by London St Pancras Highspeed, owner of the tracks and station serving the Channel Tunnel.

The study forecasts a rise in passenger numbers from the current level of 11 million a year to 35 million by 2040.

This anticipated growth, along with increased competition on the route, could drive fares down by up to 30 per cent, the analysis concludes.

Plans are already in motion to double the international passenger capacity at St Pancras. At present, it supports up to 1,800 international passengers per hour, but the operator wants to see this increased to as many as 5,000 passengers an hour.

To facilitate this, London St Pancras Highspeed and Eurotunnel are collaborating to shorten journey times, improve timetable coordination and introduce more frequent services. Modifications to the station itself include reconfiguring existing spaces and constructing new facilities to cope with more passengers.

Why can we expect Channel Tunnel fares to decrease?

The 30 per cent fare reduction is projected to come as a result of increased competition and the growth in demand for rail travel through the Channel Tunnel.

Currently, Eurostar is the sole operator on the Channel Tunnel route. As with any business existing in a monopoly, fares and pricing in the absence of competition become artificially inflated.

With new operators vying to get their trains on the route, more options will stimulate competition, naturally driving down prices.

There are also the economies of scale to consider. The expected growth in demand could mean the overall cost per passenger for operators will decrease. Fixed costs of train operation can be spread across a larger number of passengers, allowing companies to price their fares a little lower.

Adding to the potential for cheaper cross-channel rail connections are new financial incentives introduced by London St. Pancras Highspeed.

Under the International Growth Incentive Scheme, new and existing operators on the HS1 line can unlock rebates of £1 (€1.17) per additional passenger carried, which will be paid into a joint fund for marketing and growing passenger demand.

New services can attract discounts on the fees for using the line of up to 50 per cent in year one, 40 per cent in year two and 30 per cent in year three.

The report leans heavily into the shift in consumer behaviour and the move towards more sustainable travel options. As the passenger base increases, operators will be able to offer lower fares and compete more fairly with budget airline options.

Which train operators are bringing the competition to the Channel Tunnel

The Channel Tunnel has been open to competitors since 2010, but the high costs of launching services and acquiring trains to run the route have deterred new operators from competing.

Recent regulatory changes and the launch of incentives have seen a newfound interest in cross-channel rail services, and several operators have already thrown their hats in the ring to operate services.

The Virgin Group has stated a desire to launch cross-channel train services by 2029. Discussions are already underway for a fleet of trains to operate the service.

Competing for access is a Spanish-led consortium known as Evolyn.  The company wants to launch high-speed services between London and Paris and has indicated it has reached an agreement with Alstom to purchase 12 high-speed trains for the service.

Also in the mix is a start-up called Gemini Trains. led by Lord Tony Berkeley, a British aristocrat and former Eurotunnel engineer. Gemini has applied for an operator’s license to service Paris, Strasbourg, Cologne, and Geneva with a fleet of 10 trains by 2029.

Most recently, Italian state railway Ferrovie dello Stato Italiane has been revealed to be studying cross-channel services and is working with Evolyn towards this goal.

Other operators have previously expressed an interest in open access to the Channel Tunnel. Deutsche Bahn showcased a high-speed train at London’s St Pancras in 2010, signaling its intent to connect London with destinations in Germany, such as Frankfurt and Cologne. However, it has not yet officially joined the bidding war for services.

Where could you go via the Channel Tunnel, and when?

While discussions are still at early stages, the proposed new competitors on Channel Tunnel services could open direct rail connections to many more European cities from London.

Paris is a key destination and will provide direct competition with Eurostar. Ferrovie, Virgin Group and Evolyn have all mentioned Paris services in their communications to date.

As well as this, Virgin wants to connect London with Amsterdam and Brussels, while Getlink wants to run services directly to German and Swiss cities, including Frankfurt, Cologne, Geneva, Zurich, and Milan.

Most of the companies are targeting a launch between 2029-2030. However, Evolyn is aiming for a more ambitious 2026 start, though this timeline may prove optimistic given the challenges of entering the market.

From finding space for storage and maintenance of trains to money for the purchase of the equipment itself, the barriers to entry remain high.

Positive signals were received in early April when the UK’s Office of Road and Rail concluded that Eurostar must provide access to new operators at Temple Mills depot, a significant hurdle for any new operator. It also said the fees on the HS1 line were too high at €30 per mile – the most expensive in Europe.

Virgin Group declared this to be “a green signal for competition,” although Eurostar maintains Temple Mills is at capacity and can’t support even one new operator.

New trains in the Channel Tunnel will take time, but increased competition will undoubtedly serve to lower prices for the traveling public.

In addition to lower fares, increased competition could significantly reduce the carbon footprint of travel as more passengers opt for this low-emission option. High-speed rail can reduce CO2 emissions by up to 90 per cent compared to flying.

Author

  • Daniela Daecher

    Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Travel

Barcelona to create special selfie zone to curb tourist chaos at Sagrada Familia

Published

on

In front of Barcelona’s Sagrada Familia, gaggles of tourists pose for selfies. They crowd the pavement before the famous Gaudí-designed basilica and even step into the road for a better angle.

This quest for an Instagram-worthy photo comes at the expense of residents’ daily lives.

For over a decade, locals have lambasted the crowds of visitors that obstruct the passage of pedestrians and hold up traffic around the religious site.

Barcelona city authorities have now unveiled plans to corral selfie-snapping visitors into a dedicated area to ease the congestion.

As one of Spain’s hotspot destinations, it is the latest measure from officials to regulate tourism in the city.

Sagrada Familia selfie space will ‘reconcile tourists and the neighbourhood’

Barcelona city council has announced it will construct a special zone beside the Sagrada Familia where visitors can take a breather – and a selfie – before entering the church.

The 6,200-square-metre ‘anteroom’ will be located between the Nativity façade of the basilica and Plaça Gaudí on Carrer de la Marina.

Until recently, Plaça Gaudí had been exploited by tourists for a TikTok trend that caused considerable disruption.

It involved visitors balancing their phones on metro escalators to film themselves while the iconic monument appeared in the background. The trend led to tourists clogging station exits and was eventually banned.

“The new project helps to resolve a space where it is difficult to reconcile uses between visitors to the temple and the neighbourhood,” the city council said in a press release.

Construction on the gathering zone is scheduled to begin after the summer and be finished by April 2026 to coincide with the 100th anniversary of Gaudí’s death.

The €2.7 million project is part of a wider €15.5 million plan to improve infrastructure and visitor management around the sacred site.

The Sagrada Familia attracts 4.7 million visitors a year and is the second most visited site in Spain, after the Alhambra in Granada.

‘Tourism needs to be serving the city’s model’

Now drawing 32 million visitors a year, Barcelona has previously introduced several measures to curb overtourism.

In 2024, the city launched a €44 million plan to regulate crowds in 16 tourist hotspots by deploying more cleaners and police officers to maintain order and safety.

Last July, the city abandoned its ‘Visit Barcelona’ slogan of 15 years in favour of the new ‘This is Barcelona’, marking a rebranding which shifts the destination away from mass tourism.

Barcelona has also pledged to ban short-term apartment rentals to tourists by 2028 and cap cruise ship disembarkations.

Speaking after the announcement last year, ​the city’s mayor Jaume Collboni said the decision came in response to the risk of Barcelona becoming a “theme park” devoid of residents.

“Tourism needs to be serving the city’s model, not the opposite,” he added.

Author

  • Daniela Daecher

    Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Travel

You’ll need to book via app to visit these spectacular beaches in Sardinia this summer

Published

on

One beach on the Italian island of Sardinia will only be accessible to visitors by booking through an app this summer.

Crescent-shaped Tuerredda beach has already been capping visitor numbers at 1,100 per day since 2020.

The new digital measure, expected to be in place by July, aims to ease the strain on local resources and infrastructure.

Many of Sardinia’s spectacular beaches are protected from overtourism with similar restrictions, with transgressors facing fines of up to €3,500.

The island’s coastline is renowned for its pristine stretches of sand and is frequently voted as one of the top places in Italy for a seaside holiday.

But it has also been suffering due to disrespectful visitor behaviour and overcrowding.

Here are all the places where the island has limited access or introduced regulations to safeguard its most popular beaches.

Spiaggia Rosa: €3,500 for stealing sand

The Spiaggia Rosa, located on the outlying Budelli island, draws thousands of tourists a day in summer to admire its magnificent pink sand. But visitors can only see the picturesque sands from a distance on a boat.

Because of the beach’s fame, it has been closed off to visitors since the mid-1990s after its coveted sand began to disappear. The local government took action after tourists were found to be smuggling kilos worth away as souvenirs.

Local authority regulations now mean walking on the beach will land you a €500 fine, while anyone caught stealing the sand will have to pay up to €3,500.

La Maddalena, Cala Coticcio and Cala Brigantina are capping visitor numbers

In the archipelago of La Maddalena, two beaches now have restricted access. Last year, only 60 people a day could visit Cala Coticcio and Cala Brigantina over the summer.

Travellers needed to book their slot online and pay €3 per person to access the beaches with a guide.

The visitor limit and access fee have not yet been announced this year, but visits will likely need to be booked by contacting a local guide directly like last year.

Several other beaches around the island now only allow access to a limited number of visitors.

In the north, Cala Brandinchi and Lu Impostu will limit numbers to 1,447 and 3,352 respectively between 1 June and 30 September. Visitors also need to book via the San Teodoro app or on the dedicated website.

At Cala Mariolu, 700 people are allowed per day between June and early November.

In Villasimius in the southeast, beachgoers heading to Punta Molentis, Riu Trottu and Portu Sa Ruxi are required to pay to access the car park. Each vehicle costs €10 with an additional €1 for each passenger. Cyclists and pedestrians pay €3.

Staff are stationed at car parks and beach access points to check tickets.

Beach towels banned on Pelosa beach

On the west coast, Stintino’s famed Pelosa beach is now only open to a limited number of visitors per day. A maximum of 1,500 people are allowed to access the beach daily. Last year, visitor numbers reached as many as 4,000 on some days.

Those looking to sunbathe on Pelosa beach need to book a ticket costing €3.50. Regulations also state that visitors can only use beach towels if they place mats underneath them, which trap less sand.

Ogliastra: Time limits for beachgoers

In Ogliastra on the east coast, 300 people a day are permitted on Cala Birìala and beachgoers who arrive by boat can only stay for 90 minutes.

Similarly, visitors to Cala dei Gabbiani are also capped at 300. Last year, visitors had to leave after two hours.

How is Italy clamping down on overtourism?

Sardinia joins several other popular tourist destinations that have introduced restrictions as a result of overcrowding.

Venice now has a booking system and fee to visit the city. In the Italian Riviera town of Portofino, tourists lingering too long and blocking streets face fines of €270.

Author

  • Daniela Daecher

    Daniela Daecher is a twenty-something bookworm and coffee addict with a passion for geeking out over sci fi, tv, movies, and books. In 2013 she completed her BA in English with a specialization in Linguistics. In 2014 she completed her MA in Linguistics, focusing on the relationship between language and communication in written form. She currently lives in Munich, Germany.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2023 EuroTimes